Review published In:
Historiographia LinguisticaVol. 36:1 (2009) ► pp.132–136
Book review
Colonialism and Grammatical Representation: John Gilchrist and the analysis of the ‘Hindustani’ language in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. By Richard Steadman-Jones
Reviewed by
References
Gilchrist, John
1787–1790 A Dictionary, English and Hindoostanee, in which the words are Marked with their Distinguishing Initials, as Hinduwee, Arabic, and Persian. 21 vols. Calcutta: Stuart & Cooper (vol. I1), Cooper & Upjohn (vol. II1).
1796 A Grammar of the Hindoostanee Language; or […] a System of Hindoostanee Philology. Calcutta: Chronicle Press.
1798 The Oriental Linguist, An Easy and Familiar Introduction to the Popular Language of Hindoostan. Calcutta: Ferris & Greenway.
Hadley, George
1796 Compendious Grammar of the Current Corrupt Dialect of the Jargon of Hindoostan (commonly called Moors). London: Sewell. [4th ed. of work originally published as Grammatical Remarks on the Practical and Vulgar Dialect of the Indoostan Language commonly called Moors, London: Cadell 1772.]
Joseph, John E.
2008 Review of Trautmann (2006). Applied Linguistics 291.518–521. 
Trautmann, Thomas R.
1997 Aryans and British India. Berkeley–Los Angeles–London: University of California Press.
2006 Languages and Nations: The Dravidian Proof in Colonial Madras. India. Berkeley–Los Angeles–London: University of California Press.