Throughout most of the history of the discipline, linguists have had little hesitation in comparing languages in terms of their relative complexity, whether or not they extrapolated judgements of superiority or inferiority from such comparisons. By the mid 20th century, however, a consensus had arisen that all languages were of equal complexity. This paper documents and explains the rise of this consensus, as well as the reasons that have led to it being challenged in recent years, from various directions, including language diversity, as analysed by Daniel Everett; arguments about Creoles and Creoloids, as put forward by Peter Trudgill, and others; and views from generative linguistics and evolutionary anthropology.
Akmajian, Adrian, Richard A. Demers, Ann K. Farmer, Robert Harnishet al.
1997Linguistics: An introduction to language and communication. 4th ed. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Andresen, Julie Tetel
1990Linguistics in America, 1769–1924: A critical history. London & New York: Routledge.
Baker, Mark C.
2001The Atoms of Language: The mind’s hidden rules of grammar. New York: Basic Books.
Baltin, Mark & Anthony Kroch
eds.1989Alternative Conceptions of Phrase Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bickerton, Derek
1984 “The Language Bioprogram Hypothesis”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 71.173–221.
Bickerton, Derek
1995Language and Human Behavior. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Bisang, Walter
2009 “On the Evolution of Complexity: Sometimes less is more in East and mainland Southeast Asia”. Sampsonet al., eds. 2009.34–39.
Bloomfield, Leonard
1933Language. New York: Henry Holt & Co..
Boas, Franz
1911 “Introduction”. Handbook of American Indian Languages, Part I1, by Franz Boas, with illustrative sketches by Roland B. Dixon, P. E. Goddard, William Jones & Truman Michelson, John E. Swanton & William Thalbitzer (= Smithsonian Institution, Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 40), 1–83. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
Boas, Franz
1938The Mind of Primitive Man. New York: Macmillan.
Bunzl, Matti
1996 “Franz Boas and the Humboldtian Tradition: From Volksgeist and Nationalcharakter to an Anthropological Concept of Culture”. Volksgeist as Method and Ethic: Essays on Boasian Ethnography and the German Anthropological Tradition, ed. by George W. Stocking, Jr., 17–78. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Burnouf, Eugène
1825aReview of Franz Bopp, “Vergleichende Zergliederung der Sanskrita-Sprache und der mit ihm verwandten Sprachen, Erste Abhandlung […]”, Abhandlungen der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, Philosophisch-historische Klasse 1825, 117–148. Journal Asiatique 61.52–62, 113–124.
Burnouf, Eugène
1825bReview of Franz Bopp, Ausführliches Lehrgebäude der Sanskrita-Sprache, (Berlin: F. Dümmler 1824) Journal Asiatique 61.298–314, 359–371.
Chomsky, Noam
1959Review of B. F. Skinner, Verbal Behavior (New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts 1957) Language 351.26–57.
Chomsky, Noam
1965Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam
1980 “Discussion”. Language and Learning: The debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky ed. by Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini, 73–83. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Chomsky, Noam
1991 “Some Notes on Economy of Derivation and Representation”. Freidin, ed. 1991.417–454.
Chomsky, Noam
2004The Generative Enterprise Revisited: Discussions with Riny Huybregts, Henk van Riemsdijk, Naoki Fukui and Mihoko Zushi. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Chomsky, Noam & Morris Halle
1968The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.
Cinque, Guglielmo
1996 “The ‘Antisymmetric’ Program: Theoretical and typological implications”. Journal of Linguistics 321.447–465.
Colapinto, John
2007 “The Interpreter: Has a remote Amazonian tribe upended our understanding of language?”. The New Yorker16April, 120–137.
Covington, Michael & Mark Rosenfelder
2010 “Are All Languages Equally Complex, or are some more primitive than others?”. [URL] Accessed 16. Sept. 2011.
Darwin, Charles
1871The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. 21 vols. London: John Murray.
DeGraff, Michel
2001 “On the Origin of Creoles”. Linguistic Typology 51.213–310.
Deutscher, Guy
2010Through the Language Glass: Why the world looks different in other languages. New York: Metropolitan Books.
Dixon, R. M. W.
1972The Dyirbal Language of North Queensland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dixon, R. M. W.
1984Searching for Aboriginal Languages: Memoirs of a field worker. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.
Dixon, R. M. W.
1997The Rise and Fall of Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Emonds, Joseph E.
1980 “Word Order in Generative Grammar”. Journal of Linguistic Research 11.33–54.
Everett, Daniel L.
2005 “Cultural Constraints on Grammar and Cognition in Pirahã: Another look at the design features of human language”. Current Anthropology 461.621–646.
Everett, Daniel L.
2008Don’t Sleep, There Are Snakes: Life and language in the Amazonian jungle. New York: Pantheon.
Everett, Daniel L.
2009 “Pirahã Culture and Grammar: A response to some criticisms”. Language 851.405–442.
Faarlund, Jan Terje
2010Review of Sampson et al., eds. (2009). Language 861.748–752.
Fortson, Benjamin W.
1997Indo-European Language and Culture: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
Freidin, Robert
ed.1991Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Fromkin, Victoria A. & Robert Rodman
1983An Introduction to Language. 3rd ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Gabelentz, Georg von der
1891Die Sprachwissenschaft: Ihre Aufgaben, Methoden und bisherigen Ergebnisse. Leipzig: T. O. Weigel.
Gil, David
2001 “Creoles, Complexity, and Riau Indonesian”. Linguistic Typology 51.325–371.
Gil, David
2007 “Creoles, Complexity and Associational Semantics”. Deconstructing creole: New horizons in language creation ed. by Umberto Ansaldo, Stephen Matthews & Lisa Lim, 67–108. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Gil, David
2008 “How Complex Are Isolating Languages?”. Miestamoet al., eds. 2008.109–131.
Gil, David
2009 “How Much Grammar Does it Take to Sail a Boat?”. Sampsonet al., eds. 2009.19–33.
Gonda, Jan
1948 “The Comparative Method as Applied to Indonesian Languages”. Lingua 11.86–101.
Greenberg, Joseph H.
1960 “A Quantitative Approach to the Morphological Typology of Language”. International Journal of American Linguistics 261.192–220.
Hale, Ken
1976 “The Adjoined Relative Clause in Australia”. Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages ed. by R. M. W. Dixon, 78–105. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
Hauser, Marc D., Noam Chomsky & W. Tecumseh Fitch
2002 “The Faculty of Language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?”. Science 2981.1569–1579.
Hawkins, John A.
2004Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hermann, Eduard
1895 “Gab es im Indogermanischen Nebensätze?”. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung 331.481–535.
Hockett, Charles F.
1958A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York: Macmillan.
Hockett, Charles F.
1979 “Introduction”. Whitney (1979 [1875]), v–xx. New York: Dover.
Hornstein, Norbert & Amy Weinberg
1981 “Case Theory and Preposition Stranding”. Linguistic Inquiry 121.55–92.
Huang, C.-T. James
1982Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Humboldt, Wilhelm von
1823, 1824 “Ueber die in der Sanskrit-Sprache durch die Suffixa twâ und yâ gebildeten Verbalformen”. Indische Bibliothek 11.433–473, 21.71–134.
Humboldt, Wilhelm von
1825 [1822] “Ueber das Entstehen der grammatischen Formen, und ihren Einfluss auf die Ideenentwicklung”. Abhandlungen der historisch-philologischen Klasse der königliche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin aus dem Jahren 1822 und 1823, 401–430. Berlin.
Humboldt, Wilhelm von
1826“Lettre à Monsieur Abel-Rémusat”, 7 mars 1826. Sections 1–7, 20–23 and 27–28 published as “Sur le génie grammatical de la langue chinoise, comparé à celui des autres langues” in Journal Asiatique 91 (1826), 115–123. [First complete publication: Lettre à Monsieur Abel Rémusat. sur la nature des formes grammaticales en général et sur le génie de la langue chinoise en particulier par monsieur Guillaume de Humboldt. Observations sur quelques passages de la lettre précédente, par M. A[bel] R[émusat], Paris: Doudey-Dupré 1827.]
Hutton, Christopher M.
1999Linguistics and the Third Reich: Mother-tongue fascism, race and the science of language. London & New York: Routledge.
Jakobson, Roman
1929Remarques sur l’évolution phonologique du russe comparée à celle des autres langues slaves. (= Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague, 2.) Prague. (Repr. in Jakobson, Selected Writings, I: Phonological studies, 2nd ed., 7–116, The Hague: Mouton 1971.)
Jakobson, Roman
1959 “Boas’ View of Grammatical Meaning”. The Anthropology of Franz Boas: Essays on the centennial of his birth ed. by Walter Goldschmidt, 139–145. Menasha, Wis.: American Anthropological Association. (Repr. in Jakobson, Selected Writings, II: Word and language, 477–488, The Hague: Mouton 1971.)
Jespersen, Otto
1894Progress in Language, with special reference to English. London: Swan Sonnenschein; New York: Macmillan. (New ed. with an Introduction by James, D. McCawley. Foreword and bibliography by Konrad Koerner, Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins 1993.)
2012a “Small Universes and Big Individuals: Locating Humboldt in evolving conceptions of language and Individualität”. Wilhelm von Humboldt: Individualität und Universalität ed. by Ute Tintemann & Jürgen Trabant, 95–111. Munich: Wilhelm Fink.
Joseph, John E.
2012bSaussure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kager, René
1999Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lauzon, Matthew
2010Signs of Light: French and British theories of linguistic communication, 1648–1789. Ithaca, N.Y. & London: Cornell University Press.
Maddieson, Ian
1984Patterns of Sound. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Maddieson, Ian
2007 “Issues of Phonological Complexity: Statistical analysis of the relationship between syllable structures, segment inventories, and tone contrasts”. Experimental Approaches to Phonology ed. by Maria Josep Solé, Patrice Speeter Beddor & Manjari Ohala, 93–103. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Malmberg, Bertil
1964New Trends in Linguistics: An orientation. Transl. by Edward Carney. Stockholm & Lund: Naturmetodens Språkinstitut. [Orig. publication as Nya vägar inom språkforskningen (Stockholm: Svenska Bokförlaget; Copenhagen: Einar Munksgaard 1959); this transl. based on 2nd ed. of 1962.]
Martinet, André
1962A Functional View of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Matisoff, James A.
1973 “Tonogenesis in Southeast Asia”. Consonant Types and Tone ed. by Larry M. Hyman, 71–95. Los Angeles: Southern California Occasional Papers in Linguistics, No. 1.
McMahon, April M. S.
1994Understanding Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McWhorter, John H.
2007Language Interrupted: Signs of nonnative acquisition in standard language grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Messing, Gordon M.
1951 “Structuralism and Literary Tradition”. Language 271.1–12.
1963 “Finitary Models of Language Users”. Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, vol. II1, ed. by R. Duncan Luce, Robert R. Bush & Eugene Galanter, 419–491. New York: John Wiley.
Moro, Andrea
2008The Boundaries of Babel: The brain and the enigma of impossible languages. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Muysken, Pieter
1988 “Are Creoles a Special Type of Language?”. Newmeyer, ed. 1898.285–301.
Nevins, Andrew A., David Pesetsky & Cilene Rodrigues
2009 “Pirahã Exceptionality: A reassessment”. Language 851.355–404.
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
ed.1988Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey. Volume II1: Linguistic Theory: Extensions and implications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
2011 “Can One Language Be ‘More Complex’ than Another?”. Unpublished paper.
Nordlinger, Rachel
2006 “Spearing the Emu Drinking: Subordination and the adjoined relative clause in Wambaya”. Australian Journal of Linguistics 261.5–29.
O’Grady, William, Michael Dobrovolsky & Mark Aronoff
1989Contemporary Linguistics: An introduction. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Olender, Maurice
1994Les langues du Paradis: Aryens et Sémites – un couple providentiel, 2nd ed., Paris: Gallimard/Le Seuil. [English version, Languages of Paradise: Aryans and Semites: A match made in heaven, transl. by Arthur Goldhammer (New York: The Other Press 2002).]
Olender, Maurice
2009Race sans histoire. Paris: Seuil.
Passy, Paul
1890Étude sur les changements phonétiques et leurs caractères généraux. Paris: Firmin-Didot.
Rémusat, Jean Pierre Abel
1824Review of Humboldt (1825, 1823–1824). Journal Asiatique 51.51–61.
Riddle, Elizabeth M.
2008 “Complexity in Isolating Languages: Lexical elaboration vs. grammatical economy”. Miestamoet al., eds. 2008.133–151.
Ridley, Matt
1999Genome: The autobiography of a species in 23 chapters. London: Fourth Estate.
Riemsdijk, Henk van
1978A Case Study in Syntactic Markedness: The binding nature of prepositional phrases. Dordrecht: Foris.
Roberts, Ian
1999 “Verb Movement and Markedness”. Language Creation and Language Change: Creolization, diachrony, and development ed. by Michel DeGraff, 287–327. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Sampson, Geoffrey
2009a “An Interview with Dan Everett”. Sampsonet al., eds. 2009.213–229.
Sampson, Geoffrey
2009b “A Linguistic Axiom Challenged”. In Sampsonet al. eds. 2009.1–18.
Sampson, Geoffrey, David Gil & Peter Trudgill
eds.2009Language Complexity as an Evolving Variable. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sapir, Edward
1921Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt & Brace.
Saussure, Ferdinand de
1916Cours de linguistique générale. Ed. by Charles Bally & Albert Sechehaye, with the assistance of Albert Riedlinger. Lausanne & Paris: Payot. (2nd ed. 1922.) [English transl., Course in General Linguistics by Wade Baskin (New York: Philosophical Library 1959).]
Saussure, Léopold de
1899Psychologie de la colonisation française, dans ses rapports avec les sociétés indigènes. Paris: Félix Alcan.
Schlegel, Friedrich von
1847The Philosophy of Life, and Philosophy of Language, in a course of lectures. Transl. by Rev. A. J. W. Morrison. London: Henry G. Bohn; New York: Harper & Brothers 1855 [Orig. publ. as Philosophie des Lebens, in funfzehn Vorlesungen gehalten zu Wien im Jahre 1827; and Philosophische Vorlesungen, insbesondere über Philosophie der Sprache und des Wortes (Wien: Carl Schaumburg 1830).]
Schuchardt, Hugo
1980Pidgin and Creole Languages: Selected essays. Ed. & transl. by G. G. Gilbert. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Siewierska, Anna
1998 “Variation in Major Constituent Order: A global and a European perspective”. Constituent Order in the Languages of Europe: Empirical approaches to language typology ed. by Anna Siewierska, 475–551. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Smith, Neil
1999Chomsky: Ideas and ideals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Trager, George L.
1948 Review of Lingua, volume I1. International Journal of American Linguistics 141.207–209.
2023. A large quantitative analysis of written language challenges the idea that all languages are equally complex. Scientific Reports 13:1
Krämer, Philipp
2013. Creole exceptionalism in a historical perspective – from 19th century reflection to a self-conscious discipline. Language Sciences 38 ► pp. 99 ff.
2017. Linguistic Aesthetics from the Nineteenth to the Twentieth Century: The Case of Otto Jespersen’s “Progress in Language”. History of Humanities 2:2 ► pp. 417 ff.
McElvenny, James
2021. Language Complexity in Historical Perspective: The Enduring Tropes of Natural Growth and Abnormal Contact. Frontiers in Communication 6
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
2021. Complexity and Relative Complexity in Generative Grammar. Frontiers in Communication 6
2022. Critical applied linguistics in the 2020s. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies 19:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Shcherbakova, Olena, Volker Gast, Damián E. Blasi, Hedvig Skirgård, Russell D. Gray & Simon J. Greenhill
2023. A quantitative global test of the complexity trade-off hypothesis: the case of nominal and verbal grammatical marking. Linguistics Vanguard 9:s1 ► pp. 155 ff.
Subbiondo, Joseph L.
2015. Language and Consciousness: The Perennial Relevance of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Language & History 58:1 ► pp. 55 ff.
Vereeck, Alexandra, Mark Janse, Katja De Herdt, Arnaud Szmalec, Cathy Hauspie & Wouter Duyck
2023. Why Plato needs psychology. Proposal for a theoretical framework underpinning research on the cognitive transfer effects of studying classical languages. Psihološka obzorja / Horizons of Psychology 32 ► pp. 121 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.