Cover not available
Part of
Handbook of Pragmatics: 21st Annual Installment
Edited by Jan-Ola Östman and Jef Verschueren
[Handbook of Pragmatics 21] 2018
► pp. 239–258

Tactile sign languages

 | Monash University, Melbourne
 | Monash University, Melbourne
 | Monash University, Melbourne
 | Monash University, Melbourne
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Body position and contact in tactile signing
  • 3.Question formation
  • 4.Turn-taking
  • 5.Feedback
  • 6.Environmental information
  • 7.A note on data collection
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 6 December 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.21.tac1
References (51)
References
Australian Sign Language Interpreters’ Association. 2014. ASLIA Workplace Health and Safety Policy. [URL]Google Scholar
Baker, C. 1977. “Regulators and turn-taking in American Sign Language discourse.” In On the Other Hand, ed. by L. Friedman, 215–236. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bell, L. 2017. “‘You feel with your eyes’: The creation of ‘New’ prostates and surgeons in and through Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.” Presented at the The anatomy of the Image, Melbourne, Monash University.
Berge, S. S. and E. Raanes. 2013. “Coordinating the chain of utterances: An analysis of communicative flow and turn taking in an interpreted group dialogue for deaf-blind persons.” Sign Language Studies 13(3): 350–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bezemer, J. and G. Kress. 2014. “Touch: A resource for making meaning.” Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 37(2): 77.Google Scholar
Bono, M., K. Kikuchi, P. Cibulk and Y. Osugi. 2014. “A colloquial corpus of Japanese Sign Language: Linguistic resources for observing sign language conversations.” Presented at the LREC .
Bono, M., R. Sakaida, R. Makino, T. Okada, K. Kikuchi, M. Cibulka, L. Willoughby, S. Iwasaki, and S. Fukushima. 2018. “Tactile Japanese Sign Language and Finger Braille: An example of data collection for minority languages in Japan.” Presented at the 8th Workshop on the Representation & Processing of Sign Languages: Involving the Language Community , Miyazaki. [URL]
Cibulka, P. 2015. “When the hands do not go home: A micro-study of the role of gesture phases in sequence suspension and closure.” Discourse Studies 17(1): 3–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016. “On how to do things with holds: Manual movement phases as part of interactional practices in signed conversation.” Sign Language Studies 16(4): 447–472. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coates, J. and T. Givon. 1997. “The construction of a collaborative floor in women’s friendly talk.” Typological Studies in Language 34: 55–90.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coates, J. and R. Sutton-Spence. 2001. “Turn-taking patterns in deaf conversation.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 5(4): 507–529. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, S. and K. Petronio. 1998. “What happens in tactile ASL.” In Pinky Extension and Eye Gaze: Language Use in Deaf Communities, ed. by C. Lucas, 18–37. Washington D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Duncan, S. 1972. “Some signals and rules for taking speaking turns in conversations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 23(2): 283.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edwards, T. 2012. “Sensing the rhythms of everyday life: Temporal integration and tactile translation in the Seattle Deaf-Blind community.” Language in Society 41(1): 29–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014a. “From compensation to integration: Effects of the pro-tactile movement on the sublexical structure of Tactile American Sign Language.” Journal of Pragmatics 69: 22–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014b. Language Emergence in the Seattle DeafBlind Community. Berkeley: University of California. [URL]Google Scholar
2018. “Sign-creation in the Seattle DeafBlind community.” Gesture 16(2): 305–328.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Girard-Groeber, S. 2015. “The management of turn transition in signed interaction through the lens of overlaps.” Frontiers in Psychology 6: 741.Google Scholar
Groeber, S. and E. Pochon-Berger. 2014. “Turns and turn-taking in sign language interaction: A study of turn-final holds.” Journal of Pragmatics 65: 121–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haas, C., E. Fleetwood and M. Ernest. 1995. “An analysis of ASL Variation within DeafBlind-DeafBlind interaction: Question forms, backchanneling, and turn taking.” School of Communication Student Forum 103–40.Google Scholar
Hepp, P. 1998. “Taubblindheit - Doppplte Kommunikationsbehinderung: Die Bedeutung der ‘taktilen Gebärdensprache’ in Deutschland [Deafblindness - double communication handicap. The meaning of tactile sign language in Germany].” Das Zeichen 12(45): 384–391.Google Scholar
Iwasaki, S., M. Bartlett, H. Manns and L. Willoughby. (in press). "The Challenges of multimodality and multi-sensoriality: Methodological issues in analyzing tactile signed interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics.DOI logo
Janzen, Terry, Barbara Shaffer, and Sherman Wilcox. 1999. “Signed language pragmatics.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Jan-Ola Östman & Jef Verschueren. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kikuchi, K. 2011. “Nishakan no shuwa kaiwa deno junban koutai ni okeru shisen idou no bunseki [An analysis of gaze shifts in turn-taking in sign language conversations].” The Japanese Journal of Language in Society 14(1): 154–168.Google Scholar
Lahtinen, R. 2008. Haptices and Haptemes: A Case Study of Developmental Process in Touch-Based Communication of Acquired Deafblind People. PhD Dissertstion, Helsinki University.
Lahtinen, R., R. Palmer and S. Ojala. 2012. “Visual art experiences through touch using haptices.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 45: 268–276.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, D., H. Hwang and M. Frank. 2016. “The body: Postures, gait, proxemics, and haptics.” In APA Handbook of Nonverbal Communication, 387–400. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCleary, L. and T. de A. Leite. 2013. “Turn-taking in Brazilian sign language: Evidence from overlap.” Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders 4(1): 123–154.Google Scholar
Mesch, J. 2001. Tactile Sign Language: Turn Taking and Question in Signed Conversations of Deaf-Blind People. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
2013. “Tactile signing with one-handed perception.” Sign Language Studies 13(2): 238–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016. “Manual backchannel responses in signers’ conversations in Swedish Sign Language.” Language & Communication 50: 22–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mesch, J., E. Raanes and L. Ferrara. 2015. “Co-forming real space blends in tactile signed language dialogues.” Cognitive Linguistics 26(2): 261–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Napier, J., R. McKee and D. Goswell. 2010. Sign Language Interpreting: Theory and Practice in Australia and New Zealand, 2nd edition. Annandale, N.S.W: Federation Press.Google Scholar
Napoli, D. J. 2014. “A magic touch: Deaf gain and the benefits of tactile sensation.” In Deaf Gain: Raising the Stakes for Human Diversity, ed. by H. Dirksen. L. Bauman and J. J. Murray, 211–232. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Nielsen, G. (ed.). 2012. 103 Haptic Signs - A Reference Book. The Danish Association of the Deafblind.Google Scholar
Palmer, R. and R. Lahtinen. 2015. “History of social-haptic communication.” [URL].
Perniss, P. 2015. “Collecting and anlysing sign language data: Video requirements and use of annotation software.” In Research Methods in Sign Language Studies: A Practical Guide, ed. by E. Orfanidou, B. Woll and G. Morgan, 55–73. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Petronio, K. 2010. “Deaf-Blind interpreting: Building on what you already know.” Cadernos de Tradução 2(26): 237–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petronio, K. and V. Dively. 2006. “Yes, no, visibility, and variation in ASL and Tactile ASL.” Sign Language Studies 7(1): 57–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quinto-Pozos, D. 2002. “Deixis in the visual/gestural and tactile/gestural modalities.” In Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Languages, ed. by R. P. Meier, K. Cormier and D. Quinto-Pozos, 442–467. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raanes, E. 2011. “Tegnrom og taktilt tegnspråk.” Norsk Lingvistisk Tidsskrift 29: 54–86.Google Scholar
Raanes, E. and S. S. Berge. 2017. “Sign language interpreters’ use of haptic signs in interpreted meetings with deafblind persons.” Journal of Pragmatics 107: 91–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reed, C. M., L. A. Delhorne, N. I. Durlach and S. D. Fischer. 1995. “A study of the tactual reception of sign language.” Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 38(2): 477–489.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H., E. A. Schegloff and G. Jefferson. 1974. “A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation.” Language 50: 696–735.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schembri, A., J. Fenlon, R. Rentelis, S. Reynolds and K. Cormier. 2013. “Building the British Sign Language Corpus.” Language Documentation and Conservation 7: 136–154.Google Scholar
Schwarz, S. 2004. Eléments pour une analyse de la langue des signes tactile pratiquée par les personnes sourdes-aveugles. Université Paris VIII - St Denis, Département de Sciences du Langage.Google Scholar
2009. Stratégies de synchronisation interactionnelle: alternance conversationnelle et rétroaction en cours de discours chez des locuteurs sourdaveugles pratiquant la Langue des Signes Française tactile [Interactional synchronization strategies: Alternating and conversational communication and feedback signals in French tactile sign language]. Université Paris VIII - St Denis, Département de Sciences du Langage.Google Scholar
Stivers, T., N.J. Enfield, P. Brown, C. Englert, M. Hayashi, T. Heinemann, et al. 2009. “Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 106: 10587–10592. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, D. 1990. You Just Don’t Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
van Herreweghe, M. and M. Vermeerbergen. 2012. “Data collection.” In Sign Language: An International Handbook, ed. by B. Woll, M. Steinbach and R. Pfau, 401–420. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Willoughby, L., H. Manns, S. Iwasaki and M. Bartlett. 2014. “Misunderstanding and repair in Tactile Auslan.” Sign Language Studies 14(4): 419–443. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (19)

Cited by 19 other publications

Simcock, Peter, Jill Manthorpe & Anthea Tinker
2025. Giving voice by doing with not doing through: Collaborating with tactile sign language interpreters in interpretative phenomenological analysis research involving older deafblind people. Qualitative Social Work 24:1 ► pp. 44 ff. DOI logo
Axelsson, Anna Karin, Emil Holmer, Krister Schönström & Charlotta Plejert
2024. Strategies to Facilitate Social Interaction with Adults with Congenital Deafblindness: Communication Partner’s Perceptions. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Jablan, Branka, Sonja Alimović & Vesna Vučinić
2024. Tactile sign language of people with deaf-blindness. Specijalna edukacija i rehabilitacija 23:1 ► pp. 81 ff. DOI logo
Topp, Sven, Shuangshuang Xiao, Basil Duvernoy, Jeraldine Milroy, Zhanat Kappassov, Nurlan Kabdyshev, Roope Raisamo, Vincent Hayward & Mounia Ziat
2024. Mediated and non-mediated tactile fingerspelling: a comparative study. Assistive Technology ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Drożdżowicz, Anna
2023. Linguistic modalities and the sources of linguistic utterances. Synthese 201:5 DOI logo
Mesch, Johanna
2023. Creating a multifaceted corpus of Swedish Sign Language. In Advances in Sign Language Corpus Linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 108], ► pp. 242 ff. DOI logo
Moriarty, Erin & Lynn Hou
2023. Deaf Communities. In A New Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, ► pp. 122 ff. DOI logo
Reed, Charlotte M., Hong Z. Tan & Lynette A. Jones
2023. Haptic Communication of Language. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 16:2 ► pp. 134 ff. DOI logo
Edwards, Terra
2022. The difference intersubjective grammar makes in protactile DeafBlind communities. Lingua 273 ► pp. 103303 ff. DOI logo
Edwards, Terra
2024. Going Tactile, DOI logo
Edwards, Terra
2024. The medium of intersubjectivity. Anthropological Theory 24:2 ► pp. 136 ff. DOI logo
Iwasaki, Shimako, Meredith Bartlett, Louisa Willoughby & Howard Manns
2022. Handling Turn Transitions in Australian Tactile Signed Conversations. Research on Language and Social Interaction 55:3 ► pp. 222 ff. DOI logo
Letico, Vanessa, Mary Iliadis & Reece Walters
2022. De(a)fining consent: Exploring nuances of offering and receiving sexual consent among Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing people. Criminology & Criminal Justice ► pp. 174889582211208 ff. DOI logo
Villwock, Agnes & Konstantin Grin
2022. Somatosensory processing in deaf and deafblind individuals: How does the brain adapt as a function of sensory and linguistic experience? A critical review. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Edwards, Terra & Diane Brentari
2021. The Grammatical Incorporation of Demonstratives in an Emerging Tactile Language. Frontiers in Psychology 11 DOI logo
Raanes, Eli & Sigrid Slettebakk Berge
2021. Intersubjective Understanding in Interpreted Table Conversations for Deafblind Persons. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 23:1 ► pp. 260 ff. DOI logo
Raanes, Eli
2020. Access to Interaction and Context Through Situated Descriptions: A Study of Interpreting for Deafblind Persons. Frontiers in Psychology 11 DOI logo
Willoughby, Louisa, Howard Manns, Shimako Iwasaki & Meredith Bartlett
2019. Are you trying to be funny? Communicating humour in deafblind conversations. Discourse Studies 21:5 ► pp. 584 ff. DOI logo
Willoughby, Louisa, Howard Manns, Shimako Iwasaki & Meredith Bartlett
2020. From Seeing to Feeling: How Do Deafblind People Adapt Visual Sign Languages?. In Dynamics of Language Changes, ► pp. 235 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.