Article published in:
Semiotics: A way of thinking & approaching information design
Edited by Priscila Lena Farias and João Queiroz
[Information Design Journal 23:2] 2017
► pp. 173183
References

References

Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S. & Silverstein, M.
(1977) A pattern language: Towns, buildings, construction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bains, P.
(2006) The primacy of semiosis: An ontology of relations. Toronto: Toronto University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barnard, P. & Wright, P.
(1976) The effects of spaced character formats on the production and legibility of handwritten names. Ergonomics, 19, 81–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barnard, P., Wright, P. and Wilcox, P.
(1978) The effects of spatial constraints on the legibility of handwritten alphanumeric codes. Ergonomics, 21, 73–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1979) Effects of response instructions and question style on the ease of completing forms. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 52, 209–226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barthes, R.
(1968) Elements of semiology. Translated by Lavers, A. & Smith, C. New York: Hill & Wang. (Originally published in French as Éléments de sémiologie, 1964.)Google Scholar
Chandler, D.
(2007) Semiotics: The basics. (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fisher, P. & Sless, D.
(1990) Information design methods and productivity in the insurance industry. Information Design Journal, 6(2), 108–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frayling, C.
(1993), Research in art and design. RCA Research Papers, 1(1), London: Royal College of Art.Google Scholar
Friedman, K.
(2002) Theory construction in design research: Criteria, approaches, and methods. In Shackleton, J. & Durling, D. (eds). Common ground: Proceedings of the 2002 Design Research Society International Conference, London. Stoke-on-Trent, UK: Staffordshire University Press.Google Scholar
Frohlich, D. M.
(1986) On the organisation of form-filling behaviour. Information Design Journal, 5(1), 43–59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holland, V. M., & Redish, J. C.
(1981) Strategies for using forms and other public documents. Paper presented at Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics, Document Design Centre, American Institutes for Research.
Janik, C., Swaney, J. H., Bond, S. J. & Hayes, J. R.
(1981), Informed consent: reality or illusion. Information Design Journal, 2(3/4), 197–207. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jarrett, C. & Paul, T.
(2016) Design patterns in government: One year on, what we learned, what we changed. Presentation to the Service Design in Government Conference 2016, London. http://​www​.slideshare​.net​/cjforms​/design​-patterns​-in​-government​-2016
Kinross, R.
(2005) The claim of reason: A twenty-five year argument about information design. Information Design Journal, 13(3), 211–215. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meredith, P.
(1966) Instruments of communication: An essay on scientific writing. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Miller, R.
(1984) Transaction structures and format in form design. In: H. Zwaga., and R. Easterby (eds), Information Design. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 529–544.Google Scholar
Morris, C.W.
(1938) Foundations of the theory of signs. International Encyclopaedia of Unified Science, 1(2), 2–32. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Neilsen, J. & Molich, R.
(1990) Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In CHI ’90 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY: ACM, 249–256.
Pearce, W Barnett
(1995) A sailing guide for social constructionists. In Leeds-Hurwitz, Wendy (ed), Social Approaches to Communication, 88–113. New York: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
Redish, J., Felker, D., & Rose, A.
(1981) Evaluating the effects of document design principles. Information Design Journal, 2(3/4), 236–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rose, A. M.
(1981) Problems in public documents. Information Design Journal, 2(3/4), 179–196. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, A.
(1979) Fighting business gobbledygook: How to say it in plain English. Management Review, 68(11).Google Scholar
Sless, D.
(1999) Designing and evaluating forms in large organizations. In Zwaga, H., Boersema, T. & Hoonhout, H. (eds.). Visual information for everyday use. London: Taylor & Francis, 135–153.Google Scholar
(1986a) Reading semiotics. Information Design Journal, 4, 179–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1986b) In Search of Semiotics. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
(2015) Regulating information for people: How information design has made a difference to the ways in which governments and industry regulate information. In J. Frascara (ed) Information design as principled action: Making information accessible, relevant, understandable, and usable. Common ground publishing pp. 190–208.Google Scholar
Sless, D. & Shrensky, R.
(2006) Writing about medicines for people. Sydney: Australian Self Medication Industry.Google Scholar
Tidwell, J.
(1999) Common ground: A pattern language for human-computer interface design. http://​www​.mit​.edu​/~jtidwell​/common​_ground​.html
Waller, R.
(1984) Designing a government form: A case study. Information Design Journal, 4, 36–57 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Waller, R. & Delin, J.
(2010) Towards a pattern language approach to document description. A paper presented at the conference Multidisciplinary approaches to discourse , Moissac, France, 2010. Technical Paper 4, Simplifcation Centre, University of Reading. https://​www​.reading​.ac​.uk​/web​/FILES​/simplification​/tech​_paper​_4​.pdf
Wright, P.
(1975) Forms of complaint. New Behaviour, 2, 206–209.Google Scholar
(1979) The quality control of document design. Information Design Journal, 1, 33–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1980) Strategy and tactics in the design of forms. Visible Language, 15, 151–193.Google Scholar
(1984) Informed design for forms. In H. Zwaga, and R. Easterby (eds), Information Design. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 545–577.Google Scholar
Wright, P., & Barnard, P.
(1975) “Just fill out this form…”: A review for designers. Applied Ergonomics, 6, 213–220. CrossrefGoogle Scholar