Medical personnel usually write and design documents that inform physicians or patients about procedures or therapies. Document design, however, requires skills that are not normally applied, resulting in information that is often not used properly. This article describes a project developed by the Alberta Colorectal Cancer Screening Program. The goal was to help patients better prepare for their colonoscopies. The process started with an analysis of the existing documents, and the development of performance specifications based on the literature on legibility, reading comprehension, memorization and use of information, plain language, visual perception, page layout, and image use. The project included an iterative process of prototyping and testing that resulted in 23 design criteria. Each iteration was tested with users to ensure ease of use, completeness of information, and accuracy and clarity to facilitate adoption. The project helped reduce practice variation regarding bowel preparation in the province of Alberta, Canada. This project illustrates how information design can help healthcare organizations provide patient-centred care. Information design helps patients engage in their own caring process, by providing information that people can use, understand and apply. After 15 months of use, the document has been downloaded more than 48,000 times, suggesting a good physician reception.
(2002) ANSI Z535.4-2002. American National Standard for product safety signs and labels. Retrieved from [URL]
Bodenheimer, T., & Sinsky, C.
(2014) From triple to quadruple aim: Care of the patient requires care of the provider. Analysis of Family Medicine, 12(6), 573–576.
Desaulniers, D. R.
(1987) Layout, organization and the effectiveness of consumer product warnings. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 31st Annual Meeting (pp. 56–60). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
Desaulniers, D. R., Gillan, D. J., & Rudisill, M.
(1988) The effects of format in computer based procedure displays. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 32nd Annual Meeting (pp. 291–295). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
Frascara, J.
(1999) Cognition, emotion and other inescapable dimensions of human experience. Visible Language, 33(1), 74–89.
Frascara, J.
(2006) Typography and the visual design of warnings. In M. Wogater (Ed.), The handbook of warnings (pp. 385–405). London, UK: Erlbaum.
(2017) Design, and design education: How can they get together?Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 16(1), 125–131.
Grether, W. F., & Baker, C. A.
(1972) Visual presentation of information. In H. P. Van Cott & R. G. Kinkade (Eds.), Human engineering guide to equipment design (pp. 49–127). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
Hartley, J.
(2004) Designing instructional and informational text. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 917–947). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hochuli, J.
(2008) Detail in typography. London: Hyphen Press.
(1984) Readability and comprehension. In R. Easterby & H. Zwaga (Eds.), Information design (pp. 479–495). London, UK: Wiley & Sons.
King-Marshall, E. C., Mueller, N., Dailey, A., Barnett, T. E., George Jr, T. J., Sultan, S., & Curbow, B.
(2016) “It is just another test they want to do”: Patient and caregiver understanding of the colonoscopy procedure. Patient education and counseling, 99(4), 651–658.
Lewis, J., & Ritchie, J.
(2003) Generalising from qualitative research. Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. London, UK: SAGE Publications.
Mayer, R. E.
(2005) The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
McNamara, T.
(2005) Semantic priming: Perspectives from memory and word recognition. London, UK: Taylor & Francis Group.
Miller, G. A.
(1994) The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 101(2), 343–352.
Ness, R. M., Manam, R., Hoen, H., & Chalasani, N.
(2001) Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. The American journal of gastroenterology, 96(6), 1797.
Rousseau, D. M., & Gunia, B. C.
(2016) Evidence-based practice: the psychology of EBP implementation. Annual Review of Psychology, 671, 667–692.
Slattery, T. J., & Rayner, K.
(2009) The influence of text legibility on eye movements during reading. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(8), 1129–1148.
Smith, S.
(1984) Lettersize and legibility. In R. Easterby & H. Zwaga (Eds.), Information design (117–186). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Schriver, K.
(2013) What do technical communicators need to know about information design? In J. Johnson & S. Selber (Eds.), Solving problems in technical communication (pp. 386–427). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Shaver, E. F., & Wogalter, M. S.
(2003) A comparison of older vs. newer over-the-counter (OTC) nonprescription drug labels on search time accuracy. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47th Annual Meeting (pp. 826–830). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
Smith, S. L.
(1984) Letter size and legibility. In R. Easterby & H. Zwaga (Eds.), Information design (171–186). London: Wiley.
Sweller, J.
(1988) Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2): 257–285.
Tinker, M. A.
(1963) Legibility of print. Ames, IA: Iowa University Press.
Waller, R.
(2011) What makes a good document? The criteria we use. Reading, UK: University of Reading. Retrieved from [URL]
Waller, R., & Waller, J.
(2015) Transforming government letters: Design and writing working together. In J. Frascara (Ed.), Information design as principled action: Making information accessible, relevant, understandable, and usable (210–222). Champaign, IL: Common Ground.
Wexner, S. D., Beck, D. E., Baron, T. H., Fanelli, R. D., Hyman, N., Shen, B., & Wasco, K. E.
(2006) A consensus document on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: Prepared by a task force from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, 20(7), 1147–1160.
Wogalter, M. S., Howe, J. E., Sifuentes, A. H., & Luginuhl, J.
(1999) On the adequacy of legal documents: factors that influence informed consent. Ergonomics, 42(4), 593–613.
Wogalter, M. S., & Vigilante, W. J. Jr.
(2003) Effects of label format on knowledge acquisition and perceived readability by younger and older adults. Ergonomics, 46(4), 327–344.
Wright, P.
(1994) Enhancing the usability of written instructions. Proceedings of Public Graphics (pp. 26–30). Lunteren, The Netherlands: Delft University and Utrecht University.
Wright, P., & Barnard, P.
(1975) ‘Just fill in this form’: A review for designers. Applied Ergonomics, 6(4), 213–220.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.