Cover not available
Article published In:
International Journal of Chinese Linguistics
Vol. 11:2 (2024) ► pp.151–167

Towards a reconstruction of Proto-Coastal Min voiced coronal affricate and fricative initials

ORCID logo | The Chinese University of Hong Kong
In this paper, we compare the corresponding sets across the Coastal Min dialects and reconstruct three voiced coronal initials, namely, *dʒ-, dʒh- and *ð-, for Proto-Coastal Min. The main reason of reconstructing voiced initials is that the Eastern Min varieties have undergone fricativization of some earlier affricates, which only occur in the yang tonal register. The development of these initials in modern languages is also discussed. It is found that while the Pu-Xian dialects share some similar features with Eastern Min regarding the initials under discussion, there is no strong reason to assume that they are genetically closer within the Coastal Min family.
Keywords: Proto-Coastal Min, reconstruction, affricate, fricative, voiced initial
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.About Proto-Coastal Min, Proto-Eastern Min and Proto-Southern Min
  • 3.Sound correspondences across the modern dialects
    • 3.1Corresponding set 1 (PEM *tʃ- : PSM *ts-)
    • 3.2Corresponding set 2 (PEM *θ- : PSM *ts-)
    • 3.3Corresponding set 3 (PEM *tʃh- : PSM *tsh-)
    • 3.4Corresponding set 4 (PEM *θ- : PSM *s-)
    • 3.5Corresponding set 5 (PEM *θ- : PSM *tsh-)
  • 4.Towards the reconstructions
    • 4.1The necessity of reconstruction voiced obstruents for Proto-Coastal Min
    • 4.2Corresponding set 1 in the yang tonal register: ‘spurious proto‑phonemes’
    • 4.3The reconstruction of Proto-Coastal Min *dʒ- and *dʒh-
    • 4.4The reconstruction of Proto-Coastal Min *ð-
    • 4.5From Proto-Coastal Min to modern dialects
  • 5.Resolving the ‘Pu-Xian paradox’
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 5 December 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.00027.kwo
References (29)
References
Akitani, H. (2018a). Mindongqu Ningde fangyan yinyunshi yanjiu (A phonological history of the Ningde dialect of Eastern Min). Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
(2018b). Mindongqu fangyan de ‘duzi’ he ‘duqi’ (The words for ‘stomach’ and ‘navel’ in the Eastern Min dialects). Bulletin of Linguistic Studies, 21 1, 510–520.Google Scholar
(2019). Minyu zhong dutong zhangzu de jingzu zi (The phonological change of the ‘jing’ initial to the ‘zhang’ initial in the Min dialects). Bulletin of Chinese Phonology, 23 1, 77–98.Google Scholar
(2020). Mindong sixianshi fangyan diaocha yanjiu (A dialectal survey of four counties and cities in Eastern Min). Shanghai: Shanghai Educational Publishing House.Google Scholar
(2022). Yuanshi Minyu de xingcheng niandai — jianlun Minyu cihui de dongxi duili (The time of formation of Proto-Min, and the east-west distinction of the Min lexicons). The 55th International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics. Kyoto University, September 2022.
Akitani, H. & Chen, Z. P. (2012). Mindongqu Gutian fangyan yanjiu (A study of the Gutian Eastern Min dialects). Fuzhou: Fujian People’s Publishing House.Google Scholar
Akitani, H. & Handel, Z. (2012). Lishi bijiaofa he cengci fenxifa (The role of the comparative method and stratum analysis in the reconstruction of Chinese dialect history). Essays on Linguistics, 45 1, 277–335.Google Scholar
Baxter, W. H. & Sagart, L. (2014). Old Chinese: A new reconstruction. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bodman, N. (1985). The reflexes of initial nasals in Proto-Southern Min-Hinghua. Oceanic Linguistics special publication No. 20 for Gordon H. Fairbanks, 2–20.Google Scholar
Branner, D. (1999). The classification of Longyan. Simmons, R. V. (Ed.). Issues in Chinese dialect description and classification (pp.36–83). Journal of Chinese Linguistics monograph series No.15. Berkeley: Project on Linguistic Analysis.Google Scholar
Cai, G. M. (2016). Pu-Xian fangyan yanjiu (A study on the Pu-Xian dialects). Xiamen: Xiamen University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, Z. P. & Akitani, H. (2004). Fuzhou fangyan de sechayin yanbian kaocha (A study of the evolution of affricates in the Fuzhou dialect). The editorial board of the Zhongguo yuwen (Ed.). Qingzhu Zhongguo yuwen chuangkan wushi zhounian xueshu lunwenji (Proceedings of the 50th anniversary celebrations of the Zhongguo yuwen ) (pp.180–186). Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Chen, Z. T. & Li, R. L. (1991). Minyu yanjiu (Studies of the Min dialects). Beijing: Language and Culture Press.Google Scholar
Chinese Academy of Social Sciences et al. 2012. Zhongguo yuyan ditu ji (di’er ban) (Language atlas of China, 2nd edition). Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Coblin, W. S. (2018a). Jerry Norman: reflections on the development and current status of Sinological linguistics. Bulletin of Linguistic Studies, 21 1, 56–78.Google Scholar
(2018b). Convergence as a factor in the formation of a controversial Common Min phonological configuration (revised version). Bulletin of Linguistic Studies, 21 1, 79–122.Google Scholar
Hou, J. Y. (Ed.). (2002). Xiandai Hanyu fangyan gailun [A sketch of modern Chinese dialects]. Shanghai: Shanghai Educational Publishing House.Google Scholar
Kwok, B-C. (2018). Southern Min: comparative phonology and subgrouping. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Li, R. L., Liu, F. Z., Wu, H. Y. & Huang, G. C. (2019). Pu-Xian fangyan diaocha baogao (A survey report on the Pu-Xian dialects). Xiamen: Xiamen University Press.Google Scholar
Norman, J. (1969). The Kienyang dialect of Fukien. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
(1973). Tonal development in Min. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 1 ( 2 ), 222–238.Google Scholar
(1974). The initials of Proto-Min. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 2 ( 1 ), 27–36.Google Scholar
(1977–78). A preliminary report on the dialects of Mintung. Monumenta Serica, 33 1, 326–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1981). The Proto-Min finals. Proceedings of the international conference on Sinology (Section on linguistics and paleography) (pp.35–73). Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
(1991). The Min dialects in historical perspective. Wang, W.S-Y. (Ed.). Languages and dialects of China (pp.325–360). Journal of Chinese Linguistics monograph series No.3. Berkeley: Project on Linguistic Analysis.Google Scholar
Wu, R. W. (2021). Lun Pu-Xian fangyan zai Minyuzhong de fenquan: jianlun yuanshi Minnanyu zhong yu *y xiangguan yunmu de ni’ce (The subgrouping of the Pu-Xian dialects within the Min group, and the reconstruction of rhymes related to *y in Proto-Southern Min). Wu, R. W. et al. (Ed.). Benzi, fangyan, yuwenxue: Hanyu gongshi yu lishi yanjiu (Etymology, dialect and philology: synchronic and diachronic studies of the Chinese languages) (pp.157–177). Taipei: Chengchi University Press.Google Scholar
Xiaoxuetang. [URL] (Retrieval date: 4 December 2023).
Ye, B. K. (2002). Pu-Xian fangyan bianchayin chutan (A preliminary study on the lateral fricative of the Pu-Xian dialects). Ting, P-H. & Chang, S-H. (Ed.). Minyu yanjiu ji qi yu zhoubian fangyan de guanxi (A study on the Min languages and their relationships with neighboring dialects) (pp.291–295). Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong Press.Google Scholar
Zhuang, C. S. (2002). Minyu Pinghe fangyan shuyu yimu baiduceng de jige benzi (Etymologies of several words belonging to the colloquial layer of Middle Chinese yi-initial in the Pinghe dialect of Min). Studies in Languages, 3 1, 52–55.Google Scholar