Review published In:
International Journal of Corpus LinguisticsVol. 29:2 (2024) ► pp.286–290
Book review
. Broadening the spectrum of corpus linguistics: New approaches to variability and change. John Benjamins, 2022. vi + 321 pp. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.105
Reviewed by
References (12)
CEEC Project Team. (2006). Parsed
Corpus of Early English Correspondence (parsed version). Annotated
by Taylor, A., Nurmi, A., Warner, A., Pintzuk, S., & Nevalainen, T.
Davies, M. (2010). The
Corpus of Historical American English (COHA): 400 million words, 1810–2009. [URL]
(2016–). Corpus
of News on the Web (NOW): 3+ billion words from 20 countries, updated every
day. Retrieved January 1,
2021, from [URL]
Gries, S., & Adelman, A. (2014). Subject
realization in Japanese conversation by native and non-native speakers: Exemplifying a new paradigm for learner corpus
research. In J. Romero-Trillo (Ed.), Yearbook
of corpus linguistics and pragmatics 2014: New empirical and theoretical
paradigms (pp. 35–54). Springer. 
Gries, S., & Deshors, S. (2014). Using
regressions to explore deviations between corpus data and a standard/target: Two
suggestions. Corpora,
9
(1), 109–136.
Hall, K., Borba, R., & Hiramoto, M. (2021). Language
and gender. In J. Stanlaw (Ed.), The
international encyclopedia of linguistic
anthropology (pp. 1–22). John Wiley & Sons.
Kroch, A., Santorini, B., & Delfs, L. (2004). Penn-Helsinki
Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English (PPCEME). [URL]
Kroch, A., Taylor, A., & Santorini, B. (2000). The
Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English (PPCME2). [URL]
Meyer, C. F. (2004). Can
you really study language variation in linguistic corpora? American
Speech,
79
(4), 339–355.
Römer, U. (2005). Progressives,
patterns, pedagogy: A corpus-driven approach to English progressive forms, functions, contexts, and
didactics. John Benjamins.
Tannen, D. (1992). You
just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation. Virago Press.
West, C., & Zimmerman, D. (1987). Doing
gender. Gender and
Society,
1
(2), 125–151.