Article published In:
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Vol. 19:1 (2014) ► pp.94117
References (62)
Adams, M. J.
2010-2011“Advancing our students’ language and literacy: The challenge of complex tasks”. American Educator , 34 (4), 3-11, 53.Google Scholar
2009“The challenge of advanced texts: The interdependence of reading and learning”. In E. H. Hiebert (Ed.), Reading More, Reading Better: Are American Students Reading Enough of the Right Stuff? New York: Guilford, 163-189.Google Scholar
Armbruster, F. E.
1977 Our Children’s Crippled Future: How American Education Has Failed . New York: Quadrangle/New York Times Book Co.Google Scholar
Barr, R. & Sadow, M.
1989 “Influence of basal programs on fourth-grade reading instruction”. Reading Research Quarterly , 24 (1), 44-71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bestor, A. E.
1953 Educational Wastelands: The Retreat from Learning in Our Public Schools . Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Britton, G. & Lumpkin, M. C.
1977 “For sale: Subliminal bias in textbooks”. The Reading Teacher , 31 (1), 40-45.Google Scholar
Brown, D.
2011 “What aspects of vocabulary knowledge do textbooks give attention to?”. Language Teaching Research , 15 (1), 83-97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carroll, J. B.
1964 Language and Thought . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B., Davies, P. & Richman, B.
1971 The American Heritage Word Frequency Book . Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Chall, J. S.
1967 Learning to Read: The Great Debate . New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Chall, J. S., Conard, S. S., Harris, S. H. &
College Entrance Examination Board 1977 An Analysis of Textbooks in Relation to Declining SAT Scores: Prepared for the Advisory Panel on the Scholastic Aptitude Test Score Decline . New York: The Board.Google Scholar
Copperman, P.
1978 The Literacy Hoax: The Decline of Reading, Writing, and Learning in the Public Schools and What We Can Do About It . New York: Morrow.Google Scholar
Council on Interracial Books for Children, Inc
1976 Sexism and Racism in Popular Basal Readers 1964-1976. The Racism and Sexism Resource Center for Educators . New York: Racism and Sexism Resource Center for Educators.Google Scholar
Coxhead, A.
2000 “A new academic word list”. TESOL Quarterly , 34 (2), 213-238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Criado, R. & Sanchez, A.
2009“Vocabulary in EFL textbooks: A contrastive analysis against three corpus-based word ranges”. In P. Cantos & A. Sanchez (Eds.), A Survey on Corpus-based Research . Murcia: Spanish Association for Corpus Linguistics, 862-875.Google Scholar
Durkin, D.
1978-1979“What classroom observations reveal about reading comprehension instruction”. Reading Research Quarterly , 14 (4), 481-533. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1981 “Reading comprehension instruction in five basal reader series”. Reading Research Quarterly , 16 (4), 515-544. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Educational Testing Service
1991 College Bound Seniors: 1991 Profile of SAT and Achievement Test Takers . Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
Foster, T. E., Ardoin, S. P. & Binder, K. S.
2013 “Underlying changes in repeated reading: An eye movement study”. School Psychology Review , 42 (2), 140-156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graesser, A., McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M. & Cai, Z.
2004“Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language”. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers , 36 (2), 193-202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grissmer, D.
2000 “The continuing use and misuse of SAT scores”. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law , 6 (1), 223-232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayes, D. P.
1992 “The growing inaccessibility of science”. Nature , 356 (6372), 739-740. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 A Guide to the Lexical Analysis of Natural Texts Using QLEX or QANALYSIS. Sociology Technical Report No. 2003-1 . Ithaca, NY: Cornell University. Available at: [URL] (accessed June 2011).Google Scholar
Hayes, D. P., Wolfer, L. T. & Wolfe, M. F.
1996 “Schoolbook simplification and its relation to the decline in SAT-Verbal scores”. American Educational Research Journal , 33 (2), 489-508. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herdan, G.
1960 Type-Token Mathematics . The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1966 The Advanced Theory of Language as Choice and Chance . Berlin: Springer-Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, E. D., Jr.
2009 The Making of Americans: Democracy and Our Schools . New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hitchcock, M. E. & Tompkins, G. E.
1986“Basal readers: Are they still sexist?”. The Reading Teacher , 41 (3), 288-192.Google Scholar
Hu, M. & Nation, I. S. P.
2000“Unknown vocabulary density and reading comprehension”. Reading in a Foreign Language , 13 (1), 403-430.Google Scholar
Hyland, K. & Tse, P.
2007“Is there an ‘academic vocabulary’?”. TESOL Quarterly , 41 (2), 235-253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Itzkoff, S. W.
1994 The Decline of Intelligence in America: A Strategy for National Renewal . Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Joseph, H. S. S. S. L., Nation, K. & Liversedge, S. P.
2013 “Using eye movements to investigate word frequency effects in children’s sentence reading”. School Psychology Review , 42 (2), 207-222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kliebard, H. M.
2004 The Struggle for the American Curriculum, 1893-1958 (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B. & Ravenhorst-Kalovski, G. C.
2010“Lexical threshold revisited: Lexical text coverage, learners’ vocabulary size and reading comprehension”. Reading in a Foreign Language , 22 (1), 15-30.Google Scholar
Lu, X.
2009 “Automatic measurement of syntactic complexity in child language acquisition”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics , 14 (1), 3-28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 “Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics , 15 (4), 474-496. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012The relationship of lexical richness to the quality of ESL learners’ oral narratives. The Modern Language Journal , 96 (2), 190-208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marks, C. B., Doctorow, M. J. & Wittrock, M. C.
1974 “Word frequency and reading comprehension”. The Journal of Educational Research , 67 (6), 259-262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B.
2000 The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Magali, P.
2010“Academic vocabulary in learner writing: From extraction to analysis”. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Malvern, D., Richards, B., Chipere, N. & Durán, P.
2004 Lexical Diversity and Language Development: Quantification and Assessment . Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, M. & Schmitt, N. (Eds.)
1997 Vocabulary Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
McGregor, A. K.
1989“The effect of word frequency and social class on children’s comprehension”. Reading , 23 (2), 105-115.Google Scholar
Meunier, F. &
Gouverneur 2009. “New types of corpora for new educational challenges”. In K. Aijmer (Ed.), Corpora in Language Teaching , Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 179-201.
Michel, J.-B., Shen, Y. K., Aiden, A. P., Veres, A., Gray, M. K., The Google Books Team, Pickett, J. P., Hoiberg, D., Clancy, P. N., Orwant, J., Pinker, S., Nowak, M. A. & Aiden, E. L.
2011 “Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books”. Science , 331 (6014), 176-182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Minnen, G., Carroll, J. & Pearce, D.
2001 “Applied morphological processing of English”. Natural Language Engineering , 7 (3), 207-223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Monaghan, E. J. & Hartman, D. K.
2000“Undertaking historical research in literacy”. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (Vol. 31). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 109-121.Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P.
2006 “How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening?”, Canadian Modern Language Review , 63 (1), 59-82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nation, P. & Waring, R.
1997“Vocabulary size, text coverage and word lists”. In M. McCarthy & N. Schmitt (Eds.), Vocabulary Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 6-19.Google Scholar
Pearson, P. D.
2009“The roots of reading comprehension instruction”. In S. E. Israel & G. G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Reading Comprehension . New York: Routledge, 3-31.Google Scholar
Reyhner, J.
1986“Native Americans in basal reading textbooks: Are there enough?”. Journal of American Indian Education , 26 (1), 14-22.Google Scholar
Richards, B.
1987 “Type/token ratios: What do they really tell us?”. Journal of Child Language , 14 (2), 201-209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rupley, W. H., Garcia, J. & Longinion, B.
1987 “Sex role portrayal in reading materials: Implications for the 1980’s”. The Reading Teacher , 34 (7), 786-791.Google Scholar
Schmitt, N., Jiang, X. & Grabe, W.
2011 “The percentage of words known in a text and reading comprehension”, Modern Language Journal , 95 (1), 26-43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schoenfeld, A. H. & Pearson, P. D.
2009“The reading and math wars”. In G. Sykes, B. Schneider, D. N. Plank & T. G. Ford (Eds.), Handbook of Education Policy Research . New York: Routledge, 560-580.Google Scholar
Sykes, C. J.
1995 Dumbing down Our Kids: Why American Children Feel Good about Themselves but Can’t Read, Write, or Add . New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Tanner, D. & Tanner, L. N.
1990 History of the School Curriculum . New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Templin, M.
1957 Certain Language Skills in Children: Their Development and Interrelationships . Minneapolis, MN: The University of Minnesota Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toutanova, K., Klein, D., Manning, C. & Singer, Y.
2003 “Feature-rich part-of-speech tagging with a cyclic dependency network”. In Proceedings of the 2003 Human Language Technology Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics . Edmonton: The Association for Computational Linguistics, 252-259.Google Scholar
Venezky, R. L.
1987 “A history of the American reading textbook”. The Elementary School Journal , 87 (3), 246-265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waite, R. R.
1968 “Further attempts to integrate and urbanize first grade reading textbooks: A research study”. The Journal of Negro Education , 37 (1), 62-69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Woody, C.
1920 “The overlapping in the content of fifteen second readers”. The Journal of Educational Research , 2 (1), 465-474. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by 9 other publications

Wang, Zhongliang, Ming Liu & Kanglong Liu
2024. Utilizing Machine Learning Techniques for Classifying Translated and Non-Translated Corporate Annual Reports. Applied Artificial Intelligence 38:1 DOI logo
Wu, Anping, Fei Zhao & Qiong Zhang
2024. Construction of a text complexity grading model for English textbooks in the context of globalization. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences 9:1 DOI logo
Zhang, Xiaopeng & Xiaofei Lu
2024. Testing the Relationship of Linguistic Complexity to Second Language Learners’ Comparative Judgment on Text Difficulty. Language Learning DOI logo
Crosthwaite, Peter, Sulistya Ningrum & Martin Schweinberger
2023. Research trends in corpus linguistics. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 28:3  pp. 344 ff. DOI logo
Zhou, Xinye, Yuan Gao & Xiaofei Lu
2023. Lexical complexity changes in 100 years’ academic writing: Evidence from Nature Biology Letters. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 64  pp. 101262 ff. DOI logo
Jin, Tan, Huiqiong Duan, Xiaofei Lu, Jing Ni & Kai Guo
2021. Do research articles with more readable abstracts receive higher online attention? Evidence from Science. Scientometrics 126:10  pp. 8471 ff. DOI logo
Lu, Xiaofei & Renfen Hu
2021. Sense-aware lexical sophistication indices and their relationship to second language writing quality. Behavior Research Methods 54:3  pp. 1444 ff. DOI logo
Chen, Xiaobin & Detmar Meurers
2018. Word frequency and readability: Predicting the text‐level readability with a lexical‐level attribute. Journal of Research in Reading 41:3  pp. 486 ff. DOI logo
Chen, Xiaobin & Detmar Meurers
2019. Linking text readability and learner proficiency using linguistic complexity feature vector distance. Computer Assisted Language Learning 32:4  pp. 418 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.