Cover not available
Article published In:
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Vol. 20:2 (2015) ► pp.232–259

A quantitative approach to the grammaticalization of discourse markers

Evidence from their sequencing behavior

| University of New Mexico
| University of Vienna

This article takes a quantitative approach to the grammar of English two-part discourse marker sequences like oh well, you know I mean, etc. We investigate the internal ordering preferences of such sequences in spoken American English corpus data from the perspective of grammaticalization. From this perspective, the development of many discourse markers can be understood as involving a process of increasing syntactic de-categorialization (Hopper 1991) as the grammaticalizing element loses its original grammatical constraints and comes to function as a marker at the level of discourse. We test the hypothesis that discourse marker grammaticalization results in largely unconstrained ordering possibilities. Our analysis shows that, on the contrary, discourse marker sequencing is highly constrained. We interpret these constraints in terms of Auer’s (1996) model of discourse marker grammaticalization. Discourse marker sequencing is characterized by strong persistence of a marker’s original syntactic category and reflects its specific grammaticalization trajectory.

Keywords: discourse marker sequences, English, spoken language corpora, discourse markers, grammaticalization
Published online: 17 August 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.20.2.04koo
References
Adolphs, S., & Carter, R
(2013) Spoken Corpus Linguistics. London, UK: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aijmer, K
(2002) English Discourse Particles: Evidence from a Corpus. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) Understanding Pragmatic Markers: A Variational Pragmatic Approach. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Andersen, G
(2001) Pragmatic Markers and Sociolinguistic Variation. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Leech, G
(2002) Longman Student Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Beckman, M., Hirschberg, J., & Shattuck-Hufnagel, S
(2005) The original ToBI system and the evolution of the ToBI framework. In S.-A. Jun (Ed.), Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing (pp. 9–54). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D
(2014) Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer software]. Retrieved from [URL] (last accessed July 2014).
Brinton, L
(1996) Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) The Comment Clause in English. Syntactic Origins and Pragmatic Development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cieri, C., Graff, D., Kimball, O., Miller, D., & Walker, K
(2004a) Fisher English Training Speech Part 1, Transcripts. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
(2004b) Fisher English Training Speech Part 1, Speech. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
(2005a) Fisher English Training Speech Part 2, Transcripts. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
(2005b) Fisher English Training Speech Part 2, Speech. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
Conrad, S., & Biber, D
(2004) The Frequency and use of lexical bundles in conversation and academic prose. Lexicographica, 201, 56–71.Google Scholar
Cruttenden, A
(1997) Intonation (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, J., Schuetze-Coburn, S., Cumming, S., & Paolino, D
(1993) Outline of discourse transcription. In J. Edwards & M. Lampert (Eds.), Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research (pp. 45–89). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Du Bois, J., Chafe, W., Meyer, C., & Thompson, S
(2000) Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
Finell, A
(1989)  Well now and then. Journal of Pragmatics, 13(4), 653–656. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fitzmaurice, S
(2004) Subjectivity, intersubjectivity and the historical construction of interlocutor stance: From stance markers to discourse markers. Discourse Studies, 6(4), 427–448. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraser, B
(2011) The sequencing of contrastive discourse markers in English. Baltic Journal of English Language, Literature, and Culture, 11, 29–35.Google Scholar
Hirschberg, J. & Litman, D
(1993) Empirical studies on the disambiguation of cue phrases. Computational Linguistics, 19(3), 501–530.Google Scholar
Hopper, P
(1991) On some principles of grammaticalization. In E. Traugott & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization (Vol. 11, pp. 17–35). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, O
(1968) The Philosophy of Grammar. London, UK: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Jucker, A
(1997) The discourse marker well in the history of English. English Language and Linguistics, 1(1), 91–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knott, A
(1996) A data-driven methodology for motivating a set of coherence relations. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.Google Scholar
Koops, C., & Lohmann, A
in press). Discourse marker sequencing and grammaticalization. In Baier, N., Donnelly, E., Faytak, M., Giroux, J., Goss, M., Heath, J., Merrill, J., Neely, K., & Redeye, M (Eds.) Proceedings of the Thirty-Ninth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society Berkeley, CA Berkeley Linguistics Society DOI logo
Levelt, W., & Cutler, A
(1983) Prosodic marking in speech repair. Journal of Semantics, 2(2), 205–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lutzky, U
(2012) Discourse Markers in Early Modern English. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, S
(2005) Discourse Markers in Native and Non-native English Discourse. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oates, S
(2000) Multiple discourse marker occurrence: Creating hierarchies for natural language generation. In Kilgarriff, A., Pearce, D., & Tiberius, C. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third Computational Linguistics UK (CLUK) Colloquium (pp. 41–45). University of Brighton and University of Sussex, UK.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J
(1980) The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
R Core Team
(2014) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [Computer software]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from [URL] (last accessed July 2014).Google Scholar
Romaine, S., & Lange, D
(1991) The use of like as a marker of reported speech and thought: A case of grammaticalization in progress. American Speech, 66(3), 227–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, D
(1987) Discourse Markers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001) Discourse markers: Language, meaning, and context. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen & H. Hamilton (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 54–75). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schourup, L
(1999) Tutorial overview: Discourse markers. Lingua, 107(3-4), 227–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Svartvik, J
(1980)  Well in conversation. In S. Greenbaum, G. Leech & J. Svartvik (Eds.), Studies in English Linguistics for Randolph Quirk (pp. 167–177). London, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Thompson, S., & Mulac, A
(1991) The discourse conditions for the use of the complementizer that in conversational English. Journal of Pragmatics, 15(3), 237–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 21 other publications

Blanchard, Meaghan & Lieven Buysse
2021. Like in Discourse Marker Combinations in Spoken Interaction. Corpus Pragmatics 5:4 ► pp. 463 ff. DOI logo
Bourgeois, Samuel
2022. “Oh yeah, one more thing: It’s gonna be huge.”. In Broadening the Spectrum of Corpus Linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 105], ► pp. 196 ff. DOI logo
Crible, Ludivine & Liesbeth Degand
2021. Co-occurrence and ordering of discourse markers in sequences: A multifactorial study in spoken French. Journal of Pragmatics 177 ► pp. 18 ff. DOI logo
Cuenca, Maria Josep & Ludivine Crible
2019. Co-occurrence of discourse markers in English: From juxtaposition to composition. Journal of Pragmatics 140 ► pp. 171 ff. DOI logo
Dobrovoljc, Kaja
2017. Multi-word discourse markers and their corpus-driven identification. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22:4 ► pp. 551 ff. DOI logo
Faller, Martina
2020. The many functions of Cuzco Quechua =<i>pas</i>: implications for the semantic map of additivity. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 5:1 DOI logo
Haselow, Alexander
2019. Discourse marker sequences: Insights into the serial order of communicative tasks in real-time turn production. Journal of Pragmatics 146 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Haselow, Alexander
2020. Chapter 8. Local and global structures in discourse and interaction. In Grammar and Cognition [Human Cognitive Processing, 70], ► pp. 267 ff. DOI logo
Izutsu, Katsunobu & Mitsuko Narita Izutsu
2021. Chapter 3. Presentation followed by negotiation. In Pragmatic Markers and Peripheries [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 325], ► pp. 77 ff. DOI logo
Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita & Katsunobu Izutsu
2021. Very simple, though, isn't it? Pragmatic marker sequencing at the right periphery. Journal of Pragmatics 182 ► pp. 118 ff. DOI logo
Koops, Christian & Arne Lohmann
2022. Explaining reversible discourse marker sequences: A case study of and and so. Journal of Pragmatics 191 ► pp. 156 ff. DOI logo
Lohmann, Arne & Christian Koops
2016. Aspects of discourse marker sequencing. In Outside the Clause [Studies in Language Companion Series, 178], ► pp. 417 ff. DOI logo
Lohmann, Arne & Christian Koops
2022. Pragmatic marker combinations: Introduction. Journal of Pragmatics 196 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Macário Lopes, Ana Cristina & Conceição Carapinha
2017. Por outras palavras e digamos: marcadores de reformulación?. Revista Galega de Filoloxía 18 ► pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Mohammadi, Ariana N.
2019. Meaning potentials and discourse markers: The case of focus management markers in Persian. Lingua 229 ► pp. 102706 ff. DOI logo
Mycock, Louise & Chi Lun Pang
2021. Funny that isn't it ProTags in combination at the right periphery. Journal of Pragmatics 182 ► pp. 92 ff. DOI logo
Pinto, Derrin & Donny Vigil
2020. Spanish clicks in discourse marker combinations. Journal of Pragmatics 159 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Pons Bordería, Salvador
2018. The combination of discourse markers in spontaneous conversations. Revue Romane. Langue et littérature. International Journal of Romance Languages and Literatures 53:1 ► pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Shirtz, Shahar
2021. And now, co-occurrence and functionality of discourse markers on the Oregon Coast. Journal of Pragmatics 185 ► pp. 164 ff. DOI logo
Van Olmen, Daniël & Jolanta Šinkūnienė
2021. Introduction. Pragmatic markers and peripheries. In Pragmatic Markers and Peripheries [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 325], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Discourse Structuring Markers in English [Constructional Approaches to Language, 33], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.