Article published In:
International Journal of Corpus LinguisticsVol. 20:2 (2015) ► pp.232–259
A quantitative approach to the grammaticalization of discourse markers
Evidence from their sequencing behavior
This article takes a quantitative approach to the grammar of English two-part discourse marker sequences like oh well, you know I mean, etc. We investigate the internal ordering preferences of such sequences in spoken American English corpus data from the perspective of grammaticalization. From this perspective, the development of many discourse markers can be understood as involving a process of increasing syntactic de-categorialization (Hopper 1991) as the grammaticalizing element loses its original grammatical constraints and comes to function as a marker at the level of discourse. We test the hypothesis that discourse marker grammaticalization results in largely unconstrained ordering possibilities. Our analysis shows that, on the contrary, discourse marker sequencing is highly constrained. We interpret these constraints in terms of Auer’s (1996) model of discourse marker grammaticalization. Discourse marker sequencing is characterized by strong persistence of a marker’s original syntactic category and reflects its specific grammaticalization trajectory.
References (40)
Adolphs, S., & Carter, R. (2013). Spoken Corpus Linguistics. London, UK: Routledge. 
Aijmer, K. (2002). English Discourse Particles: Evidence from a Corpus. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Benjamins.
. (2013). Understanding Pragmatic Markers: A Variational Pragmatic Approach. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
Andersen, G. (2001). Pragmatic Markers and Sociolinguistic Variation. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Benjamins.
Auer, P. (1996). The pre-front field in spoken German and its relevance as a grammaticalization position. Pragmatics, 6(3), 295–322.
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Leech, G. (2002). Longman Student Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London, UK: Longman.
Beckman, M., Hirschberg, J., & Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (2005). The original ToBI system and the evolution of the ToBI framework. In S.-A. Jun (Ed.), Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing (pp. 9–54). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2014). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer software]. Retrieved from [URL] (last accessed July 2014).
Brinton, L. (1996). Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
. (2008). The Comment Clause in English. Syntactic Origins and Pragmatic Development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Cieri, C., Graff, D., Kimball, O., Miller, D., & Walker, K. (2004a). Fisher English Training Speech Part 1, Transcripts. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.
. (2004b). Fisher English Training Speech Part 1, Speech. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.
. (2005a). Fisher English Training Speech Part 2, Transcripts. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.
. (2005b). Fisher English Training Speech Part 2, Speech. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.
Conrad, S., & Biber, D. (2004). The Frequency and use of lexical bundles in conversation and academic prose. Lexicographica, 201, 56–71.
Cruttenden, A. (1997). Intonation (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Dehé, N., & Wichmann, A. (2010). Sentence-initial I think (that) and I believe (that): Prosodic evidence for use as main clause, comment clause and discourse marker. Studies in Language, 34(1), 36–74.
Du Bois, J., Schuetze-Coburn, S., Cumming, S., & Paolino, D. (1993). Outline of discourse transcription. In J. Edwards & M. Lampert (Eds.), Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research (pp. 45–89). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Du Bois, J., Chafe, W., Meyer, C., & Thompson, S. (2000). Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.
Finell, A. (1989).
Well now and then. Journal of Pragmatics, 13(4), 653–656.
Fitzmaurice, S. (2004). Subjectivity, intersubjectivity and the historical construction of interlocutor stance: From stance markers to discourse markers. Discourse Studies, 6(4), 427–448.
Fraser, B. (2011). The sequencing of contrastive discourse markers in English. Baltic Journal of English Language, Literature, and Culture, 11, 29–35.
Hirschberg, J. & Litman, D. (1993). Empirical studies on the disambiguation of cue phrases. Computational Linguistics, 19(3), 501–530.
Hopper, P. (1991). On some principles of grammaticalization. In E. Traugott & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization (Vol. 11, pp. 17–35). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Benjamins.
Jespersen, O. (1968). The Philosophy of Grammar. London, UK: George Allen & Unwin.
Jucker, A. (1997). The discourse marker well in the history of English. English Language and Linguistics, 1(1), 91–110.
Knott, A. (1996). A data-driven methodology for motivating a set of coherence relations. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Koops, C., & Lohmann, A. (in press). Discourse marker sequencing and grammaticalization. In Baier, N., Donnelly, E., Faytak, M., Giroux, J., Goss, M., Heath, J., Merrill, J., Neely, K., & Redeye, M. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Thirty-Ninth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Levelt, W., & Cutler, A. (1983). Prosodic marking in speech repair. Journal of Semantics, 2(2), 205–217.
Lutzky, U. (2012). Discourse Markers in Early Modern English. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Benjamins.
Müller, S. (2005). Discourse Markers in Native and Non-native English Discourse. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Benjamins.
Oates, S. (2000). Multiple discourse marker occurrence: Creating hierarchies for natural language generation. In Kilgarriff, A., Pearce, D., & Tiberius, C. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third Computational Linguistics UK (CLUK) Colloquium (pp. 41–45). University of Brighton and University of Sussex, UK.
Pierrehumbert, J. (1980). The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
R Core Team. (2014). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [Computer software]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from [URL] (last accessed July 2014).
Romaine, S., & Lange, D. (1991). The use of like as a marker of reported speech and thought: A case of grammaticalization in progress. American Speech, 66(3), 227–279.
Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse Markers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
. (2001). Discourse markers: Language, meaning, and context. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen & H. Hamilton (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 54–75). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Schourup, L. (1999). Tutorial overview: Discourse markers. Lingua, 107(3-4), 227–265.
Svartvik, J. (1980).
Well in conversation. In S. Greenbaum, G. Leech & J. Svartvik (Eds.), Studies in English Linguistics for Randolph Quirk (pp. 167–177). London, UK: Longman.
Thompson, S., & Mulac, A. (1991). The discourse conditions for the use of the complementizer that in conversational English. Journal of Pragmatics, 15(3), 237–251.
Cited by (23)
Cited by 23 other publications
Zuo, Shan & Fuyin Li
2024. Review of Traugott (2022): Ten Lectures on a Diachronic Constructionalist Approach to Discourse Structuring Markers. Language and Linguistics. 語言暨語言學 
Salih, Sana’Khalifa
2023. The Effects of Textual Input Enhancement and Inputflooding on the Comprehension and Retention of Macro/ Micro Discourse Markers Functions among Iraqi University EFL Students. Journal of Tikrit University for Humanities 30:9, 1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Bourgeois, Samuel
2022. “Oh yeah, one more thing: It’s gonna be huge.”. In Broadening the Spectrum of Corpus Linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 105], ► pp. 196 ff.
Koops, Christian & Arne Lohmann
2022. Explaining reversible discourse marker sequences: A case study of and and so. Journal of Pragmatics 191 ► pp. 156 ff.
Blanchard, Meaghan & Lieven Buysse
2021. Like in Discourse Marker Combinations in Spoken Interaction. Corpus Pragmatics 5:4 ► pp. 463 ff.
Crible, Ludivine & Liesbeth Degand
2021. Co-occurrence and ordering of discourse markers in sequences: A multifactorial study in spoken French. Journal of Pragmatics 177 ► pp. 18 ff.
Izutsu, Katsunobu & Mitsuko Narita Izutsu
2021. Chapter 3. Presentation followed by negotiation. In Pragmatic Markers and Peripheries [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 325], ► pp. 77 ff.
Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita & Katsunobu Izutsu
2021. Very simple, though, isn't it? Pragmatic marker sequencing at the right periphery. Journal of Pragmatics 182 ► pp. 118 ff.
Mycock, Louise & Chi Lun Pang
2021. Funny that isn't it ProTags in combination at the right periphery. Journal of Pragmatics 182 ► pp. 92 ff.
Shirtz, Shahar
2021. And now, co-occurrence and functionality of discourse markers on the Oregon Coast. Journal of Pragmatics 185 ► pp. 164 ff.
Van Olmen, Daniël & Jolanta Šinkūnienė
2021. Introduction. Pragmatic markers and peripheries. In Pragmatic Markers and Peripheries [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 325], ► pp. 1 ff.
Faller, Martina
2020. The many functions of Cuzco Quechua =<i>pas</i>: implications for the semantic map of additivity. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 5:1
Pinto, Derrin & Donny Vigil
2020. Spanish clicks in discourse marker combinations. Journal of Pragmatics 159 ► pp. 1 ff.
Cuenca, Maria Josep & Ludivine Crible
2019. Co-occurrence of discourse markers in English: From juxtaposition to composition. Journal of Pragmatics 140 ► pp. 171 ff.
Haselow, Alexander
2019. Discourse marker sequences: Insights into the serial order of communicative tasks in real-time turn production. Journal of Pragmatics 146 ► pp. 1 ff.
Haselow, Alexander
2020. Chapter 8. Local and global structures in discourse and interaction. In Grammar and Cognition [Human Cognitive Processing, 70], ► pp. 267 ff.
Mohammadi, Ariana N.
2019. Meaning potentials and discourse markers: The case of focus management markers in Persian. Lingua 229 ► pp. 102706 ff.
Pons Bordería, Salvador
2018. The combination of discourse markers in spontaneous conversations. Revue Romane. Langue et littérature. International Journal of Romance Languages and Literatures 53:1 ► pp. 121 ff.
Dobrovoljc, Kaja
2017. Multi-word discourse markers and their corpus-driven identification. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22:4 ► pp. 551 ff.
Macário Lopes, Ana Cristina & Conceição Carapinha
2017. Por outras palavras e digamos: marcadores de reformulación?. Revista Galega de Filoloxía 18 ► pp. 115 ff.
Lohmann, Arne & Christian Koops
2016. Aspects of discourse marker sequencing. In Outside the Clause [Studies in Language Companion Series, 178], ► pp. 417 ff.
Lohmann, Arne & Christian Koops
2022. Pragmatic marker combinations: Introduction. Journal of Pragmatics 196 ► pp. 1 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.