Article published In:
International Journal of Corpus LinguisticsVol. 7:1 (2002) ► pp.65–85
Understanding Direct Mail Letters as a genre
What makes non-profit, philanthropic discourse so persuasive has not been well explored to date. Using a specialized corpus of direct-mail letters from philanthropic organizations in five different fields, this study seeks to combine the tools of corpus analysis with the specificity of genre analysis in a way that has not been done before to provide a new perspective on a genre that is not well understood. The underlying goal is to look for a methodology that will provide much of the qualitative detail that is common to genre analysis, while at the same time providing the reliability that is best assured by the quantitative power of computerized corpus analysis. Using Bhatia's approach to genre analysis (1993) and his exploratory efforts in investigating fundraising discourse (1997, 1998) as a foundation, key patterns in the rhetorical structure of direct-mail letters revealed through a large-scale corpus analysis are presented.
Keywords: philanthropy, fundraising discourse, direct mail, genre analysis
Cited by (40)
Cited by 40 other publications
Akoto, Osei Yaw, Benjamin Amoakohene & Juliet Oppong-Asare Ansah
2024. “I have known….” A Corpus-driven Study of Personal Pronouns in Letters of Recommendation in an L2 Context. E-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences ► pp. 974 ff. 
Orabi, Hebatullah A
2024. Aircraft accident reports: A corpus-based genre analysis. Discourse & Communication 18:2 ► pp. 290 ff.
Ayitey, Henry Kwao, Obed Nii Broohm & Gladys Mimmie Edjah
2022. Genre Analysis of Chief Examiners’ Reports from Selected Colleges of Education in Ghana. E-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences ► pp. 115 ff.
Mason, Marianne
2022. Examining the rhetorical structure and discursive features of letters of leniency as a genre. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 111 ff.
Crosthwaite, Peter, Alicia Gazmuri Sanhueza & Martin Schweinberger
2021. Training disciplinary genre awareness through blended learning: An exploration into EAP students’ perceptions of online annotation of genres across disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 53 ► pp. 101021 ff.
McGee, Iain
2021. The Textual Management of the Solicit Response Move in Newspaper Fundraising Advertisements. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing 33:3 ► pp. 265 ff.
Sun, Kun, Rong Wang & Wenxin Xiong
2021. Investigating genre distinctions through discourse distance and discourse network. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 17:3 ► pp. 599 ff.
Morrow, Phillip R. & Kenta Yamanouchi
2020. Online apologies to hotel guests in English and Japanese. Discourse, Context & Media 34 ► pp. 100379 ff.
Biber, Douglas & Susan Conrad
2019. Register, Genre, and Style,
Cotos, Elena
2019. Articulating societal benefits in grant proposals: Move analysis of Broader Impacts. English for Specific Purposes 54 ► pp. 15 ff.
Ye, Yunping
2019. Macrostructures and rhetorical moves in energy engineering research articles written by Chinese expert writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 38 ► pp. 48 ff.
Ferrari, Federica
2018. In lack of ‘Will’? Strategic ‘Future-ness’ and Barack Obama’s experiment: From intention negotiation to will creation and political action in Barack Obama’s e-mail campaigning. Time & Society 27:2 ► pp. 195 ff.
VERONICO, N. TARRAYO
2018. BEAUTY IN BREVITY: CAPTURING THE NARRATIVE STRUCTURE OF FLASH FICTION BY FILIPINO WRITERS. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching 8:2 ► pp. 36 ff.
López Arroyo, Belén & Roda P. Roberts
2017. Genre and Register in Comparable Corpora: An English/Spanish Contrastive Analysis. Meta 62:1 ► pp. 114 ff.
Melliti, Mimoun
2017. Evaluation of Generic Structure of Research Letters Body Section: Create a Research Letter Body Section Model. In Evaluation in Foreign Language Education in the Middle East and North Africa [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 127 ff.
Pizarro Sánchez, Isabel
2017. Chapter 9. A corpus-based analysis of genre-specific multi-word combinations. In Cross-linguistic Correspondences [Studies in Language Companion Series, 191], ► pp. 221 ff.
Lipovsky, Caroline
2016. Negotiating solidarity with potential donors: a study of the images in fundraising letters by not-for-profit organizations. Functional Linguistics 3:1
Bremner, Stephen & Ban Phung
2015. Learning From the Experts: An Analysis of Résumé Writers' Self-Presentation on LinkedIn. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 58:4 ► pp. 367 ff.
Casañ-Pitarch, Ricardo & José Ramón Calvo-Ferrer
2015. Developing Writing Skills in The Classroom: A Corpus-based Analysis of Multi-Genre Structures. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 198 ► pp. 74 ff.
Dr Tanweer Ali, Kotwal, Ashok & Kate Power
2015. Eating words: a discourse historical analysis of the public debate over India’s 2013 National Food Security Act. On the Horizon 23:3 ► pp. 174 ff.
Temmerman, Martina
2014. Chapter 8. “Trust us: Bootcamp Pilates does not sound half as hard as it is, but it works”. In Trust and Discourse [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 56], ► pp. 161 ff.
van der Vliet, Nynke & Gisela Redeker
2014. Explicit and implicit coherence relations in Dutch texts. In The Pragmatics of Discourse Coherence [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 254], ► pp. 23 ff.
Zhang, Yi & Camilla Vásquez
2014. Hotels׳ responses to online reviews: Managing consumer dissatisfaction. Discourse, Context & Media 6 ► pp. 54 ff.
Mehrpour, Saeed & Mohaddeseh Mehrzad
2013. A Comparative Genre Analysis of English Business E-mails Written by Iranians and Native English Speakers. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 3:12
Sadeghi, Vahid & Moses Samuel
2013. Genre analysis of the letters of appeal. Discourse Studies 15:2 ► pp. 229 ff.
Hyland, Ken
2012. Genre and Discourse Analysis in Language for Specific Purposes. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Hyland, Ken
2018. Genre and Discourse Analysis in Language for Specific Purposes. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 1 ff.
Singh, Manvender Kaur Sarjit, Sarimah Shamsudin & Yasmin Hanafi Zaid
2012. Revisiting Genre Analysis: Applying Vijay Bhatia's Approach. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 66 ► pp. 370 ff.
Goering, Elizabeth, Ulla M. Connor, Ed Nagelhout & Richard Steinberg
2011. Persuasion in Fundraising Letters: An Interdisciplinary Study. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 40:2 ► pp. 228 ff.
Upton, Thomas A. & Mary Ann Cohen
2009. An approach to corpus-based discourse analysis: The move analysis as example. Discourse Studies 11:5 ► pp. 585 ff.
Crossley, Scott
2007. A chronotopic approach to genre analysis: An exploratory study. English for Specific Purposes 26:1 ► pp. 4 ff.
Fusari, Sabrina
2007. The Discourse of Philanthropy in Italy and The United States: A Case Study of Interparadigmatic Translation.. Journal of Intercultural Communication 7:2 ► pp. 1 ff.
Fusari, Sabrina
2009. “Filantropia” or “Non Profit”? Translating Texts on Nonprofits from English into Italian. Meta 54:1 ► pp. 97 ff.
Fusari, Sabrina
2009. Between English Humour and National Stereotypes – Translating Stephen Clarke’s Novel Merde Happens into Italian. Journal of Intercultural Communication 9:2 ► pp. 1 ff.
Fusari, Sabrina
2021. Chapter 10. Student-teacher e-mail interaction as asynchronous dialogue in an academic setting. In Language and Social Interaction at Home and School [Dialogue Studies, 32], ► pp. 351 ff.
Sharoff, S. & A. Secară
2007. Who is talking to whom? Linguistic cues for engaging with the audience. CoDesign 3:sup1 ► pp. 175 ff.
Barron, Anne
2006. Understanding spam: A macro-textual analysis. Journal of Pragmatics 38:6 ► pp. 880 ff.
Barron, Anne
2006. Click Here to Shop Now!: A micro-linguistic analysis of medical spam mails. In Innovative Wirtschaftskommunikation, ► pp. 209 ff.
Kaufer, D. & S. Ishizaki
2006. A Corpus Study of Canned Letters: Mining the Latent Rhetorical Proficiencies Marketed to Writers-in-a-Hurry and Non-Writers. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 49:3 ► pp. 254 ff.
Flowerdew, Lynne
2005. An integration of corpus-based and genre-based approaches to text analysis in EAP/ESP: countering criticisms against corpus-based methodologies. English for Specific Purposes 24:3 ► pp. 321 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.