Article published In:
Interactional LinguisticsVol. 1:1 (2021) ► pp.64–89
“You turn your back and there’s somebody moving in”
Syntactic anacrusis in spoken English
Anacrustic Coordination (AC) is a type of biclausal conjunction such that an initial clause or phrase sets up a state of affairs and is followed by and and a strongly focused second clause, for example three years it’s been sitting here and I haven’t done it. AC figures in a number of kinds of interaction. One is the topic/comment conditional, as in call it up and there’s something that actually says your number. It is a possibility for enhancing certain illocutionary acts such as threats and warnings: I’m gonna take that and I’m gonna dig it into you. It is a basis for syntactic mirativity, the coding of surprise and unexpectedness (DeLancey 1997): you turn your back and there’s somebody moving in. AC raises questions about the nature of constructions and of Construction Grammar.
Keywords: coordination, anacrustic/anacrusis, emergent grammar, biclausal, construction, boosting, conditional, speech acts, mirativity, style
Article outline
- 1.Introduction: Coordination with and
- 2.Constructions in spoken language
- 2.1Constructions
- 2.2Constructions in Conversational Data
- 3.Anacrustic Coordination
- 3.1Syntactic Anacrusis
- 3.2Structuration of the anacrusis
- 3.3Co-construction of anacrustic coordination
- 4.Semantics and pragmatics of anacrustic coordination
- 4.1Speech acts
- 4.2Conditional
- 4.3Mirativity
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
- Symbols used in transcripts
-
References
This article is available free of charge.
References
Aichenvald, A.
(2012) The
essence of mirativity. Linguistic
Typology 16,3:435–85. 
Auer, P.
(2000) On-line-Syntax,
oder was es bedeuten könnte, die Zeitlichkeit der gesprochenen Sprache ernst zu nehmen. Sprache
und Literatur 851:43–56.
(2009) On
line syntax: some thoughts on the temporality of spoken language. Language
Sciences 311:1–13.
(2015) The
temporality of language in interaction: Projection and
Latency. In A. Deppermann and S. Günthner (Eds.), 27–56.
Barth-Weingarten, D.
(2014) Dialogism
and the emergence of final particles: The case of
and
. In S. Günthner, W. Imo & J. Bücker (Eds.), Grammar
and Dialogism: Sequential, Syntactic, and Prosodic Patterns between Emergence and
Sedimentation, 335–66. Berlin: De Gruyter. (Linguistik: Impulse & Tendenzen, 61)
Barth-Weingarten, D. & Couper-Kuhlen, E.
(2011) Action,
prosody and emergent constructions: the case of
and
. In P. Auer & S. Pfänder, Constructions:
Emerging and
Emergent, 263–292. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Bolduc, M. K. & Frank, D. A.
(2010) Chaïm
Perelman and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca’s ‘On Temporality as a Characteristic of Argumentation’: Commentary and
Translation. Philosophy and
Rhetoric 43 (4): 308–315.
Collins, P. C.
(1994) Cleft
and Pseudocleft Constructions in
English. London: Routledge.
DeLancey, S.
(1997) Mirativity:
The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic
Typology 11: 33–52.
Deppermann, A., & Günthner, S.
(2015) Introduction:
Temporality in interaction. In A. Deppermann & S. Günthner (Eds.), Temporality
in
Interaction, 1–26. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Du Bois, J. W., Chafe, W. L., Meyer, C., Thompson, S. A., Englebretson, R., & Martey, N.
(2000–2005) The
Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Parts
1–4. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.
Du Bois, J.
(2014) Towards
a dialogic syntax. Cognitive
Linguistics 25,3: 359–410.
Fielder, G. E.
(2008) Bulgarian
adversative connectives: Conjunctions or discourse
particles? In R. Laury (Ed.), 79–98. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Givón, T.
Green, M.
Günthner, S.
(2011) Between
emergence and sedimentation: Projecting constructions in German
interactions. In P. Auer and S. Pfänder (Eds.), Constructions:
Emergent and
Emerging, 156–185. Berlin: De Gruyter.
(2015) A
temporally oriented perspective on connectors in interaction: und zwar (‘namely/in fact’) constructions in
everyday German conversations. In A. Deppermann & S. Günthner (Eds.), Temporality
in
Interaction, 237–264. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 237–64.
Günthner, S., & Hopper, P. J.
(2010) Zeitlichkeit
und sprachliche Struktur: Pseudoclefts im Englischen und
Deutschen. Gesprächsforschung 111:1–28. [URL]
Haiman, J.
(1978) Conditionals
are
topics. Language 541:565–589.
Haspelmath, M.
(Ed.) (2004) Coordinating
Constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (Typological Studies in Language 58)
Hopper, P. J.
(1987) Emergent
Grammar. Berkeley Linguistic
Society 131:139–157.
(2001) Grammatical
Constructions and their Discourse Origins: Prototype or Family
Resemblance? In M. Pütz & S. Niemeier (Eds.), Applied
Cognitive Linguistics: Theory, Acquisition, and Language
Pedagogy 109–30. Berlin: Mouton/De Gruyter.
(2002) Hendiadys
and auxiliation in English. In J. Bybee and M. Noonan (Eds.), Complex
Sentences in Grammar and
Discourse, 145–173. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2004) The
openness of grammatical constructions. Chicago Linguistic
Society 401:153–175.
(2007) Emergent
serialization in English: Pragmatics and typology. In J. Good (Ed.), Language
Universals and Language
Change, 520–554. London: Oxford University Press.
(2011) Emergent
Grammar and Temporality in Interactional Linguistics. In P. Auer & S. Pfänder (Eds.), Constructions:
Emerging and
Emergent, 22–44. Berlin: De Gruyter.
(2012) Emergent
Grammar. In J. P. Gee & M. Handford (Eds.), The
Routledge Handbook of Discourse
Analysis, 301–315. London/New York: Routledge.
(2019) Timely
Notes on Saussure and Hermann Paul after 1968. In H. Boas & M. Pierce (Eds.), New
Directions in Historical
Linguistics, 78–109. Leiden: Brill.
Hyland, Kenneth
(1998) Boosting,
hedging and the negotiation of academic
knowledge. Text 18,3:349–382.
Keevallik, L.
(2020) Grammatical
coordination of embodied action: The Estonian ja ‘and’ as a temporal organizer of Pilates
moves. In Y. Maschler, S. Pekarek Doehler, J. Lindström, & L. Keevallik (Eds.), Emergent
Syntax for Conversation: Clausal Patterns and the Organization of
action, 221–244. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kuteva, T.
(2004) Auxiliation:
An Enquiry into the Nature of Grammaticalization. Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, R.
(1971) If’s,
and’s and but’s about conjunction. In C. J. Fillmore & D. T. Langendoen (Eds.), Studies
in Linguistic
Semantics, 115–149. NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Laury, R.
(Ed.) (2008) Crosslinguistic
Studies of Clause Combining: The Multifunctionality of
Conjunctions. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Maschler, Y.
Matthiessen, C., & Thompson, S. A.
(1988) The
structure of discourse and ‘subordination’. In J. Haiman & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Clause
Combining in Grammar and
Discourse, 275–328. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Paul, H.
(1920) Prinzipien
der
Sprachgeschichte. 51. Auflage. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Pawley, A. & Syder, F. H.
(2000) The
one clause at a time hypothesis. In H. Riggenbach (Ed.), Perspectives
on fluency, 163–199. Ann Arbor: U. of Michigan Press.
Pekarek Doehler, S., De Stefani, E., & Horlacher, A.-S.
(2015) Time
and Emergence in Grammar: Dislocation, Topicalization and Hanging Topic in French
Talk-in-Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L.
(1958) De
la temporalité comme caractère de l’argumentation. Archivio di
filosofia 28 (2): 115–33.
Prince, E.
(1978) A
comparison of WH- and IT clefts in
discourse. Language 541:883–906.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J.
(1985) A
Comprehensive Grammar of the English
Language. London: Longman.
Schiffrin, D.
(1986) Functions
of and in discourse. Journal of
Pragmatics 101:41–46.
Schmerling, S.
(1974) Asymmetric
conjunction and rules of conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Speech
Acts. Syntax and
Semantics 31:211–231. Academic Press.
Thompson, S. A. & Hopper, P. J.
(2009) Projectability
and Clause Combining in Interaction. In R. Laury, (Ed.), Crosslinguistic
Studies of Clause
Combining 99–123. Amsterdam: Benjamins.