Review published In:
Interpreting
Vol. 8:2 (2006) ► pp.235240
References (13)
References
AIIC (2002). Code for the use of new technologies in conference interpretation. Retrieved from: [URL] (accessed 25 June 2006).Google Scholar
EP (2001a). Report on remote interpretation test, 22–25 January 2001. Unpublished internal report. Brussels: European Parliament, Working Party on New Technologies of the Interpretation Directorate.Google Scholar
(2001b). Report on remote interpretation test, 3–6 December 2001. Unpublished internal report. Brussels: European Parliament, Working Party on New Technologies of the Interpretation Directorate.Google Scholar
ETSI (1993). Study of ISDN videotelephony for conference interpreters. Draft final report. Sophia Antipolis, France: European Telecommunications Standards Institute.Google Scholar
Höflich, J. (1996). Technisch vermittelte interpersonale Kommunikation: Grundlagen, organisatorische Medienverwendung, Konstitution “elektronischer Gemeinschaften”. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Isaacs, E. & Tang, J. (1997). Studying video-based collaboration in context: From small workgroups to large organizations. In K. Finn, A. Sellen, & S. Wilbur (Eds.), Video-mediated communication. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 173–197.Google Scholar
Kade, O. (1968). Zufall und Gesetzmässigkeit in der Übersetzung. (Beihefte zur Zeitschrift Fremdsprachen 11). Leipzig: Verlag Enzyklopädie.Google Scholar
Kalina, S. (1998). Strategien und Prozesse beim Dolmetschen. Theoretische Grundlagen, empirische Fallstudien, didaktische Konsequenzen. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Kirchhoff, H. (1976). Das Simultandolmetschen: Interdependenz der Variablen im Dol-metschprozess, Dolmetschmodelle und Dolmetschstrategien. In H. Drescher & S. Scheff-zek (Eds.), Theorie und Praxis des Übersetzens und Dolmetschens. Bern: Lang, 59–71.Google Scholar
Moser-Mercer, B. (2005a). Remote interpreting. The crucial role of presence. Bulletin Suisse de Linguistique Appliquée 811, 73–97.Google Scholar
(2005b). Remote interpreting: Issues of multi-sensory integration in a multilingual task. Meta 50 (2), 727–738. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mouzourakis, P. (2006). Remote interpreting: A technical perspective on recent experiments. Interpreting 8 (1), 45–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
UN (2001). The second full scale experiment in remote interpreting in the United Nations (New York), April 16–27, 2001. New York: United Nations, Department of General Assembly Affairs and Conference Services.Google Scholar