Article published In:
(Im)politeness and Moral Order in Online Interactions
Edited by Chaoqun Xie
[Internet Pragmatics 1:2] 2018
► pp. 329351
References (52)
References
Aristotle. 2002a. Rhetorik (trans. and comm. by Christoph Rapp). Berlin: Akademie Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002b. Nikomachische Ethik (trans. and comm. by Ursula Wolf). Darmstadt: Wiss. Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Banks, James. 2010. “Regulating hate speech online.” International Review of Law, Computers & Technology 24(3): 233–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bosch, Nikolaus. 2016. “Hassbotschaften und Hetze im Internet als Aufforderung zu Straftaten?” [Hate messages and rabble-rousing in the internet as incitement to criminal offences?] Juristische Ausbildung 41: 381–389.Google Scholar
Brodnig, Ingrid. 2016. Hass im Netz. Wien: Brandstätter.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 1996. “Towards an anatomy of impoliteness.” Journal of Pragmatics 25(3): 349–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. “Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show: The Weakest Link .” Journal of Politeness Research 1(1): 35–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, Derek Bousfield, and Anne Wichmann. 2003. “Impoliteness revisited: With special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects.” Journal of Pragmatics 35(10–11): 1545–1579. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deumert, Ana. 2014. “The performance of a ludic self on social network(ing) sites.” In The Language of Social Media, ed. by Philip Seargeant, and Caroline Tagg, 23–45. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dittler, Ullrich, and Michael Hoyer (eds.). 2014. Social Network – Die Revolution der Kommunikation. München: Kopaed.Google Scholar
Duggan, Maeve. 2014. Online Harassment. Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center. [URL] (accessed 11 July 2017).
Gordon, Robert W. 2001. “Legalizing outrage.” In Aftermath. The Clinton Impeachment and the Presidency in the Age of Political Spectacle, ed. by Leonard V. Kaplan, and Beverly I. Moran, 97–112. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Graham, Sage L. 2008. “A manual for (im)politeness?: The impact of the FAQ in an electronic community of Practice.” In Impoliteness in Language, ed. by Derek Bousfield, and Miriam A. Locher, 281–304. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Graham, Sage L., and Claire Hardaker. 2017. “(Im)politeness in digital communication.” In Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, ed. by Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 785–814. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Groarke, Leo, Catherine H. Palczewski, and David Godden. 2016. “Navigating the visual turn in argument.” Argumentation and Advocacy 52(4): 217–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haidt, Jonathan, and Selin Kesebir. 2010. “Morality.” In Handbook of Social Psychology, ed. by Susan T. Fiske, Daniel T. Gilbert, and Gardner Lindzey, 797–852. Hoboken, N. J.: Wiley. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael, Wei-Lin Melody Chang, and Dániel Z. Kádár. 2015. “‘Doing deference’: Identities and relational practices in Chinese online discussion boards.” Pragmatics 25(1): 73–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ihnatko, Andy (1997). Cyberspeak. An Online Dictionary. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z. 2017. Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z., and Michael Haugh. 2013. Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kienpointner, Manfred. 1992. Alltagslogik. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
. 1996. “Structural semantics and Latin linguistics.” In Aspects of Latin, ed. by Hannah Rosén, 603–617. Innsbruck: Verlag des Instituts für Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
. 1997. “Varieties of rudeness: Types and functions of impolite utterances.” Functions of Language 4 (2): 251–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. “Zum Wortfeld ‘Liebe-Haß’ im Altgriechischen.” In Studia Celtica et Indogermanica, ed. by Peter Anreiter, and Erzsébet Jerem, 163–177. Budapest: Archäolingua.Google Scholar
. 2004. “Metaphern für Emotionen: Universalien oder Kulturspezifika?” In Translation in der globalen Welt und neue Wege in the Sprach- und Übersetzungsausbildung, ed. by Lew N. Zybatow, 61–91. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2008. “Impoliteness and emotional arguments.” Journal of Politeness Research 4(2): 243–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kienpointner, Manfred, and Maria Stopfner. 2017. “Ideologies of politeness.” In Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, ed. by Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 61–87. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kleineberg, Christoph. 2014. “Shitstorm-Attacken. Digitaler Orkan oder Sturm im Wasserglas.” In Social Network – Die Revolution der Kommunikation, ed. by Ullrich Dittler, and Michael Hoyer, 61–70. München: Kopaed.Google Scholar
Kleinke, Sonja, and Birte Bös. 2015. “Intergroup rudeness and the metapragmatics of its negotiation in online discussion fora.” Pragmatics 25(1): 47–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langlotz, Andreas, and Miriam A. Locher. 2017. “(Im)politeness and emotion.” In Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, ed. by Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 287–322. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Locher, Miriam A. 2015. “Interpersonal pragmatics and its link to (im)politeness research.” Journal of Pragmatics 861: 5–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mills, Sara. 2003. Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neurauter-Kessels, Manuela. 2011. “Im/polite reader responses on British online news sites.” Journal of Politeness Research 7(2): 187–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nübling, Damaris. 2014. “ Das Merkel – Das Neutrum bei weiblichen Familiennamen als derogatives Genus? “ In Linguistik der Familiennamen, ed. by Friedhelm Debus, Rita Heuser, and Damaris Nübling, 205–232. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag.Google Scholar
Page, Ruth. 2014. “Hoaxes, hacking and humour: Analysing impersonated identity on social network sites.” In The Language of Social Media, ed. by Philip Seargeant, and Caroline Tagg, 46–64. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perelman, Chaim, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1983. Traité de l’argumentation. Bruxelles: Éditions de l’Université de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Perelmutter, Renee. 2013. “ Klassika zhanra: The flamewar as a genre in the Russian bloggosphere.” Journal of Pragmatics 45(1): 74–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1984. “Jewish argument as sociability.” Language in Society 13(3): 311–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Jan-Hinrik. 2013. Social Media. Wiesbaden: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwarzhaupt-Scholz, Dorothea. 2004. Impeachment im digitalen Zeitalter. München: Fischer.Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen, and Dániel Z. Kádár. 2016. “The bases of (im)politeness evaluations: Culture, the moral order and the East-West debate.” East Asian Pragmatics 1(1): 73–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 2012. The Harm in Hate Speech. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walton, Douglas N. 1992. Slippery Slope Arguments. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Watts, Richard J. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Webster. 1993. Webster’s New Encyclopaedic Dictionary. New York: Black Dog & Leventhal.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2015. Politics of Fear. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Xie, Chaoqun. 2007. “Controversies about politeness.” In Traditions of Controversy, ed. by Marcelo Dascal, and Han-liang Chang, 249–266. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zara. 2016. Rassismus Report. Wien: Verein Zara.Google Scholar
Cited by (16)

Cited by 16 other publications

Tang, Liping
2024. Linguistic politeness in social networks. Synthese 203:6 DOI logo
van Mulken, Margot
2024. What verbal de-escalation techniques are used in complaint handling?. Journal of Pragmatics 220  pp. 116 ff. DOI logo
Xie, Chaoqun & Weina Fan
2024. Theorizing impoliteness: a Levinasian perspective. Journal of Politeness Research 20:1  pp. 157 ff. DOI logo
Androutsopoulos, Jannis
2023. Commentary: Face-work in the digital ecology. Journal of Pragmatics 204  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Ermida, Isabel
2023. Building and Analysing an Online Hate Speech Corpus: The NETLANG Experience and Beyond. In Hate Speech in Social Media,  pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Lahti, Emmi
2022. The Joint Construction of Hate Speech in Online Discussions. In Cyberhate in the Context of Migrations,  pp. 165 ff. DOI logo
Andersson, Marta
2021. The climate of climate change: Impoliteness as a hallmark of homophily in YouTube comment threads on Greta Thunberg's environmental activism. Journal of Pragmatics 178  pp. 93 ff. DOI logo
Andersson, Marta
2022. ‘So many “virologists” in this thread!’. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 32:4  pp. 489 ff. DOI logo
Andersson, Marta
2024. E-mpoliteness – creative impoliteness as an expression of digital social capital. Journal of Politeness Research 20:2  pp. 227 ff. DOI logo
Gauducheau, Nadia & Michel Marcoccia
2021. Aggressiveness on a French Discussion Forum for Youth: Analyzing the Participants’ Point of View. In Analyzing Digital Discourses,  pp. 275 ff. DOI logo
Gauducheau, Nadia & Michel Marcoccia
2023. La violence verbale dans un forum de discussion pour les 18-25 ans. Réseaux N° 241:5  pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Jiayi
2021. How and why people are impolite in danmu?. Internet Pragmatics 4:2  pp. 295 ff. DOI logo
Xie, Chaoqun
2021. Philosophizing (Im)politeness: Lived Experience, Desire and Human Nature. In The Philosophy of (Im)politeness [Advances in (Im)politeness Studies, ],  pp. 225 ff. DOI logo
Badarneh, Muhammad A.
2020. ‘Like a donkey carrying books’. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 8:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Ran, Yongping, Linsen Zhao & Dániel Z. Kádár
2020. The rite of reintegrative shaming in Chinese public dispute mediation. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 30:1  pp. 40 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. Soziolinguistische Bibliographie europäischer Länder für 2018Sociolinguistic Bibliography of European Countries for 2018Bibliographie sociolinguistique des pays européens pour 2018. Sociolinguistica 34:1  pp. 277 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.