Interaction Studies

Volume 11, Issue 2 (2010)

2010. iv, 188 pp.

Publishing status: Available
Published online on 6 July 2010

https://doi.org/10.1075/is.11.2

Table of Contents

Target article
The crying shame of robot nannies: An ethical appraisal Noel Sharkey and Amanda Sharkey	161–190
Commentaries
Time will tell – why it is too early to worry Tony Belpaeme and Anthony F. Morse	191–195
Why robot nannies probably won’t do much psychological damage Joanna J. Bryson	196–200
Socially perceptive robots: Challenges and concerns Ginevra Castellano and Christopher Peters	201–207
Dry your eyes: Examining the roles of robots for childcare applications David Feil-Seifer and Maja J. Matarić	208–213
Can you kill a robot nanny? Ethological approach to the effect of robot caregivers on child development and human evolution Enikő Kubinyi, Péter Pongrácz and Ádám Miklósi	214–219
Robot companions: Towards a new concept of friendship? Patrizia Marti	220–226
Child development robots: Social forces, children’s perspectives Gail F. Melson	227–232
Themes and variations in development: Can nanny-bots act like human caregivers? Jean Mercer	233–237
Warning: The author of this document may have no mental states. Read at your own risk Javier R. Movellan	238–245
Strange carers: Robots as attachment figures and aids to parenting Dean Petters, Everett Waters and Felix Schönbrodt	246–252
Additional elements on the use of robots for childcare Javier Ruiz-del-Solar	253–256
It takes a village to construct a robot: A socially situated perspective on the ethics of robot design Selma Šabanović	257–262
Care-receiving robot as a tool of teachers in child education Fumihide Tanaka and Takeshi Kimura	263–268
Robbie, the pioneer robot nanny: Science fiction helps develop ethical social opinion Carme Torras	269–273
Robot nannies: Future or fiction? Egon L. van den Broek	274–282
Applied ethicists: Naysayers or problem solvers? Wendell Wallach	283–289
Oversold, unregulated, and unethical: Why we need to respond to robot nannies Blay Whitby	290–294
Changing perspective: From avoiding harm to child’s best interests Carsten Zoll and Caroline Spielhagen	295–301
Authors’ response to commentaries
Robot nannies get a wheel in the door: A response to the commentaries Noel Sharkey and Amanda Sharkey	302–313
Regular articles
Towards a conceptual and methodological framework for determining robot believability Robert Rose, Matthias Scheutz and Paul Schermerhorn	314–335
The face-to-face light detection paradigm: A new methodology for investigating visuospatial attention across different face regions in live face-to-face communication settings Laura A. Thompson, Daniel M. Malloy, John M. Cone and David L. Hendrickson	336–348

Subjects

Linguistics

Cognition and language

Evolution of language