Research report
The situational context and the reliability of an adult model influence infants’ imitation
Four studies examined 15- to 16-month-olds’ imitation of a model’s novel action with a familiar or an unfamiliar
object. The infants observed a reliable or an unreliable model demonstrating a novel action with the object in a solitary
observational (Study 1, 44 infants; Study 3, 40 infants) or in an interactive (Study 2, 48 infants; Study 4, 44 infants) context.
The model’s reliability was manipulated by having the model acting competently or incompetently with different familiar objects.
In two out of four studies infants imitated the model’s behavior when the model had previously shown to be reliable than when the
model had been unreliable. The infants’ motivation to imitate was related to whether the reliable model interacted with the
infants during object demonstration. More infants imitated the reliable model, who demonstrated the objects while interacting with
the infants, than the reliable model who behaved in a disinterested manner during object demonstration.
Article outline
- The current research
- Study 1: Familiar object – no interaction
- Method
- Experimental conditions
- Demonstration phase
- Imitation phase
- Procedure
- Coding and reliability
- Manipulation checks
- Measures of infant variables
- Demonstration phase
- Imitation phase
- Results
- Discussion
- Study 2: Familiar object with interaction
- Method
- Experimental conditions
- Procedure
- Coding and reliability
- Manipulation checks
- Measures of infant variables
- Demonstration phase
- Imitation phase
- Results
- Discussion
- Study 1 vs. Study 2
- Study 3: Unfamiliar object – no interaction
- Method
- Experimental conditions
- Procedure
- Coding and reliability
- Manipulation checks
- Measures of infant variables
- Demonstration phase
- Imitation phase
- Results
- Discussion
- Study 4: Unfamiliar object with interaction
- Method
- Experimental conditions
- Procedure
- Coding and reliability
- Manipulation checks
- Measures of infant variables
- Demonstration phase
- Imitation phase
- Results
- Discussion
- Study 3 vs. Study 4
- Acknowledgements
-
References
References (25)
References
Brooker, I., & Poulin-Dubois, D. (2013). Is a bird an apple? The effect of speaker labeling accuracy on infants’ word learning, imitation, and helping behaviors. Infancy, 18(s1), E46–E68. 

Brugger, A., Lariviere, L. A., Mumme, D. L., & Bushnell, E. W. (2007). Doing the right thing: Infants’ selection of actions to imitate from observed event sequences. Child Development, 78(3), 806–824. 

Butler, L. P., & Markman, E. M. (2012). Preschoolers use intentional and pedagogical cues to guide inductive inferences and exploration. Child Development, 83(4), 1416–1428. 

Carpenter, M., Akhtar, N., & Tomasello, M. (1998). Fourteen- through 18-month-old infants differentially imitate intentional and accidental actions. Infant Behavior and Development, 21(2), 315–330. 

Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6), 893–910. 

Csibra, G., & Gergely, G. (2009). Natural pedagogy. Trends in cognitive sciences, 13(4), 148–153. 

Floor, P., & Akhtar, N. (2006). Can 18-month-old infants learn words by listening in on conversations? Infancy, 9(3), 327–339. 

Harris, P. L., & Corriveau, K. H. (2011). Young children’s selective trust in informants. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. B, 3661, 1179–1187. 

Heyes, C. M. (2013). What can imitation do for cooperation? In K. Sterelny, R. Joyce, B. Calcott & B. Fraser (Eds.), Cooperation and its evolution (pp. 313–333). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Király, I., Csibra, G., & Gergely, G. (2013). Beyond rational imitation: Learning arbitrary means actions from communicative demonstrations. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116(2), 471–486. 

Király, I. (2009). The effect of the model’s presence and of negative evidence on infants’ selective imitation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102(1), 14–25. 

Matheson, H., Moore, C., & Akhtar, N. (2013). The development of social learning in interactive and observational contexts. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114(2), 161–172. 

Meltzoff, A. N. (2007a). ‘‘Like me’’: A foundation for social cognition. Developmental Science, 10(1), 126–134. 

Meltzoff, A. N. (2007b). The “like me” framework for recognizing and becoming an intentional agent. Acta Psychologica, 124(1), 26–43. 

Moraru, C.-A., Gomez, J.-C., & McGuigan, N. (2016). Developmental changes in the influence of conventional and instrumental cues on over-imitation in 3- to 6-year-old children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1451, 34–47. 

Nielsen, M., Cucchiaro, J., & Mohamedally, J. (2012). When the transmission of culture is child’s play. PLoS One, 7(3). 

Nielsen, M. (2006). Copying actions and copying outcomes: Social learning through the second year. Developmental Psychology, 42(3), 555–565. 

Nielsen, M., Simcock, G., & Jenkins, L. (2008). The effect of social engagement on 24-month-olds’ imitation from live and televised models. Developmental Science, 11(5), 722–731. 

Poulin-Dubois, D., Brooker, I., & Polonia, A. (2011). Infants prefer to imitate a reliable person. Infant Behavior and Development, 34(2), 303–309. 

Rakoczy, H., Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2008). The sources of normativity: young children’s awareness of the normative structure of games. Developmental Psychology, 44(3), 875–881. 

Shimpi, P. M., Akhtar, N., & Moore, C. (2013). Toddlers’ imitative learning in interactive and observational contexts: the role of age and familiarity of the model. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116(2), 309–323. 

Shneidman, L., Todd, R., & Woodward, A. L. (2014). Why do directed interactions support imitative learning in young children? PLoS ONE, 9(10). 

Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Zmyj, N., Buttelmann, D., Carpenter, M., & Daum, M. M. (2010). The reliability of a model influences 14-month-olds’ imitation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 106(4), 208–220. 

Yang, D., Sidman, J., & Bushnell, E. W. (2010). Beyond the information given: Infants’ transfer of actions learned through imitation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 106(1), 62–81. 

Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.