A process-focused learning model for L2 vocabulary acquisition
Construction, implementation and validation
This study aims to identify essential stages involved in vocabulary learning by constructing, implementing and validating a process-focused learning model using structural equation modelling (SEM). In this model, successful vocabulary learning goes through four sequential stages: perceiving the word form; accessing the word meaning; mapping the word form with meaning; using the word. A vocabulary learning strategy questionnaire was developed based on the model and administered to more than 300 Chinese university students; the model was satisfactorily tested using the SEM technique. The empirical findings provide further insights into our understanding of the complex nature of vocabulary acquisition which forms a systematic learning loop. A number of learning and teaching implications were drawn accordingly to enhance L2 vocabulary acquisition and vocabulary learning strategy training programmes.
References (82)
Ahmed, M.D. (1989). Vocabulary learning strategies. In P. Meara (Ed.), British studies in applied linguistics: Vol. 4. Beyond words (pp. 3–14). London: British Association of Applied Linguistics/Centre for Language Teaching.
Atkinson, R.C., & Raugh, M.R. (1975). An application of the mnemonic keyword method to the acquisition of a Russian vocabulary. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 104(2), 126–133.
Baddeley, A. (1999). Essentials of human memory. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
Baddeley, A., Eysenck, M.W., & Anderson, M.C. (2009). Memory. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
Barcroft, J. (2004). Second language vocabulary acquisition: A lexical input processing approach. Foreign Language Annals, 37(2), 200–208.
Breivik, E., & Olsson, U.H. (2001). Adding variables to improve fit: The effect of model size on fit assessment in LISREL. In R. Cudeck, S. du Toit, & D. Sörbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future (pp. 169–194). Ann Arbor, MI: Scientific Software International.
Brown, C., & Payne, M.E. (1994, March). Five essential steps of processes in vocabulary learning. Paper presented at the TESOL convention, Baltimore, MD.
Byrne, B.M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Byrne, B.M. (2006). Structural equation modeling with EQS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Catalán, R.M.J. (2003). Sex differences in L2 vocabulary learning strategies. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 54–77.
Chamot, A.U., Barnhardt, S., El-Dinary, P.B., & Robbins, J. (1999). The learning strategies handbook. White Plains, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.
Chapelle, C. (1998). Construct definition and validity inquiry in SLA research. In L.F. Bachman & A.D. Cohen (Eds.), Interface between second language acquisition and language testing research (pp. 32–70). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chen, J.F., Warden, C.A., & Chang, H.T. (2005). Motivators that do not motivate: The case of Chinese EFL learners and the influence of culture on motivation. TESOL Quarterly, 39(4), 609–633.
Coady, J. (1993). Research on ESL/EFL vocabulary acquisition: Putting it in context. In T. Huckin, M. Haynes, & J. Coady (Eds.), Second language reading and vocabulary learning (pp. 3–23). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Cohen, A.D. (1987). The use of verbal and imagery mnemonics in second-language vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9(1), 43–61.
Cohen, A.D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. London: Longman.
Craik, F.I.M., & Lockhart, R. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 671–684.
Craik, F.I.M., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retentions of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104(3), 268–294.
Csizér, K., & Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The internal structure of language learning motivation and its relationship with language choice and learning effort. The Modern Language Journal, 89(1), 19–36.
Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J.A. (2000). Introducing LISREL. London: Sage.
Eysenck, M.W., & Keane, M.T. (2010). Cognitive psychology: A student’s handbook. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
Fan, M.Y. (2003). Frequency of use, perceived usefulness, and actual usefulness of second language vocabulary strategies: A study of Hong Kong learners. The Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 222–241.
Fan, X.T., & Sivo, S.A. (2007). Sensitivity of fit indices to model misspecification and model types. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(3), 509–529.
Field, A.P. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage.
Gan, Z., Humphreys, G., & Hamp-Lyons, L. (2004). Understanding successful and unsuccessful EFL students in Chinese universities. The Modern Language Journal, 88(2), 229–244.
Gagné, E.D., Yekovich, C.W., & Yekovich, F.R. (1993). The cognitive psychology of school learning. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
Gao, X. (2010). Strategic language learning: The roles of agency and context. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Gu, Y. (2002). Gender, academic major and vocabulary learning of Chinese EFL learners. RELC Journal, 33(1), 35–54.
Gu, Y. (2003). Fine brush and freehand: The vocabulary-learning art of two successful Chinese EFL learners. TESOL Quarterly, 37(1), 73–104.
Gu, Y., & Johnson, R.K. (1996). Vocabulary learning strategies and language learning outcomes. Language Learning, 46(4), 643–679.
Hatch, C., & Brown, E. (1995). Vocabulary, semantics, and language education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Henriksen, B. (1999). Three dimensions of vocabulary development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(2), 303–317.
Horst, M., Cobb, T., & Meara, P. (1998). Beyond a clockwork orange: Acquiring second language vocabulary through reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 11(2), 207–223.
Hu, L.T., & Bentler, P.M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453.
Hulstijn, J.H. (2001). Intentional and incidental second language vocabulary learning: A reappraisal of elaboration, rehearsal and automaticity. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 258–286). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hulstijn, J.H. (2003). Incidental and intentional learning. In C. Doughty & M.H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 349–381). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Hulstijn, J.H., Hollander, M., & Greidanus, T. (1996). Incidental vocabulary learning by advanced language students: The influence of marginal glosses, dictionary use, and reoccurrence of unknown words. The Modern Language Journal, 80(3), 327–339.
In’nami, Y., & Koizumi, R. (2011). Structural equation modeling in language testing and learning research: A review. Language Assessment Quarterly, 8(3), 250–276.
Jiang, N. (2000). Lexical representation and development in a second language. Applied Linguistics, 21(1), 47–77.
Jöreskog, K.G. (1973). A general method for estimating a linear structural equation system. In A.S. Goldberger & O.D. Duncan (Eds.), Structural equation models in the social sciences (pp. 85–112). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Kelly, P., & Li, X. (2005). A new approach to learning English vocabulary: More efficient, more effective, and more enjoyable. Beijing, China: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
Kenny, D.A., & McCoach, D.B. (2003). Effect of the number of variables on measures of fit in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 10(3), 333–351.
Kline, R.B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
Laufer, B. (2003). Vocabulary acquisition in a second language: Do learners really acquire vocabulary by reading? Some empirical evidence. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 59(4), 567–587.
Laufer, B. (2010). Form focused instruction in second language vocabulary learning. In R. Chacón-Beltrán, C. Abello-Contesse, & M.M. Torreblanca-López (Eds.), Further insights into non-native vocabulary teaching and learning (pp. 15–27). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
Laufer, B., Elder, C., Hill, K., & Congdon, P. (2004). Size and strength: Do we need both to measure vocabulary knowledge? Language Testing, 21(2), 202–226.
Laufer, B., & Hulstijn, J.H. (2001). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 1–26.
Ma, Q. (2009). Second language vocabulary acquisition. Bern: Peter Lang.
Ma, Q. (2013). Matching vocabulary learning process with learning outcome in L2 academic writing: an exploratory case study. Linguistics and Education, 24(2), 237–246.
Marsh, H.W., Hau, K.T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in over generalizing Hu & Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(3), 320–341.
Meara, P. (1996). The vocabulary knowledge framework. Vocabulary Acquisition Research Group Virtual Library. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Melka, F. (1982). Receptive versus productive vocabulary: A survey. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin, 6(2), 5–33.
Melka, F. (1997). Receptive vs. productive aspects of vocabulary. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 84–102). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nation, I.S.P. (1990). Teaching and Learning Vocabulary. New York, NY: Newbury House.
Nation, I.S.P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nation, I.S.P., & Webb, S. (2011). Researching and analyzing vocabulary. Boston, MA: Heinle.
O’Malley, J.M., & Chamot, A.U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle.
Oxford, R. (2001). Language learning styles and strategies. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second language or foreign language (pp. 359–366). Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle/Thomson Learning.
Oxford, R., & Nyikos, M. (1989). Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students. The Modern Language Journal, 73(3), 291–300.
Oxford, R., & Scarcella, R.C. (1994). Second language vocabulary learning among adults: State of the art in vocabulary instruction. System, 22(2), 231–243.
Paivio, A., & Desrochers, A. (1979). Effects of an imagery mnemonic on second language recall and comprehension. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 33(1), 17–28.
Pressley, M., & Levin, J.R. (1981). The keyword method and recall of vocabulary words from definitions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning, 17(1), 72–76.
Purpura, J.E. (1997). An analysis of the relationships between test takers’ cognitive and metacognitive strategy use and second language test performance. Language Learning, 47(2), 289–325.
Qian, D.D. (1999). Assessing the roles of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 56(2), 282–308.
Qian, D.D. (2002). Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance: An assessment perspective. Language Learning, 52(3), 513–536.
Read, J. (1993). The development of a new measure of L2 vocabulary knowledge. Language Testing, 10(3), 355–371.
Read, J. (1998). Validating a test to measure depth of vocabulary knowledge. In A. Kunnan (Ed.), Validation in language assessment (pp. 41–60). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J.C. (1976). The role of vocabulary teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 10(1), 77–89.
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158.
Schmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 199–227). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schmitt, N., Ng, J.W.C., & Garras, J. (2011). The word associates format: Validation evidence. Language Testing, 28(1), 105–126.
Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D., & Clapham, C. (2001). Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the vocabulary levels test. Language Testing, 18(1), 55–88.
Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Person Allyn & Bacon.
Tseng, W.T., & Schmitt, N. (2008). Towards a model of motivated vocabulary learning: A structural equation modeling approach. Language Learning, 58(2), 357–400.
Vermeer, A. (2001). Breadth and depth of vocabulary in relation to L1/L2 acquisition and frequency of input. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22(2), 217–234.
Walton, K.F. (2009). Secondary students’ conceptions of assessment mediated by self-motivational attitudes: Effects on academic performance. Unpublished MAs thesis, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Webb, S. (2008). The effects of context on incidental vocabulary learning. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20(2), 232–245.
Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Uchihara, Takumi
2023.
How Does the Test Modality of Weekly Quizzes Influence Learning the Spoken Forms of Second Language Vocabulary?.
TESOL Quarterly 57:2
► pp. 595 ff.
Ueno, Shotaro & Osamu Takeuchi
2023.
Relationship between second language vocabulary knowledge and vocabulary learning strategy use: a meta-analysis of correlational studies.
International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching
Uchihara, Takumi, Masaki Eguchi & Jon Clenton
2022.
The contribution of guessing from context and dictionary use to receptive and productive vocabulary knowledge: A structural equation modeling approach.
Language Teaching Research
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.