Cover not available
Article published In:
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 175:2 (2024) ► pp.163–186

Learning L2 formulaic sequences from meaning-focused activities

ORCID logo | KU Leuven | Research Foundation – Flanders (FWO)
Formulaic language is becoming an increasingly popular topic of investigation in second language acquisition research. As linguistic units that provide language users with many benefits in communication and language processing, formulaic sequences have now taken up a central role in theoretical approaches to SLA theory and L2 pedagogy. This paper provides a review of studies investigating how formulaic sequences are acquired from meaning-focused L2 activities. The article starts by defining formulaic language and discussing the advantages of formulaic sequences for SLA. It then addresses key issues in L2 processing and use of formulaic sequences, before reviewing research into L2 acquisition of formulaic sequences through meaning-focused activities. Finally, the paper identifies some future directions for research on meaning-focused L2 learning of formulaic language.
Keywords: vocabulary, formulaic language, incidental learning, meaning-focused activities
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Formulaic language and its role in SLA
  • How formulaic sequences are processed and used in a second language
  • Learning L2 formulaic sequences: The role of salience
  • Learning L2 formulaic sequences from meaning-focused activities
    • Exposure frequency
    • Attention and input enhancement
    • Input mode
    • Online measures
    • Summary of findings
  • Directions for future research
  • Conclusion
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 30 August 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.23014.pui
References (96)
References
Alotaibi, S., Pellicer-Sánchez, A., & Conklin, K. (2021). The effect of input modes and number of exposures on the learning of L2 binomials. ITL – International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 173 (1), 58–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2022). The effect of input modes and number of exposures on the learning of L2 binomials. ITL – International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 173 (1), 58–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arnon, I., & Priva, U. C. (2013). More than words: The effect of multi-word frequency and constituency on phonetic duration. Language and Speech, 56 (3), 349–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bannard, C., & Matthews, D. (2008). Stored Word Sequences in Language Learning of Four-Word Combinations. Psychological Science, 19 (3), 241–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, J., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Boers, F. (2020). Factors affecting the learning of multiword items. In S. Webb (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Vocabulary Studies (pp. 143–157). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Boers, F., Demecheleer, M., Coxhead, A., & Webb, S. (2014). Gauging the effects of exercises on verb-noun collocations. Language Teaching Research, 18 (1), 54–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boers, F., Eyckmans, J., Kappel, J., Stengers, H., & Demecheleer, M. (2006). Formulaic sequences and perceived oral proficiency: putting a Lexical Approach to the test. Language Teaching Research, 10 (3), 245–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S. (2009). Optimizing a lexical approach to instructed second language acquisition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bollansée, L., Puimège, E., & Peters, E. (2021). “Watch out! Behind you is the enemy!” An exploratory study into the relationship between extramural English and productive vocabulary knowledge. In V. Werner & F. Tegge (Eds.), Pop culture and language learning (pp. 199–214). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. (1998). The Emergent Lexicon. Chicago Linguistic Society, 341, 421–435.Google Scholar
Chen, Y. (2021). Comparing incidental vocabulary learning from reading-only and reading-while-listening. System, 20 (97). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y.-H., & Baker, P. (2010). Lexical Bundles in L1 and L2 Academic Writing. Language Learning & Technology, 14 (2), 30–49.Google Scholar
Carrol, G., & Conklin, K. (2014). Getting your wires crossed: Evidence for fast processing of L1 idioms in an L2. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17 (4), 784–797. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carrol, G., Conklin, K., & Gyllstad, H. (2016). Found in translation: The influence of the L1 on the reading of idioms in a L2. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38 1, 403–443. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carrol, G., Littlemore, J., & Dowens, M. G. (2018). Of false friends and familiar foes: Comparing native and non-native understanding of figurative phrases. Lingua, 204 1, 21–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Choi, S. (2017). Processing and learning of enhanced English collocations: An eye movement study. Language Teaching Research, 21 (3), 403, 426. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cintrón-Valentín, M. C., & Ellis, N. C. (2016). Salience in second language acquisition: Physical form, learner attention, and instructional focus. Frontiers in Psychology, 7 1: 1284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conklin, K., & Carrol, G. (2021). Words go together like “bread and butter”: The rapid, automatic acquisition of lexical patterns. Applied Linguistics, 42 (3), 492–513. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crossley, S. A., Salsbury, T., & Mcnamara, D. S. (2011). Predicting the proficiency level of language learners using lexical indices. Language Teaching, 29 (2), 243–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Wilde, V., Brysbaert, M., & Eyckmans, J. (2019). Learning English through out-of-school exposure: Which levels of language proficiency are attained and which types of input are important? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23 (1), 171–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Divjak, D. (2019). Frequency in Language. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Durrant, P., & Doherty, A. (2010). Are high-frequency collocations psychologically real? Investigating the thesis of collocational priming. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 6 (2), 125–155.
Durrant, P., & Schmitt, N. (2010). Adult learners’ retention of collocations from exposure. Second Language Research, 26 (2), 163–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
El-Dakhs, D. A. S., Sonbul, S., & Alwazzan, R. (2021). Learning phrasal verbs in the EFL classroom: the effect of prior vocabulary knowledge and opacity. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 60 (4), 1253–1291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2006). Selective attention and transfer phenomena in L2 acquisition: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics, 27 1, 164–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C., Simpson-Vlach, R., & Maynard, C. (2008). Formulaic language in native and second-language speakers. TESOL Quarterly, 42 (3), 375–396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elgort, I. (2022). Word knowledge, learning and acquisition in a second language: Proposed replications of Elgort (2011) and Qiao and Forster (2017). Language Teaching, 55 1, 260–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evert, S. (2008). Corpora and collocations. Corpus Linguistics. An International Handbook, 1–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garner, J., & Crossley, S. (2018). A latent curve model approach to studying L2 N-gram development. The Modern Language Journal, 102 (3), 494–511. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Godfroid, A. (2019). Sensitive Measures of Vocabulary Knowledge and Processing: Expanding Nation’s Framework 1. In Webb (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of vocabulary studies (pp. 433–453). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Groom, N. (2009). Effects of second language immersion on second language collocational development. In A. Barfield & H. Gyllstad (Eds.), Researching Collocations in Another Language (pp. 21–33). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gyllstad, H., & Wolter, B. (2016). Collocational Processing in Light of the Phraseological Continuum Model: Does Semantic Transparency Matter? Language Learning, 66 (2), 296–323. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoey, M. (2005). Lexical priming: A new theory of words and language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hoang, H., & Boers, F. (2016). Re-telling a story in a second language: How well do adult learners mine an input text for multiword expressions? Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6 (3), 513–535. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hsu, J. Y. (2007). Lexical collocations and their relation to the online writing of Taiwanese college English majors and non-English majors. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 4 1, 192–209.Google Scholar
Kormos, J. (2006). Speech production and second language acquisition. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kremmel, B., Brunfaut, T., & Alderson, J. C. (2017). Exploring the Role of Phraseological Knowledge in Foreign Language Reading. Applied Linguistics, 38 (6), 848–870. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuiper, K., & Haggo, D. (1984). Livestock Auctions, Oral Poetry, and Ordinary Language. Language in Society 13 (2), 205–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B., & Hulstijn, J. (2001). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvementLaufer, B. and J. Hulstijn. 2001. Applied Linguistics, 22 (1), 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B., & Waldman, T. (2011). Verb-Noun Collocations in Second Language Writing: A Corpus Analysis of Learners’ English. Language Learning, 61 (2), 647–672. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lin, P. M. S. (2012). Sound evidence : The missing piece of the jigsaw in formulaic language. Applied Linguistics, 33 (3), 342–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majuddin, E., Siyanova-Chanturia, A., & Boers, F. (2021). Incidental acquisition of multiword expressions through audiovisual materials: The role of repetition and typographic enhancement. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43 (5), 985–1008. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martinez, R., & Schmitt, N. (2012). A phrasal expressions list. Applied Linguistics, 33 (3), 299–320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montero Perez, M., Van Den Noortgate, W., & Desmet, P. (2013). Captioned video for L2 listening and vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis. System, 41 (3), 720–739. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myles, F., Hooper, J., & Mitchell, R. (1998). Rote or rule? Exploring the role of formulaic language in classroom foreign language learning. Language Learning, 48 (3), 323–363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Northbrook, J., & Conklin, K. (2019). Is What You Put in What You Get Out ? – Textbook-derived Lexical Bundle Processing in Beginner English Learners. Applied Linguistics, 40 (5), 816–833. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Northbrook, J., Conklin, K., & Allen, D. (2021). ‘Did you see that?’ – The role of repetition and enhancement on lexical bundle processing in English learning materials. Applied Linguistics, 43 (3), 453–472. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Obermeier, A., & Elgort, I. (2021). Deliberate and contextual learning of L2 idioms: The effect of learning conditions on online processing. System, 97 1.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ohlrogge, A. (2009). Formulaic expressions in intermediate EFL writing assessment. In R. Corrigan, E. A. Moravcsik, H. Ouali, & K. M. Wheatley (Eds.), Formulaic Language Volume 2: Acquisition, Loss, Psychological Reality, and Functional Explanations (pp. 375–386). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Öksüz, D., Brezina, V., & Rebuschat, P. (2020). Collocational processing in L1 and L2 : The effects of word frequency, collocational frequency, and association. Language Learning, 71 (1), 55–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pawley, A., & Syder, F. H. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In J. Richards & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and Communication (pp. 191–225). London: Longman. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paquot, M. (2019). The phraseological dimension in interlanguage complexity research. Second Language Research, 35 (1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paquot, M., & Granger, S. (2012). Formulaic language in learner corpora. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32 1, 130–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pellicer-Sánchez, A. (2017). Learning L2 collocations incidentally from reading. Language Teaching Research, 21 (3), 381–402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pellicer-Sánchez, A., & Boers, F. (2019). Teaching and learning of formulaic language. In A. Siyanova-Chanturia & A. Pellicer-Sánchez (Eds.), Understanding formulaic language: A second language acquisition perspective (pp. 153–173). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pellicer-Sánchez, A., Siyanova-Chanturia, A., & Parente, F. (2022). The effect of frequency of exposure on the processing and learning of collocations: A comparison of first and second language readers’ eye movements. Applied Psycholinguistics, 43 (3), 727–756. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peters, E., Puimège, E., & Szudarski, P. (2023). Repetition and incidental learning of multiword units: A conceptual multisite replication study of Webb, Newton, and Chang (2013). Language Learning, 73 (4), 1211–1251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peters, E., & Webb, S. (2018). Incidental vocabulary acquisition through viewing L2 television and factors that affect learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40 (3), 551–577. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Puimège, E., Montero Perez, M., & Peters, E. (2023a). Promoting L2 acquisition of multiword units through textually enhanced audiovisual input : An eye-tracking study. Second Language Research, 39 (2), 471–492. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2023b). The effects of typographic enhancement on L2 collocation processing and learning from reading: An eye-tracking study. Applied Linguistics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Puimège, E., & Peters, E. (2019a). Learners’ English Vocabulary Knowledge Prior to Formal Instruction: The Role of Learner-Related and Word-Related Variables. Language Learning, 69 (4), 943–977. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019b). Learning L2 vocabulary from audiovisual input: an exploratory study into incidental learning of single words and formulaic sequences. The Language Learning Journal, 47 (4), 424–438. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020). Learning formulaic sequences through viewing L2 television and factors that affect learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42 (3), 525–549. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pulido, M., Macis, M., & Sonbul, S. (2024, March 16–19). Exploring non-adjacency during reading of nested collocations: Evidence from eye movements. [Conference presentation]. AAAL, Houston, TX, United States.
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11 1, 129–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, N. (Ed.). (2004). Formulaic sequences: Acquisition, processing and use. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). Researching vocabulary: a vocabulary research manual. Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siyanova-Chanturia, A., & Janssen, N. (2018). Production of familiar phrases: Frequency effects in native speakers and second language learners. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44 (12), 2009–2018. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siyanova-Chanturia, A., Conklin, K., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (2011). Seeing a phrase “time and again” matters: The role of phrasal frequency in the processing of multiword sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37 (3), 776–784. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siyanova-Chanturia, A., & Pellicer-Sánchez, A. (Eds.). (2019). Understanding formulaic language: A second language acquisition perspective. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Siyanova-Chanturia, A., & Spina, S. (2020). Multi-Word Expressions in Second Language Writing: A Large-Scale Longitudinal Learner Corpus Study. Language Learning, 70 (2), 420–463. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sonbul, S., & El-Dakhs, D. (2020). Timed versus untimed recognition of L2 collocations: Does estimated proficiency modulate congruency effects? Applied Psycholinguistics, 41 (5), 1197–1222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sonbul, S., El-Dakhs, D., Conklin, K., & Carrol, G. (2022). “Bread and butter” or “butter and bread”? Nonnatives’ processing of novel lexical patterns in context. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 45 (2), 370–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sonbul, S., & Schmitt, N. (2013). Explicit and Implicit Lexical Knowledge: Acquisition of Collocations Under Different Input Conditions. Language Learning, 63 (1), 121–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stengers, H., Boers, F., Housen, A., & Eyckmans, J. (2010). Does ‘chunking’ foster chunk-uptake? In S. De Knop, F. Boers, & A. De Rycker (Eds.), Fostering language teaching efficiency through Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 99–117). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). Formulaic sequences and L2 oral proficiency: Does the type of target language influence the association? International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 49 1, 321–343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook, and B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honor of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125–144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Szudarski, P., & Carter, R. (2016). The role of input flood and input enhancement in EFL learners’ acquisition of collocations. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 26 1, 245–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toomer, M., & Elgort, I. (2019). The development of implicit and explicit knowledge of collocations : A conceptual replication and extension of Sonbul and Schmitt (2013). Language Learning, 69 (2), 405–439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Underwood, G., Schmitt, N., & Galpin, N. (2004). The eyes have it: an eye-movement study into the processing of formulaic sequences. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), Formulaic Sequences (pp. 153–173). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vidal, K. (2003). Academic Listening: A Source of Vocabulary Acquisition? Applied Linguistics, 24 (1), 56–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vilkaitė, L. (2016). Are nonadjacent collocations processed faster? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 42 (10), 1632–1642.Google Scholar
(2017). Incidental acquisition of collocations in L2 Effects of adjacency and prior vocabulary knowledge. ITL – International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 168 (2), 248–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vu, D., & Peters, E. (2020). Learning vocabulary from reading-only, reading-while-listening, and reading with textual input enhancement: Insights from Vietnamese EFL learners. RELC Journal, 53 (1), 85–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vu, D. Van, & Peters, E. (2021). Incidental learning of collocations from meaningful input: A longitudinal study into three reading modes and factors that affect learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 44 (3), 685–707. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vu, D., & Peters, E. (2023). A longitudinal study on the effect of mode of reading on incidental collocation learning and predictors of learning gains. TESOL Quarterly, 57 (1), 5–32. Google Scholar
Webb, S. (2020). Incidental Vocabulary Learning. In S. Webb (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Vocabulary Studies (pp. 225–239). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Webb, S., & Chang, A. (2022). How does mode of input affect the incidental learning of collocations? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 44 (1), 35–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Webb, S., Newton, J., & Chang, A. (2013). Incidental Learning of Collocation. Language Learning, 63 (1), 91–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolter, B., & Yamashita, J. (2018). Word frequency, collocational frequency, L1 congruency, and proficiency in L2 collocational processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40 (2), 395–416. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wood, D. (2015). Fundamentals of formulaic language: An introduction. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Wray, A. (2000). Formulaic sequences in second language teaching: Principle and practice. Applied Linguistics, 21 (4), 463–489. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wray, A., & Fitzpatrick, T. (2008). Why can’t you just leave it alone? Deviations from memorized language as a gauge of nativelike competence. In F. Meunier & S. Granger (Eds.), Phraseology in foreign language learning and teaching (pp. 123–148). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yi, W. (2018). Statistical sensitivity, cognitive aptitudes, and processing of collocations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40 1, 831–856. DOI logoGoogle Scholar