The Multiple-Choice Cloze Test as a General Language Proficiency Test
Wim Jochems | Delft University of Technology The Netherlands
This article presents axsd discusses a number of empirical findings conœroing the validity of multiple-choice cloze tests as tests of general language proficiency. Foreign students of Dutch at Delft University of Technology were given both a series of separate proficiency tests in nstemng, speaking, reading, writing and text comprehension, and a series of multiple-choice cloze tests. Scores on the multiple-choice cloze tests were found to correlate significantly with each of the proficiency tests. In addition, scores made on the multiple-choice cloze tests appeared to form a solid basis for predictions of the total scores for listening, speaking, reading and writing taken together. Finally, a close structural similarity was found to exist between curves of average scores on successive multiple-choice cloze tests and the presupposed growth of vocabulary during the language learning process. Together, these findings tend to show that multiple-choice cloze tests constitute a valid instrument for measuring general language proficiency.
References (16)
References
Campbeil, D.T. and Stanley, J.C. (1971) : Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research on teaching. In Gage N.L., editor, Handbook of Research on Teaching (171–246). Chicago : Rand McNally.
Cranney, A. Garr. (1973) : The construction of two types of cloze reading tests for college students. Journal of Reading Behavior, 51, 60–64.
Farhady, H. (1983) : The disjunctive fallacy between discrete-point and integrative tests. In Oller, J.W. (editor), Issues in Language Testing Research (311–322). Rowley, Massachusetts : Newbury House.
HiDüfotis, F.B. and Snow, B.G. (1980) : An alternative cloze testing procedure : multiple-choice format. In Oiler, J.W. and Ferions, K., editors, Research in Language Testing (129–133). Rowley, Massachusetts : Newbury House.
Jochems, W. and Montens, F. (1986) : Hoe toets je taalvaardigheid? [How to test language proficiency]. Meppel : Boom.
Jonz, J. (1976) : Improving on the basic egg : The M.C. cloze. Language Learnings 261, 255–265.
Lord, F.M. and Novick, M.R. (1968) : Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Reading, Massachusetts : Addison-Wesley.
Normally, J.C. (1967) : Psychometric Theory. New York : McGraw-Hill.
Oiler, J.W. (1979) : Language Tests at School, A Pragmatic Approach. London : Longman
Oiler, J.W. (1982) : "g", what is it? Albuquerque : paper University of New Mexico.
Oiler, J.W. (1983) : Evidence for a general language proficiency factor : an expectancy grammar. In Oller, J.W., editor, Issues in Language Testing Research (3–10). Rowley, Massachusetts: Newbury House.
Porter, D. (1976) : Modified cloze procedure : a more valid reading comprehension test. English Language Teaching Journal, 301,151–155.
Sciarone, A.G. (1979) : Woordjes leren in het vreemdetalenonderwijs [Learning words in foreign-language education]. Muiderberg : Coutinho.
Vollmer, H.J. (1983) : The structure of foreign language competence. In Hughes, A. and Porter, D., editors, Current Developments in Language Testing (3–29). London : Academic Press.
Vollmer, H.J. and Sang, F. (1983) : Competing hypotheses about second language ability : a plea for caution. In Oller, J.W., editor, Issues in Language Testing Research (29–79). Rowley, Massachusetts : Newbury House.
Wijnstra, J.M. (1977) : Het gebruik van de cloze procedure als maat voor schriftelijke taalbeheersing [Use of the cloze procedure as a measure of written language proficiency]. Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch, 61, 262–269.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
del Puerto, Francisco Gallardo & María Martínez Adrián
2014.
The Incidence of Previous Foreign Language Contact in a Lexical Availability Task: A Study of Senior Learners. In
Lexical Availability in English and Spanish as a Second Language [
Educational Linguistics, 17],
► pp. 53 ff.
Adrián, María Martínez & Francisco Gallardo del Puerto
JOCHEMS, WIM
1991.
Effects of Learning and Teaching in a Foreign Language.
European Journal of Engineering Education 16:4
► pp. 309 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.