Sara Rubinelli | Department of Health Sciences and Health Policy, University of Lucerne and SPR, Nottwil, Switzerland
Claudia Zanini | Swiss Paraplegic Research (SPF), Nottwil, Switzerland
This paper supports the need for health professionals to be trained in argumentation theory, by illustrating the challenges that they face in interacting with patients and according to the different models of consultation that patients prefer. While there is no ideal model of consultation that can be promoted universally, the ability to construct arguments in support of health professionals’ points of view, as well as the ability to engage in critical discussion with patients, translate in essential skills for reaching patients’ agreement when communication develops through the interpretative model or the informed decision model or, eventually, shared decision-making.
2023. La argumentación en la enseñanza de las ciencias médicas. EDU REVIEW. International Education and Learning Review / Revista Internacional de Educación y Aprendizaje 11:3 ► pp. 251 ff.
2015. The Effects of General Practitioners’ Use of Argumentation to Support Their Treatment Advice: Results of an Experimental Study Using Video-Vignettes. Health Communication 30:10 ► pp. 951 ff.
Labrie, Nanon H.M. & Peter J. Schulz
2015. Exploring the relationships between participatory decision-making, visit duration, and general practitioners’ provision of argumentation to support their medical advice: Results from a content analysis. Patient Education and Counseling 98:5 ► pp. 572 ff.
Labrie, Nanon H.M.
2015. The Promise and Prospects of Argumentation for Public Health Communication. Journal of Public Health Research 4:1
Zanini, Claudia, Piercarlo Sarzi-Puttini, Fabiola Atzeni, Manuela Di Franco & Sara Rubinelli
2015. Building bridges between doctors and patients: the design and pilot evaluation of a training session in argumentation for chronic pain experts. BMC Medical Education 15:1
2013. Argumentation as Rational Persuasion in Doctor-Patient Communication. Philosophy & Rhetoric 46:4 ► pp. 550 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2013. Research in Related Disciplines and Non-Anglophone Areas. In Handbook of Argumentation Theory, ► pp. 1 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2014. Research in Related Disciplines and Non-Anglophone Areas. In Handbook of Argumentation Theory, ► pp. 677 ff.
Zanini, Claudia A. & Sara Rubinelli
2012. Using Argumentation Theory to Identify the Challenges of Shared Decisionmaking when the Doctor and the Patient have a Difference of Opinion. Journal of Public Health Research 1:2
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.