Journal of Argumentation in Context

Volume 3, Issue 2 (2014)

2014. iii, 128 pp.

Publishing status: Available

© John Benjamins Publishing Company

https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.3.2

Table of Contents

Articles
“Our reading would lead to…” Corpus perspectives on pragmatic argumentation in US Supreme Court judgments Davide Mazzi	103–125
Negotiating scientific ethos in academic controversy Zohar Livnat	126–152
A functional analysis of the 2010 Australian Prime Minister debate William Benoit and Jennifer M. Benoit-Bryan	153–168
Analogical reasoning in public health Louise Cummings	169–197
Book reviews
Review of van Eemeren & Garssen (2012): Exploring Argumentative Contexts Reviewed by Eddo Rigotti	199–218
Review of Dahlman & Feteris (2013): Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross Disciplinary Perspectives Reviewed by Janice Schuetz	219–223
Review of Tomasi (2011): Teorie dell’argomentazione e processo penale. Un’analisi comparata delle principali teorie argomentative contemporanee con profili applicativi al processo penale Reviewed by Damiano Canale	224–227
Review of Canale & Tuzet (2009): The Rules of Inference. Inferentialism in Law and Philosophy Reviewed by Harm Kloosterhuis	228–230

Subjects

Main BIC Subject

HPL: Philosophy: logic

Main BISAC Subject

LAN015000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Rhetoric