This paper aims at pointing out the normative expectations constraining political editorials. We adopt an internal perspective focusing on the process of “making” an editorial: how and why is argumentation constructed and what is at stake with it from the journalistic point of view. The focus is on the making of an editorial on David’s Cameron speech about his plans for a referendum on British membership of the European Union. Taking into account the editorial conferences where the topic is discussed as well as the writing process and the verbal protocol leading to proper comments by the journalist himself on the making of the text, we analyze in detail the emergent normative expectations and the individual credos of argumentation in the editorial.
Amossy, Ruth, and Marcel Burger. 2011. « Polémiques médiatiques et journalistiques ». Semen, [Online] 311.
Angenot, Marc. 2013. Rhétorique de la confiance et de l’autorité. Montréal: Discours Social 44.
Burger, Marcel. 2015. « Vers une linguistique impliquée ». In Agir dans la diversité des langues ed. by Xavier Gradoux, Jérôme Jacquin, and Gilles Merminod, 73–86. Bruxelles: DeBoeck.
Burger, Marcel, and Daniel Perrin. 2014. « Ce que le quotidien des journalistes nous apprend sur les tensions des discours médiatiques ». In Repenser le rôle des pratiques langagières dans la constitution des espaces sociaux contemporains, ed. by Anne-Claude Berthoud and Marcel Burger, 165–193. Bruxelles: DeBoeck.
Burger, Marcel, and Laura Delaloye. 2016. «“Maybe there is a very simple debate”: how journalists frame a public discussion from the backstage?». In Investigating Journalism practices. From Media Ethnography to Media Linguistics in the Newsroom, ed. by Marcel Burger. Lausanne: Cahiers de l’ILSL 44.
Cotter, Colleen. 2010. News Talk: Investigating the Language of Journalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Croteau, David, and William Hoynes. 2001. The Business of Media: Corporate Media and the Public Interest. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge.
Firmstone, Julie. 2008. « The Editorial Production Process and Editorial Values as Influences on the Opinions of the British Press Towards EUROPE ». Journalism Practice 2 (2): 212–229.
Herman, Thierry, and Nicole Jufer. 2000. « L’éditorial : vitrine idéologique du journal ? ». Semen 131: 1–19.
Lee, Nam-Seong. 2003. Identité langagière du genre : analyse du discours éditorial. Paris: L’Harmattan.
News Text, and Talk Research Group. 2011. « Towards a Linguistics of News Production ». Journal of Pragmatics 471: 1843–1852.
Maurice, Antoine. 2000. « Le point de vue de l’usager sur les genres journalistiques. L’exemple de l’éditorial ». Etudes de Lettres 3-41: 91–100.
Micheli, Raphaël. 2010. L’émotion argumentée. L’abolition de la peine de mort dans le débat parlementaire français. Paris: Cerf.
Myers, Frank. 1999. « Political Argumentation and the Composite Audience: A Case Study ». Quarterly Journal of Speech 85 (1): 55–71.
Perelman, Chaïm, and Lucy Olbrechts-Tyteca. [1958] 1988. Traité de l’argumentation. Bruxelles: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles.
Tindale, Christopher. 2013. « The Words of other People. The Fundamental Role of Testimony ». In Rhetorical Argumentation: Verbal and Visual Rhetoric in a Media World, ed. by Van Belle Hilde and al., 41–59. Amsterdam: Leiden University Press.
2019. Good Professional Reasons for Bad Journalism Practice: Inventing Audience Contributions in a Live Tv Debate. Journalism Practice 13:10 ► pp. 1185 ff.
2017. Discours des réseaux sociaux : enjeux publics, politiques et médiatiques. In Discours des réseaux sociaux : enjeux publics, politiques et médiatiques [Culture & Communication, ], ► pp. 219 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.