Article published In:
The Role of Pragmatics in Cyclic Language Change
Edited by Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen
[Journal of Historical Pragmatics 21:2] 2020
► pp. 182207
References (50)
Sources
Brepolis: Brepolis Cross-Database Search tool, relaying the Brepolis Latin databases. Available online at: [URL]
MGH: Monumenta Germaniae Historica. Available online at: [URL]
TLFi: Trésor de la langue Française informatisé [‘Digitized Treasury of the French Language’]. Available online at: [URL]
ATILF – CNRS and Université de Lorraine.
TLIO: Tesoro della Lingua Italiana delle Origini. Available online at: [URL]
References
Adams, James N. 1976. “A Typological Approach to Latin Word Order”. Indogermanische Forschungen 811: 70–99.Google Scholar
2016. An Anthology of Informal Latin, 200 BC–AD 900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Battisti, Carlo and Giovanni Alessio. 1951. Dizionario etimologico italiano [‘Italian Etymological Dictionary’]. Firenze: G. Barbèra.Google Scholar
Borreguero Zuloaga, Margarita. 2018. “The Evolution of Temporal Adverbs into Consecutive Connectives and the Role of Discourse Tradition: The Case of It. allora and Sp. entonces ”. In Salvador Pons Bordería and Óscar Loureda Lamas (eds), Beyond Grammaticalization and Discourse Markers: New Issues in the Study of Language Change, 232–270. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brenner, Linus. 1936. Entwicklung der Funktionen der lat. Konjunktion dum [‘Development of the Functions of Lat. Conjunction dum’]. Tübingen: Laupp.Google Scholar
Brugmann, Karl. 1886–1916. Grundriss der vergleichenden Grammatik der Indogermanischen Sprachen [‘Outline of the Comparative Grammar of the Indo-European Languages’]. Strassburg: Karl J. Trübner.Google Scholar
Company Company, Concepción. 2002. “Grammaticalization and Category Weakness”. In Ilse Wischer and Gabriele Diewald (eds), Reflections on Grammaticalization, 201–215. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cortelazzo, Manlio and Paolo Zolli. 1979–1988. deli: Dizionario etimologico della lingua italiana [‘ deli: Etymological Dictionary of the Italian Language’]. Bologna: Zanichelli.Google Scholar
Cupaiuolo, Fabio. 1967. La formazione degli avverbi in latino [‘The Formation of Adverbs in Latin’]. Napoli: Libreria scientifica editrice.Google Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth and Benjamin Fagard. 2011. “ Alors between Discourse and Grammar: The Role of Syntactic Position”. Functions of Language 18 (1): 19–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Derek. 1997. Discourse and Cognition. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Fedriani, Chiara and Piera Molinelli. 2019. “Italian ma ‘but’ in Deverbal Pragmatic Markers: Forms, Functions, and Productivity of a Pragma-dyad”. Cuadernos de Filología Italiana 261: 29–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, Angela and Corinne Rossari. 1994. “De donc à dunque et quindi: les connexions par raisonnement inférentiel” [‘From to dunque and quindi: Connections by Inferential Reasoning’]. Cahiers de Linguistique Française 151: 7–49.Google Scholar
Gaertner, Jan Felix. 2007. “ Tum und tunc in der augusteischen Dichtersprache” [‘ Tum and tunc in the Augustan Poetic Language’]. Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 150 (2): 211–224.Google Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly. 2011. The Linguistic Cycle. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. Cyclical Change Continued. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ghezzi, Chiara and Piera Molinelli. 2014. “Deverbal Pragmatic Markers from Latin to Italian (Lat. quaeso and It. prego): The Cyclic Nature of Functional Developments”. In Chiara Ghezzi and Piera Molinelli (eds), Discourse and Pragmatic Markers from Latin to the Romance Languages, 61–85. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. “Politeness Markers from Latin to Italian. Periphery, Discourse Structure and Cyclicity”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17 (2): 307–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. “Connectives and Cyclicity: From the Latin Temporal Phrase illa hora to the Italian Discourse Marker allora ”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 21 (2): 209–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Godefroy, Frédéric. 1881. Dictionnaire de l’ancienne langue française et de tous ses dialectes du IXe au XVe siècle [‘Dictionary of the Ancient French Language and All Its Dialects from the 9th to the 15th Century’]. Paris: F. Vieweg.Google Scholar
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard. 1998. The Function of Discourse Particles: A Study with Special Reference to Spoken Standard French. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Maj–Britt Mosegaard. 2014. “Cyclicity in Semantic/Pragmatic Change: The Medieval Particle ja between Latin iam and Modern French déjà ”. In Chiara Ghezzi and Piera Molinelli (eds), Discourse and Pragmatic Markers from Latin to the Romance Languages, 139–165. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard. 2018. “Cyclic Phenomena in the Evolution of Pragmatic Markers. Examples from Romance”. In Salvador Pons Bordería and Óscar Loureda Lamas (eds), Beyond Grammaticalization and Discourse Markers: New Issues in the Study of Language Change, 51–77. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heberlein, Fritz. 2011. “Temporal Clauses”. In Philip Baldi and Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds), New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax. Volume 4: Complex Sentences, Grammaticalization, Typology, 235–372. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herman, József. 1963. La formation du système roman des conjonctions de subordination [‘The Formation of the Romance System of Subordinating Conjunctions’]. Berlin: Akademieverlag.Google Scholar
Hofmann, Johann Baptist and Anton Szantyr. 1965. Lateinische Grammatik [‘Latin Grammar’]. München: Beck.Google Scholar
Jeffords, Clyde Raymond. 1905. “ Dumque, dunque, dunc, donc ”: The New York Latin Leaflet VI (129): 1–2. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kühner, Raphael and Carl Stegmann. 1966. Ausführliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache [‘Detailed Grammar of the Latin Language’]. Hannover: Verlag Hahnsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Lewis, Charlton T. and Charles Short. 1958 [1891]. A New Latin Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marotta, Giovanna. 1998. “Proposte per l’interpretazione del cambiamento fonologico in area romanza nel segno della non linearità” [‘Proposals for the Interpretation of Phonological Change in the Romance Area from a Non-linear Perspective’]. In Giovanni Ruffino (ed.), Atti del XXI Congresso Internazionale di Linguistica e Filologia Romanza [‘Proceedings of the XXI International Conference of Romance Linguistics and Philology’]. Volume 11: Grammatica storica delle lingue romanze [‘Historical Grammar of Romance Languages’], 439–454. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Meyer-Lübke, Wilhelm. 1968. Romanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch [‘Romance Etymological Dictionary’]. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Migliorini, Bruno and Aldo Duro. 1958. Prontuario etimológico della lingua italiana [‘Etymological Handbook of the Italian Language’]. Torino: Paravia.Google Scholar
Nocentini, Alberto. 2010. Dizionario etimologico della lingua italiana [‘Etymological Dictionary of the Italian Language’]. Firenze: Le Monnier.Google Scholar
Pinkster, Harm. 2015. The Oxford Latin Syntax. Volume 1: The Simple Clause. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pirson, Jules. 1901. La langue des inscriptions latines de la Gaule [‘The Language of the Latin Inscriptions of Gaul’]. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Ricca, Davide. 2010. “Il sintagma avverbiale” [‘The Adverbial Phrase’]. In Lorenzo Renzi and Giampaolo Salvi (eds), Grammatica dell’italiano antico [‘Grammar of Ancient Italian’], 715–754. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Rosén, Hannah. 2009. “Coherence, Sentence Modification, and Sentence-part Modification – the Contribution of Particles”. In Philip Baldi and Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds), New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax. Volume 1: Syntax of the Sentence, 317–344. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Stone, Robert C. 2009. The Language of the Latin Text of Codex Bezae: With an Index Verborum. Eugene: Wipf and Stock.Google Scholar
Svennung, Josef. 1935. Untersuchungen zu Palladius and zur lateinischen Fach- und Volkssprache [‘Studies on Palladius and Technical and Vulgar Latin’]. Uppsala: Almqvist och Wiksell.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Richard B. Dasher. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Vaan, Michiel. 2008. Etymological Dictionary of Latin and the Other Italic Languages. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Wagner, Max Leopold. 1960. Dizionario etimologico sardo [‘Sardinian Etymological Dictionary’]. Heidelberg: C. Winter.Google Scholar
Walde, Alois and Johann Baptist Hofmann. 1982 [1822]. Lateinisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch [‘Latin Etymological Dictionary’]. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
von Wartburg, Walther. 1922–1929. Franzosisches etymologische Wörterbuch [‘French Etymological Dictionary’]. Bonn/Tübingen/Basel: Bouvier.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Ghezzi, Chiara & Piera Molinelli
2020. Connectives and cyclicity. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 21:2  pp. 208 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.