Article published In:
Historical Pragmatics today: Articles in honour of Andreas H. Jucker
Edited by Irma Taavitsainen and Jonathan Culpeper
[Journal of Historical Pragmatics 22:2] 2021
► pp. 202224
References (47)
References
Aijmer, Karin. 2014 [1996]. Conversational Routines in English: Convention and Creativity. (Second edition.) London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Archer, Dawn and Jonathan Culpeper. 2003. “Sociopragmatic Annotation: New Directions and Possibilities in Historical Corpus Linguistics”. In Andrew Wilson, Paul Rayson and Tony McEnery (eds), Corpus Linguistics by the Lune: A Festschrift for Geoffrey Leech, 37–58. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H. 2008. Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House and Gabriele Kasper (eds). 1989. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Bryson, Anna. 1998. From Courtesy to Civility: Changing Codes of Conduct in Early Modern England. Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan and Vittorio Tantucci. 2021. “The Principle of (Im)politeness Reciprocity”. Journal of Pragmatics 1751: 146–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, Andrew Hardie, Jane Demmen, Jennifer Hughes and Matt Timperley. 2021. “Supporting the Corpus-based Study of Shakespeare’s Language: Enhancing a Corpus of the First Folio”. ICAME Journal 45 (12): 37–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eelen, Gino. 2001. A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester, UK: St. Jerome Publishing.Google Scholar
El-Mahallawi, Basma Mahmoud Mohamed. 2018. “The Use of Thanking Expressions and their Intensifiers from Early Modern to Present Day English.” FJHJ (Journal of Arts and Humanities, Minia University) 86 (4): 903–920. [URL]
Fraser, Bruce and William Nolan. 1981. “The Association of Deference with Linguistic Form”. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 271: 93–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold. 1964. “Studies of the Routine Grounds of Everyday Activities”. Social Problems 11 (3): 225–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gouldner, Alvin W. 1960. “The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement”. American Sociological Review 25 (2): 161–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guazzo, Stefano. 1581. The ciuile conuersation of M. Steeuen Guazzo written first in Italian, and nowe translated out of French by George Pettie, deuided into foure books […]. London: Richard Watkins.Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael. 2007. “The Co-constitution of Politeness Implicature in Conversation”. Journal of Pragmatics 39 (1): 84–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Im/politeness Implicatures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Jacobsson, Mattias. 2002. “ Thank You and Thanks in Early Modern English”. ICAME Journal 261: 63–80.Google Scholar
Jautz, Sabine. 2013. Thanking Formulae in English: Explorations across Varieties and Genres. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Mark. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Reason and Imagination. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. 2012. “‘What’s in a Name?’: Names and Terms of Address in Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet”. In Sarah Chevalier and Thomas Honegger (eds), Words, Words, Words: Philology and Beyond: Festschrift for Andreas Fischer on the Occasion of his 65th Birthday, 77–97. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto.Google Scholar
(ed.). 1995. Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020. Politeness in the History of English: From the Middle Ages to the Present Day. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z. 2017. Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. “Some Principles of Linguistic Methodology”. Language in Society 1 (1): 97–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2014. The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muldrew, Craig. 1998. The Economy of Obligation: The Culture of Credit and Social Relations in Early Modern England. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nuzzo, Regina. 2014. “Scientific Method: Statistical Errors”. Nature News 506 (7487): 150–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ohashi, Jun. 2008. “Linguistic Rituals for Thanking in Japanese: Balancing Obligations”. Journal of Pragmatics 40 (12): 2150–2174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oliver, Samuel J. 2022. “A Corpus-based Approach to (Im)politeness Metalanguage: A Case Study on Shakespeare’s Plays”. Journal of Pragmatics 1991: 6–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parvaresh, Vahid and Tahmineh Tayebi. 2018. “Impoliteness, Aggression and the Moral Order”. Journal of Pragmatics 1321: 91–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richards, Jennifer. 2003. Rhetoric and Courtliness in Early Modern Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen D. M. 2005. “(Im)Politeness, Face and Perceptions of Rapport: Unpackaging their Bases and Interrelationships”. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 1 (1): 95–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen and Wenying Jiang. 2003. “Explaining Cross-cultural Pragmatic Findings: Moving from Politeness Maxims to Sociopragmatic Interactional Principles (SIPs)”. Journal of Pragmatics 35 (10–11): 1633–1650. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma and Andreas H. Jucker. 2020. “Digital Pragmatics in English”. In Svenja Adolphs and Dawn Knight (eds), Routledge Handbook of English Language and Digital Humanities, 107–124. Abingdon, Oxon.: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tantucci, Vittorio, Jonathan Culpeper and Matteo Cristofaro. 2018. “Dynamic Resonance and Social Reciprocity in Language Change: The Case of Good Morrow ”. Language Sciences 681: 6–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Terkourafi, M. 2005. “Beyond the Micro-Level in Politeness Research”. Journal of Politeness Research 1 (2): 237–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thirsk, Joan. 1978. Economic Policy and Projects: The Development of a Consumer Culture in Early Modern England. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Keith. 2018. In Pursuit of Civility: Manners and Civilization in Early Modern England. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2017. “‘Insubordination’ in the Light of the Uniformitarian Principle”. English Language & Linguistics 21 (2): 289–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard J. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Werkhofer, Konrad T. 2005 [1992]. “Traditional and Modern Views: The Social Constitution and the Power of Politeness”. In Richard J. Watts, S. Ide and K. Ehlich (eds), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, 155–199. (Second edition.) Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Winters, Margaret E. 2010. “Introduction: On the Emergence of Diachronic Cognitive Linguistics”. In Margaret E. Winters, Heli Tissari and Kathryn Allan (eds), Historical Cognitive Linguistics, 3–27. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
02.04.18 (n.) Gratitude. 2021. In The Historical Thesaurus of English. (Second edition, Version 5.0.) University of Glasgow. Accessed 19 September 2021 at: [URL]
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Hartmann, Stefan, Nils Hansson & Adrian Loerbroks
2024. The language of gratitude: An empirical analysis of acknowledgments in German medical dissertations. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 12:1  pp. 203 ff. DOI logo
Oliveira, Ana Larissa Adorno Marciotto & Gustavo Ximenes Cunha
2024. RELAÇÕES EPISTÊMICAS E IMPOLIDEZ LINGUÍSTICA EM COMENTÁRIOS DO TWITTER/X SOBRE UM DEBATE PRESIDENCIAL. Linguagem em (Dis)curso 24 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.