Introduction published In:
Corpus-Pragmatic Studies of Democratization in Public Discourses: New perspectives, methods and materials
Edited by Turo Hiltunen, Turo Vartiainen and Jenni Räikkönen
[Journal of Historical Pragmatics 25:2] 2024
► pp. 177192
References (45)
References
Biber, Douglas, and Edward Finegan. 1989. “Drift and the Evolution of English Style: A History of Three Genres.” Language 65 (3): 487–517. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, and Bethany Gray. 2012. “The Competing Demands of Popularization vs. Economy. Written Language in the Age of Mass Literacy.” In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, ed. by Terttu Nevalainen, and Elizabeth C. Traugott, 314–328. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. “Being Specific about Historical Change: The Influence of Sub-register.” Journal of English Linguistics 41 (2): 104–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Jack Grieve, and Gina Iberri-Shea. 2009. “Noun Phrase Modification”. In One Language, Two Grammars, ed. by Günter Rohdenburg, and Julia Schlüter, 182–193. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall. 2010. “Locating Identity in Language.” In Language and Identities, ed. by Carmen Llamas, and Dominic Watt, 18–28. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coppedge, Michael. 2012. Democratization and Research Methods. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Creese, Angela, and Adrian Blackledge (eds). 2018. The Routledge Handbook of Language and Superdiversity: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. 1st ed. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, and Minna Nevala. 2012. “Sociocultural Processes and the History of English.” In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, ed. by Terttu Nevalainen, and Elizabeth C. Traugott, 365–391. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2008–. The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 560 million words, 1990–present. [URL]
De Cillia, Rudolf, Martin Reisigl, and Ruth Wodak. 1999. “The Discursive Construction of National Identities.” Discourse & Society 10 (2): 149–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
. 1995. “Technologisation of Discourse.” In Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Carmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard, and Malcolm Coulthard. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman, and Anna Mauranen. 1997. “The Conversationalisation of Political Discourse: A Comparative View.” Belgian Journal of Linguistics 11 (1): 89–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fanego, Teresa, and Paula Rodríguez-Puente (eds). 2019. Corpus-Based Research on Variation in English Legal Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Farrelly, Michael, and Elena Seoane. 2012. “Democratisation.” In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, ed. by Terttu Nevalainen, and Elizabeth C. Traugott, 392–401. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gonçalves, Bruno, Lucía Loureiro-Porto, José J. Ramasco, and David Sánchez. 2018. “Mapping the Americanization of English in Space and Time.” PLOS ONE 13 (5). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenfield, Patricia M. 2013. “The Changing Psychology of Culture from 1800 through 2000.” Psychological Science 24 (9): 1722–1731. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grugel, Jean. 2001. Democratisation: A Critical Introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Heller, Monica. 2010. “The Commodification of Language.” Annual Review of Anthropology 391: 101–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, Martin. 2020. “The Great Temptation. What Diachronic Corpora Do and Do Not Reveal about Social Change.” In Corpora and the Changing Society. Studies in the Evolution of English, ed. by Paula Rautionaho, Arja Nurmi, and Juhani Klemola, 3–27. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hiltunen, Turo. 2021. “Exploring Sub-register Variation in Victorian Newspapers: Evidence from the British Library Newspapers Database.” In Corpus-based Approaches to Register Variation, ed. by Elena Seoane, and Douglas Biber, 313–338. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hiltunen, Turo, and Lucía Loureiro-Porto. 2020. “Democratisation of Englishes: Synchronic and Diachronic Approaches.” Language Sciences 791. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hiltunen, Turo, Jenni Räikkönen, and Jukka Tyrkkö. 2020. “Investigating Colloquialization in the British Parliamentary Record in the Late 19th and Early 20th Century.” Language Sciences 791. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hiltunen, Turo, and Irma Taavitsainen (eds.) 2022. Corpus pragmatic studies on the history of medical discourse. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holly, Werner. 2008. “Tabloidisation of Political Communication in the Public Sphere.” In Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Veronika Koller, 317–342. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne, and Christian Mair. 1999. “‘Agile’ and ‘Uptight’ Genres: The Corpus-Based Approach to Language Change in Progress.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 4 (2): 221–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman, Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Landert, Daniela, Daria Dayter, Thomas C. Messerli, and Miriam A. Locher. 2023. Corpus Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Marianne Hundt, Christian Mair, and Nicholas Smith. 2009. Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loureiro-Porto, Lucía, and Turo Hiltunen. 2020. “Democratisation and Gender-neutrality in English(es).” Journal of English Linguistics 48 (3): 215–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mair, Christian. 2006. Twentieth-Century English: History, Variation and Standardization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mair, Christian, and Geoffrey Leech. 2006. “Current change in English syntax.” In The Handbook of English Linguistics, ed. by Bas Aarts, and April McMahon, 318–342. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myhill, John. 1995. “Change and Continuity in the Functions of the American English modals.” Linguistics 33 (2): 157–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pons Bordería, Salvador. 2014. “El siglo xx como diacronía: intuición y comprobación en el caso de o sea [The 20th century as a diachrony: Intuition and case of o sea ].” Rilce. Revista de Filología Hispánica 30 (3): 985–1016. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Romero-Trillo, Jesús. 2017. “Corpus Pragmatics.” Corpus Pragmatics 1 (1): 1–2. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rühlemann, Christoph, and Karin Aijmer. 2015. “Corpus Pragmatics: Laying the Foundations.” In Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, ed. by Karin Aijmer, and Christoph Rühlemann, 1–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rühlemann, Christoph, and Martin Hilpert. 2017. “Colloquialization in Journalistic Writing: The Case of Inserts with a Focus on Well .” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 18 (1): 104–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schützler, Ole. 2020. “Frequency Changes and Stylistic Levelling of Though in Diachronic and Synchronic Varieties of English – Linguistic Democratisation?Language Sciences 791. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skärlund, Sanna. 2018. “Den intima ledaren? Om ledarartiklar, informalisering och språklig förändring [The intimate editorial? On editorial articles, informalisation, and linguistic change].” Språk & Stil 281: 78–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smitterberg, Erik. 2021. Syntactic Change in Late Modern English: Studies on Colloquialization and Densification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, Andreas H. Jucker, and Jukka Tuominen (eds). 2014. Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo. 2008. Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verschueren, Jef. 2013. “Continental European Perspective View.” In The Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Yan Huang. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wray, Alison, and Michael R. Perkins. 2000. “The functions of formulaic language: An integrated model.” Language & Communication 20 (1): 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar