Cover not available
Article published In:
Corpus-Pragmatic Studies of Democratization in Public Discourses: New perspectives, methods and materials
Edited by Turo Hiltunen, Turo Vartiainen and Jenni Räikkönen
[Journal of Historical Pragmatics 25:2] 2024
► pp. 245–273

A corpus-pragmatic analysis of linguistic democratisation in the British Hansard

Comparing the two Houses

ORCID logo | University of Helsinki
ORCID logo | University of Helsinki
In this article, we investigate changes in British parliamentary discourse by using the Hansard Corpus (1803–2005). Our first goal is to determine whether parliamentary speeches have become colloquialised by studying frequency changes of select features associated with informal spoken language. Second, by analysing data from the House of Commons and the House of Lords separately, we show that the texts from the two Houses should be considered distinct sub-registers, each with their own conventions and development paths. Finally, we analyse a pattern that seems particularly relevant to parliamentary debates: one where speakers imply disagreement by referring to their peers in the third person, thus circumventing a parliamentary regulation whereby speakers are prohibited from addressing one another directly. Our findings support the idea of an ongoing colloquialisation/democratisation trend affecting parliamentary discourse while also suggesting that this process is not entirely transparent in the written record because of editorial interference.
Keywords: parliamentary discourse, colloquialisation, sub-register, House of Commons, House of Lords
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Democratisation, colloquialisation, and related processes
  • 3.Features in focus
    • 3.1Private verbs
    • 3.2Progressives
    • 3.3 That-deletion
  • 4.Material and methods
    • 4.1Hansard corpus
    • 4.2Data retrieval and analysis
  • 5.Results
    • 5.1Private verbs
    • 5.2Progressive verb phrases
    • 5.3Complement clauses and that-deletion
    • 5.4The pragmatics of coreferential complement clauses
  • 6.Discussion
  • Notes
  • References
  • Corpora, primary sources and text collections
Published online: 9 August 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00075.hil
References (63)
References
Aijmer, Karin. 1997. “ I think – an English Modal Particle?” In Modality in Germanic Languages. Historical and Comparative Perspectives, ed. by Toril Swan, and Olaf Jansen Westvik, 1–47. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Marc. 2023. “Speech in the British Hansard.” In Exploring Language and Society with Big Data: Parliamentary Discourse across Time and Space, ed. by Minna Korhonen, Haidee Kotze, and Jukka Tyrkkö, 17–53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Marc, and Andrew Struan. 2022. “In Barbarous Times and in Uncivilized Countries: Two Centuries of the Evolving Uncivil in the Hansard Corpus.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 27 (4): 480–505. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Archer, Dawn. 2018. “Negotiating Difference in Political Contexts: An Exploration of Hansard.” Language Sciences 681: 22–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, and Susan Conrad. 2009. Register, Genre, and Style. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, and Bethany Gray. 2012. “The Competing Demands of Popularization vs. Economy. Written Language in the Age of Mass Literacy.” In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, ed. by Terttu Nevalainen, and Elizabeth C. Traugott, 314–328. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. “Being Specific about Historical Change: The Influence of Sub-register.” Journal of English Linguistics 41 (2): 104–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, and Edward Finegan. 1989. “Drift and the Evolution of English Style: A History of Three Genres.” Language 65 (3): 487–517. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. “Diachronic Relations among Speech-based and Written Registers in English.” In To Explain the Present: Studies in the Changing English Language in Honour of Matti Rissanen, ed. by Terttu Nevalainen, and Leena Kahlas-Tarkka, 253–275. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1972. That’s That. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bryant, Margaret M. (ed). 1962. Current American Usage. New York: Funk & Wagnalls.Google Scholar
Denis, Derek. 2022. “Reflexes of Abruptness in the Development of Pragmatic Markers.” In Discourse-pragmatic Variation and Change: Theory, Innovations, Contact, ed. by Elizabeth Peterson, Turo Hiltunen, and Joseph Kern, 15–39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dor, Daniel. 2005. “Toward a Semantic Account of That-Deletion in English.” Linguistics 43 (2): 345–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Factsheet G7 = Some Traditions and Customs of the House. 2010. House of Commons Information Office. [URL]
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Farrelly, Michael, and Elena Seoane. 2012. “Democratization.” In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, ed. by Terttu Nevalainen, and Elizabeth C. Traugott, 392–401. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Charles A. 1994. “Dialect, Register, and Genre: Working Assumptions about Conventionalization.” In Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register, ed. by Douglas Biber, and Edward Finegan, 5–30. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita. 2014. “ I Think, I Mean and I Believe in Political Discourse: Collocates, Functions and Distribution.” Functions of Language 21 (1): 67–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grugel, Jean. 2001. Democratization: A Critical Introduction. Palgrave: Basingstoke.Google Scholar
Hiltunen, Turo. 2021. “Exploring Sub-register Variation in Victorian Newspapers: Evidence from the British Library Newspapers Database.” In Corpus-based Approaches to Register Variation, ed. by. Elena Seoane, and Douglas Biber, 313–338. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2023. “‘The Job Requires Considerable Expertise’. Tracking Experts and Expert Knowledge in the British Parliamentary Record (1800–2005).” In Exploring Language and Society with Big Data: Parliamentary discourse across time and space, ed. by Minna Korhonen, Haidee Kotze, and Jukka Tyrkkö, 227–249. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hiltunen, Turo, and Lucía Loureiro-Porto. 2020. “Democratization of Englishes: Synchronic and Diachronic Approaches.” Language Sciences 791. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hiltunen, Turo, Jenni Räikkönen, and Jukka Tyrkkö. 2020. “Investigating Colloquialization in the British Parliamentary Record in the Late 19th and Early 20th Century.” Language Sciences 79 1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hou, Liwen, and David A. Smith. 2018. “Modeling the Decline in English Passivization.” In Proceedings of the Society for Computation in Linguistics (SCiL), ed. by Gaja Jarosz, Brendan O’Connor, and Joe Pater, 34–43. Salt Lake City, Utah, January 4–7, 2018.Google Scholar
Hundt, Marianne. 2004. “Animacy, Agentivity, and the Spread of the Progressive in Modern English.” English Language and Linguistics 8 (1): 47–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne, and Christian Mair. 1999. “‘Agile’ and ‘Uptight’ Genres: The Corpus-based Approach to Language Change in Progress.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 4(2): 221–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia. 2015. “Parliamentary Discourse.” In The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, ed. by Karen Tracy, Todd L. Sandel, and Cornelia Ilie. Chichester and Malden: Wiley Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jordan, H. D. 1931. “The Reports of Parliamentary Debates, 1803–1908.” Economica 341: 437–449. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther. 2006. “‘… That is the Question’: Complementizer Omission in Extraposed that-clauses.” English Language and Linguistics 10 (1): 371–396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kirk, John M. 2015. “The Progressive in Irish English: Looking Both Ways?” In Grammatical Change in English World-Wide, ed. by Peter Collins, 85–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kranich, Svenja. 2010. The Progressive in Modern English: A Corpus-based Study of Grammaticalization and Related Changes. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Marianne Hundt, Christian Mair, and Nicholas Smith. 2009. Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, and Nicholas Smith. 2009. “Chance and Constancy in Linguistic Change: How Grammatical Usage in Written English Evolved in the Period 1931–1991.” In Corpus Linguistics: Refinements and Reassessments, ed. by Antoinette Renouf, and Andrew Kehoe, 173–200. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loureiro-Porto, Lucía, and Turo Hiltunen. 2020. “Democratization and Gender-neutrality in English(es).” Journal of English Linguistics 48 (3): 215–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mair, Christian. 1997. “Parallel Corpora: A Real-time Approach to the Study of Language Change in Progress.” In Corpus-based Studies in English, ed. by Magnus Ljung, 195–209. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. “Recent Advances in the Corpus-based Study of Ongoing Grammatical Change in English.” Text & Talk 41 (5–6): 763–785. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mair, Christian, and Marianne Hundt. 1995. “Why Is the Progressive Becoming More Frequent in English? A Corpus-based Investigation of Language Change in Progress.” Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 43 (2): 111–122.Google Scholar
McDavid, Virginia. 1964. “The Alternation of that and Zero in Noun Clauses.” American Speech 39 (2): 102–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mollin, Sandra. 2007. “The Hansard Hazard: Gauging the Accuracy of British Parliamentary Transcripts.” Corpora 2(2): 187–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Osnabrügge, Moritz, Sara B. Hobolt, and Toni Rodon. 2021. “Playing to the Gallery: Emotive Rhetoric in Parliaments.” American Political Science Review 115 (3): 885–899. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paterson, Laura L. 2014. British Pronoun Use, Prescription, and Processing Linguistic and Social Influences Affecting ‘They’ and ‘He’. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rautionaho, Paula, and Robert Fuchs. 2020. “Recent Change in Stative Progressives: A Collostructional Investigation of British English in 1994 and 2014.” English Language & Linguistics 25 (2): 35–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rühlemann, Christoph, and Karin Aijmer. 2015. “Corpus Pragmatics: Laying the Foundations.” In Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, ed. by Karin Aijmer, and Christoph Rühlemann, 1–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schützler, Ole. 2020. “Frequency Changes and Stylistic Levelling of though in Diachronic and Synchronic Varieties of English – Linguistic Democratisation?” Language Sciences 791. 101266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seoane, Elena, and Lucía Loureiro-Porto. 2005. “On the Colloquialization of Scientific British and American English.” ESP Across Cultures 21: 106–118.Google Scholar
Siemund, Rainer. 1995. “‘For Who the Bell Tolls’ – or Why Corpus Linguistics should Carry the Bell in the Study of Language Change in Present-day English.” Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 20 (2): 351–77. [URL]
Smith, Nicholas. 2020. “Conversationalization and Democratization in a Radio Chat Show: A Grammar-Led Investigation.” Language Sciences 791. 101269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Nicholas, and Paul Rayson. 2007. “Recent Change and Variation in the British English Use of the Progressive Passive.” ICAME Journal 311: 129–160.Google Scholar
Smitterberg, Erik. 2005. The Progressive in 19th-century English: A Process of Integration. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “The Progressive and Phrasal Verbs. Evidence of Colloquialization in Nineteenth-century English?” In Dynamics of Linguistic Variation: Corpus Evidence on English Past and Present, ed. by Terttu Nevalainen, Irma Taavitsainen, Päivi Pahta, and Minna Korhonen, 269–289. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
. 2021. Syntactic Change in Late Modern English: Studies on Colloquialization and Densification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spirling, Arthur. 2016. “Democratization and Linguistic Complexity: The Effect of Franchise Extension on Parliamentary Discourse, 1832–1915.” Journal of Politics 78 (1): 120–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Storms, Godfrid. 1966. “ That-clauses in Modern English.” English Studies 471: 249–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A., and Anthony Mulac. 1991. “A Quantitative Perspective on the Grammaticalization of Epistemic Parentheticals in English.” In Approaches to Grammaticalization, ed. by Elizabeth C. Traugott, and Bernd Heine, 313–348. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Uberoi, Elise, Matthew Burton, Shadi Danechi, and Paul Bolton. 2022. “Women in Politics and Public Life.” Commons Library Research Briefing, 6 October 2022. London: House of Commons Library.Google Scholar
Underhill, Robert. 1988. The Discourse Conditions for That-deletion. San Diego State University.Google Scholar
Van Bogaert, Julie. 2010. “A Constructional Taxonomy of I think and Related Expressions: Accounting for the Variability of Complement-taking Mental Predicates.” English Language and Linguistics 14 (3): 399–427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vartiainen, Turo, and Minna Palander-Collin. 2023. “From Masters and Servants to Employers and Employees: Exploring Democratisation with Big Data.” In Exploring Language and Society with Big Data: Parliamentary Discourse across Time and Space, ed. by Minna Korhonen, Haidee Kotze, and Jukka Tyrkkö, 166–193. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corpora, primary sources and text collections
Alexander, Marc, and Mark Davies. 2015–. Hansard Corpus 1803–2005. Available online at [URL]
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Säily, Tanja, Turo Vartiainen, Harri Siirtola & Terttu Nevalainen
2024. Changing styles of letter-writing?. In Unlocking the History of English [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 364], ► pp. 154 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.