Cover not available
Article published In:
Corpus-Pragmatic Studies of Democratization in Public Discourses: New perspectives, methods and materials
Edited by Turo Hiltunen, Turo Vartiainen and Jenni Räikkönen
[Journal of Historical Pragmatics 25:2] 2024
► pp. 302–328

Women’s voices in the public sphere

Processes of (discursive) democratisation in London suffrage newspapers

 | University of Duisburg-Essen
As alternative media, suffrage periodicals played an important role in women’s fight for universal suffrage, which marked a milestone on the road to democracy. Opening up a space for women in public discourse, these papers shaped and were shaped by processes of democratisation. This study explores how they balanced informative, propagandistic and commercial functions, and how women positioned themselves and others as social actors in the context of the movement, challenging gender ideologies. In line with Rühlemann and Aijmer’s (2015) notion of corpus pragmatics, the study combines the assets of corpus-linguistic methods, e.g., by drawing on keywords as pointers to relevant areas of interest, with a pronounced qualitative perspective, complementing the search results by features demanding manual analysis and discussing the findings in their socio-historical context.
Keywords: suffrage press, discourse-historical approach, gender roles, person references, involvement
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Democratisation in the context of this study
    • 2.1A socio-cultural/political perspective on democratisation and the suffrage movement
    • 2.2A linguistic perspective on democratisation
  • 3.Data and methods
    • 3.1Contextualisation of the data
    • 3.2Composition of the sample corpus and approach
  • 4.Facets of democratisation in suffrage newspapers
    • 4.1Democratisation, propaganda and commercialisation
    • 4.2Women as social actors in the democratisation process
      • 4.2.1General references to women (and men)
      • 4.2.2Roles of social actors
      • 4.2.3Two opposing camps? Suffragettes and suffragists
      • 4.2.4Activities of social actors
  • 5.Immediacy and distance
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
  • Corpora, primary sources and text collections
Published online: 9 August 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00077.bos
References (61)
References
Anthony, Laurence. 2020. AntConc (Version 3.5.9) [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University. Available from [URL]
Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid KhosraviNik, Michał Krzyżanowski, Tony McEnery, and Ruth Wodak. 2008. “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse & Society 19 (3): 273–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Joel. 2018. “The British Suffrage Movement and the Ancient Constitution, 1867–1909.” Historical Research 91 (253): 505–527. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beniger, James R. 1987. “Personalization of Mass Media and the Growth of Pseudo Community.” Communication Research 14 (3): 352–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, and Edward Finegan. 1997. “Diachronic Relations among Speech-based and Written Registers in English.” In To Explain the Present. Studies in the Changing English Language in Honour of Matti Rissanen, ed. by Terttu Nevalainen, and Leena Kahlas-Tarkka, 253–275. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Bös, Birte. 2015. “From 1760 to 1960: Diversification and Popularization.” In News as Changing Texts – Corpora, Methodologies and Analysis. 2nd ed., ed. by Roberta Facchinetti, Nicholas Brownlees, Birte Bös, and Udo Fries, 91–143. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
. 2021. “Contextualising British Suffrage Newspapers”. In The Role of Context in the Production and Reception of Historical News Discourse, ed. by Nicholas Brownlees, 155–177, Frankfurt/M.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall. 2005. “Identity and Interaction: A Sociocultural Linguistic Approach.” Discourse Studies 7 (4–5): 584–614. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carstens, Lisa. 2011. “Unbecoming Women: Sex Reversal in the Scientific Discourse on Female Deviance in Britain, 1880–1920.” Journal of the History of Sexuality 20 (1): 62–94. [URL]
Coppedge, Michael. 2012. Democratization and Research Methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crawford, Elizabeth. 1999. The Women’s Suffrage Movement: A Reference Guide 1866–1928. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2009. “Keyness: Words, Parts-of-speech and Semantic Categories in the Character-talk of Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet .” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14 (1): 29–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Fina, Anna. 2010. “The Negotiation of Identities”. In Interpersonal Pragmatics, HoPs 6. ed. by Miriam A. Locher, and Sage L. Graham, 205–224. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DiCenzo, Maria. 2011. “Unity and Dissent: Official Organs of the Suffrage Campaign.” In Feminist Media History. Suffrage, Periodicals and the Public Sphere, ed. by Maria DiCenzo, Lucy Delap, and Leila Ryan, 76–119. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DiCenzo, Maria, Lucy Delap, and Leila Ryan. 2011. Feminist Media History. Suffrage, Periodicals and the Public Sphere. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dossena, Marina. 2019. “The Prince and the Sassenach. Constructing Group Homogeneity through Labels (and Anachronisms) in Late Modern Times and Beyond.” In Reference and Identity in Public Discourses, ed. by Ursula Lutzky, and Minna Nevala, 43–65. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
. 1994. “Conversationalization of Public Discourse and the Authority of the Consumer.” In The Authority of the Consumer, ed. by Russell Keat, Nigel Whiteley, and Nicholas Abercrombie, 253–268. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2001. Language and Power. 2nd ed. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Farrelly, Michael, and Elena Seoane. 2012. “Democratization.” In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, ed. by Terttu Nevalainen, and Elizabeth C. Traugott, 392–401. Oxford University Press, Oxford. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garrard, John. 2002. Democratisation in Britain. Elites, Civil Society, and Reform since 1800. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gupta, Katherine E. 2013. A Corpus Linguistic Investigation into the Media Representation of the Suffrage Movement. Nottingham: PhD thesis, University of Nottingham.
Hiltunen, Turo. 2021. “Exploring Sub-register Variation in Victorian Newspapers: Evidence from the British Library Newspapers Database”. In Corpus-based Approaches to Register Variation, ed. by Elena Seoane, and Douglas Biber, 313–338. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hiltunen, Turo, and Lucía Loureiro-Porto. 2020. “Democratization of Englishes: Synchronic and Diachronic Approaches.” Language Sciences 791: 1–8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne, and Christian Mair. 1999. ““Agile” and “Uptight” Genres: The Corpus-based Approach to Language Change in Progress.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 4 (2): 221–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jary, Mark, and Mikhail Kissine. 2014. Imperatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jia, Sen, Thomas Lansdall-Welfare, Saatviga Sudhahar, Cynthia Carter, and Nello Cristianini. 2016. “Women Are Seen More than Heard in Online Newspapers.” PLoS ONE 11 (2): 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. 2012. “Changes in Politeness Culture.” In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, ed. by Elizabeth Closs Traugott, and Terttu Nevalainen, 422–433. Oxford University Press, Oxford. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H., and Irma Taavitsainen. 2012. “Pragmatic Variables.” In The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics, ed. by. Juan M. Hernández-Campoy, and J. Camilo Conde-Silvestre, 293–306. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kent, Susan Kingsley. 1987. Sex and Suffrage in Britain, 1860–1914. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kiełkiewicz-Janowiak, Agnieszka. 2012. “Class, Age, and Gender-based Patterns.” In: Juan M. Hernández-Campoy and J. Camilo Conde-Silvestre (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics, 307–331. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kleinke, Sonja, Nuria Hernández, and Birte Bös. 2018. “Introduction: Identity Construction in Complex Discourse Contexts.” In The Discursive Construction of Identities On- and Offline: Personal – Group – Collective, ed. by Birte Bös, Sonja Kleinke, Sandra Mollin, and Nuria Hernández, 1–12. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koch, Peter, and Wulf Oesterreicher. 1985. “Sprache der Nähe – Sprache der Distanz. Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit im Spannungsfeld von Sprachtheorie und Sprachgeschichte [‘Language of Immediacy – Language of Distance: Orality and Literacy from the Perspective of Language Theory and Linguistic History’].” In Romanistisches Jahrbuch 361, 15–43. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landert, Daniela. 2014. Personalisation in Mass Media Communication. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. “Participation as User Involvement.” In Pragmatics of Social Media, HoPs 11, ed. by Christian Hoffmann, and Wolfram Bublitz, 31–59. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landert, Daniela, and Andreas Jucker. 2011. “Private and Public in Mass Media Communication: From Letters to the Editor to Online Commentaries.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (5): 1422–1434. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Alan J. 1976. The Origins of the Popular Press in England 1855–1914. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Marianne Hundt, Christian Mair, and Nicholas Smith. 2009. Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Locher, Miriam A. 2004. Power and Politeness in Action: Disagreements in Oral Communication. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lohmann, Arne. 2012. “A Processing View on Order in Reversible and Irreversible Binomials.” View[z] Vienna English Working Papers 211: 25–50.Google Scholar
Lutzky, Ursula, and Minna Nevala (eds). 2019. Reference and Identity in Public Discourses. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mair, Christian. 1997. “Parallel Corpora: A Real Time Approach to the Study of Language Change in Progress.” In Corpus-Based Studies in English, ed. by Magnus Ljung, 195–209. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mayhall, Laura E. Nym. 2003. The Militant Suffrage Movement. Citizenship and Resistance in Britain, 1860–1930. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary (online), Oxford: Oxford University Press. [URL]
Palander-Collin, Minna, and Minna Nevala. 2020. “Person Reference and Democratization.” Language Sciences 791: 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pugh, Martin. 2002. The March of the Women: A Revisionist Analysis of the Campaign for Women’s Suffrage, 1866–1914. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rühlemann, Christoph, and Karin Aijmer. 2015. “Corpus pragmatics: Laying the Foundations.” In Corpus Pragmatics. A Handbook, ed. by Karin Aijmer, and Christoph Rühlemann, 1–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sandvoss, Cornell. 2006. “Social constructionism.” In The Cambridge Dictionary of Sociology, ed. by Brian S. Turner, 569–571, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Silander, Daniel. 2005. Democracy from the Outside-In? The Conceptualization and Significance of Democracy Promotion. Växjö: Växjö University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Harold L. 2010. The British Women’s Suffrage Campaign 1866–1928. 2nd ed. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Soules, Marshall. 2015. Media, Persuasion and Propaganda. Edinburgh: Edinburg University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma; Andreas H. Jucker. 2015. “Twenty Years of Historical Pragmatics. Origins, Developments and Changing Thought Styles.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 16 (1): 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tusan, Michelle Elizabeth. 2005. Women Making News. Gender and Journalism in Modern Britain. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
VERBI Software. 2019. MAXQDA 2020 [Computer Software]. Berlin: VERBI Software.Google Scholar
Westin, Ingrid. 2002. Language Change in English Newspaper Editorials. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, Laurence. 2002. Democratization: Theory and Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corpora, primary sources and text collections
British Newspaper Archive, [URL]
The Times Digital Archive, [URL]