The rise of what-general extenders in English
General extenders (ges) are elements such as and so forth occurring at the right
periphery. On the referential level, they implicate a set, but they also serve a range of discourse-pragmatic functions, such as
hedging and interpersonal relations. Some sociolinguistic studies have seen the development of ges as synchronic
grammaticalization involving phonetic reduction, decategorialization, semantic bleaching and pragmatic enrichment, but other
studies have found no evidence of ongoing grammaticalization. Historical studies of ges are few. This paper sets out to
fill this gap by studying the rise of disjunctive, adjunctive and bare ges formed with what –
(or/and) what you will, or what, or/and what else, (or) whatever, (or/and) what not and (or/and) what
have you. Despite their apparent similarity, these are shown to have quite different sources and histories. Their
development conforms to some of the recognized parameters of grammaticalization but is more fruitfully understood from a
constructionist approach.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Characteristics of general extenders
- 3.Development of general extenders
- 3.1Grammaticalization
- 3.2
Contra grammaticalization
- 4.Diachronic work on general extenders
- 5.Histories of what-general extenders
- 5.1Diachronic corpora and methodology
- 5.2History of (or/and) what you will
- 5.3History of or what
- 5.4History of or/and what else
- 5.5History of or what(so)ever
- 5.6History of (or/and) what not
- 5.7History of what have you
- 5.8Summary
- 6.Discussion
- 6.1Grammaticalization revisited
- 6.2Constructionist approach
- 7.Conclusion
- Acknowledgments
- Notes
-
Corpora and tools
-
References
References (57)
Corpora and tools
Anthony, Laurence. 2018. AntConc. (Version
3.5.7) [MacIntosh]. Tokyo: Waseda University. Available online at: [URL]
ceal = Corpus of Early American
Literature. See Höglund and Syrjanen (2016).
cen = Corpus of English Novels. Created
by Hendrik De Smit. See: [URL]
clmet3.0 = Corpus of Late Modern English Texts, Version
3.0. Created by Hendrik De Smet, Hans-Jürgen Diller and Jukka Tyrkkö. See: [URL]
coca = The Corpus of Contemporary American
English. 2008–. Mark Davies (compiler). Available
online at: [URL]
coha = The Corpus of Historical American
English. 2010–. Mark Davies (compiler). Available
online at: [URL]
eebo = Early English Books Online
Corpus. 2017. Mark Davies (compiler). Available
online at: [URL]
The Globe and
Mail (1844–2014). ProQuest Historical
Newspapers. See: [URL]
The New York
Times (1851–1993). ProQuest Historical
Newspapers. See: [URL]
ob = The Old Bailey Proceedings
Online, 1674–1913. Tim Hitchcock, Robert Shoemaker, Clive Emsley, Sharon Howard and Jamie McLaughlin et al. (eds). Available
online at: [URL] (Version 7.0, March 2012.)
oed = Oxford English
Dictionary. 2000–. (Online. Third
edition.) Oxford: Oxford University Press. See: [URL]
References
Aijmer, Karin. 1985. “What
Happens at the End of Our Utterances? – The Use of Utterance-Final Tags Introduced by And and
Or
”. In Ole Togeby (ed.), Papers
from the Eighth Scandinavian Conference of
Linguistics, 366–389. Copenhagen: Institut for Nordisk Filologi, Københavns Universitet.
Aijmer, Karin. 2013. Understanding
Pragmatic Markers: A Variational Pragmatic
Approach. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Beeching, Kate and Ulrich Detges (eds). 2014. Discourse
Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language
Change. Leiden: Brill.
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman
Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow, Essex: Pearson.
Brinton, Laurel J. 2008. The Comment Clause in English:
Syntactic Origins and Pragmatic
Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brinton, Laurel J. 2014. “
If You
Choose/Like/Prefer/Want/Wish: The Origin of Metalinguistic and Politeness
Functions”. In Marianne Hundt (ed.), Late
Modern English
Syntax, 271–290. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brinton, Laurel J. 2017. The Evolution of Pragmatic Markers in
English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carroll, Ruth. 2007. “Lists
in Letters: NP-Lists and General Extenders in Early English
Correspondence”. In Isabel Moskowich-Spiegel and Begoña Crespo-García (eds), Bells
Chiming from the Past: Cultural and Linguistic Studies on Early
English, 37–53. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Carroll, Ruth. 2008. “Historical
English Phraseology and the Extender Tag”. SELIM: Journal of the Spanish Society for Medieval
English Language and
Literature 15 (1): 7–37.
Channell, Joanna. 1994. Vague
Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cheshire, Jenny. 2007. “Discourse
Variation, Grammaticalisation, and Stuff Like That”. Journal of
Sociolinguistics 12 (2): 155–193.
Dines, Elizabeth R. 1980. “Variation in Discourse and
‘Stuff Like That’”. Language in
Society 9 (1): 12–33.
Denis, Derek. 2015. The
Development of Pragmatic Markers in Canadian English. (PhD
thesis.) University of Toronto. Accessed 25 July
2020 at: [URL]
Enghels, Renata. 2018. “Towards
a Constructional Approach to Discourse-Level Phenomena: The Case of Spanish Interpersonal Epistemic Stance
Constructions”. Folia
Linguistica 52 (1): 107–138.
Erman, Britt. 1995. “Grammaticalization
in Progress: The Case of Or Something
”. In Inger Moen, Hanne Gram Simonsen and Helge Lødrup (eds), Papers
from The XVth Scandinavian Conference of
Linguistics, 136–147. Oslo. 12–15 January 1995. Oslo: Department of Linguistics, University of Oslo.
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar
Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, Adele E. 2018. “Constructionalist
Approaches”. In Thomas Hoffman and Graeme Trousdale (eds), The
Oxford Handbook of Construction
Grammar, 16–30. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hilpert, Martin. 2013. Constructional
Change in English: Developments in Allomorphy, Word Formation, and
Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hilpert, Martin. 2014. Construction
Grammar and its Application to
English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2004. “Lexicalization and
Grammaticalization: Opposite or Orthogonal?” In Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann and Björn Wiemer (eds), What
Makes Grammaticalization? A Look from its Fringes and its
Components, 21–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hoffmann, Thomas and Graeme Trousdale (eds). 2018. The
Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Höglund, Mikko and Kaj Syrjänen. 2016. “Corpus
of Early American Literature”. ICAME
Journal 40 (1): 17–38. Accessed 1 March 2021 at: [URL].
Hopper, Paul J. 1991. “On Some Principles of
Grammaticization”. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott and Bernd Heine (eds), Approaches
to
Grammaticalization, 17–35. (Volume 11.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hopper, Paul J. and Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. (Second
edition.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McColm, Dan and Graeme Trousdale. 2019. “Whatever
Happened to Whatever?
” In Nuria Yáñez-Bouza, Emma Moore, Linda van Bergen and Willem B. Hollmann (eds), Categories,
Constructions, and Change in English
Syntax, 81–104. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Overstreet, Maryann. 1999. Whales,
Candlelight, and Stuff Like That: General Extenders in English Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.
Overstreet, Maryann. 2014. “The
Role of Pragmatic Function in the Grammaticalization of English General
Extenders”. Pragmatics 24 (1): 105–129.
Overstreet, Maryann and George Yule. 1997. “On
Being Inexplicit and Stuff in Contemporary American English”. Journal of English
Linguistics 25 (3): 250–258.
Overstreet, Maryann and George Yule. 2021. General
Extenders: The Forms and Functions of a New Linguistic
Category. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Palacios Martínez, Ignacio M. 2011. “‘I Might, I Might Go I
Mean it Depends on Money Things and Stuff’: A Preliminary Analysis of General Extenders in British Teenagers’
Discourse”. Journal of
Pragmatics 43 (9): 2452–2470.
Pichler, Heike and Stephen Levey. 2011. “In
Search of Grammaticalization in Synchronic Dialect Data: General Extenders in Northeast
England”. English Language and
Linguistics 15 (3): 441–471.
Poutsma, Hendrik. 1916. A
Grammar of Late Modern English, for the Use of Continental, Especially Dutch, Students. (Part
II The Parts of Speech. Section I, B Pronouns and
Numerals.) Groningen: P. Noordhoff.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. 2016a. “Antecedents of Innovation:
Exploring General Extenders in Conservative Dialects”. In Heike Pichler (ed.), Discourse–Pragmatic
Variation and Change in English: New Methods and
Insights, 115–138. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. 2016b. Teen Talk: The Language of
Adolescents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. and Derek Denis. 2010. “The
Stuff of Change: General Extenders in Toronto, Canada”. Journal of English
Linguistics 38 (4): 335–368.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization
and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Van de Velde, Freek. 2014. “Degeneracy:
The Maintenance of Constructional Networks”. In Ronny Boogaart, Timothy Colleman and Gijsbert Rutten (eds), Extending
the Scope of Construction
Grammar, 141–179. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Winter, Joanne and Catrin Norrby. 2000. “Set
Marking Tags –‘and Stuff’”. In John Henderson (ed.), Proceedings
of the 1999 Conference of the Australian Linguistic
Society. Perth. 28 September to 2 October 1999. Accessed 18 August 2020 at: [URL]
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Salameh Jiménez, Shima
2023.
Paths of Constructionalization in Peninsular Spanish: The Development of “Pues Eso”. A 20th Century Case.
Languages 8:4
► pp. 289 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.