Article published In:
Journal of Historical Pragmatics: Online-First Articles

“I have come to the conclusion that you must die”

Threats in Late Modern English threatening letters

ORCID logo | TU Dortmund University
This paper explores the linguistic realisation of threats in a corpus of threatening letters discussed in Late Modern English (lmode) criminal trials at the Old Bailey. After investigating how trial participants ascribe the action of “threatening” to the utterance in question, I examine which aspects are repeatedly addressed in the letters and which linguistic patterns are employed to perform the threat. The results show that speakers routinely address the preparatory and sincerity conditions of commissives to negotiate whether a letter is threatening. Compared to present-day threats, lmode threats are considerably less speaker-focussed, and more threats explicitly specify threatener, target, and type of harm to be carried out. Linguistically, lmode threatening letters contain a greater amount of taboo language and more non-conditional and retaliative threats.
Keywords: commissives, impoliteness, letter, Old Bailey, speech act, threat
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical background
    • 2.1Research on threats as a speech act
    • 2.2Historical analyses of threatening language
    • 2.3Metapragmatic speech act analysis
  • 3.Data and methodology
    • 3.1Data
    • 3.2Methodology
  • 4.Results and discussion
    • 4.1Action ascription
    • 4.2Characterising threats
    • 4.3Linguistic patterns
  • 5.Conclusion and outlook
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 17 October 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.23016.neu
References (52)
References
Alonso-Almeida, Francisco and Mercedes Cabrera-Abreu. 2002. “The Formulation of Promise in Medieval English Medical Recipes: A Relevance-theoretic Approach”. Neophilologicus 86 (1): 137–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anthony, Lawrence. 2022. AntConc (Version 4.2.0). See: [URL]
Archer, Dawn. 2010. “Speech Acts”. In Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Historical Pragmatics, 397–417. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arnovick, Leslie K. 1994. “The Expanding Discourse of Promises in Present-Day English: A Case Study in Historical Pragmatics”. Folia Linguistica Historica 15 (1/2): 175–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999. Diachronic Pragmatics: Seven Case Studies in English Illocutionary Development. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Blanco Salgueiro, Antonio. 2010. “Promises, Threats, and the Foundations of Speech Act Theory”. Pragmatics 20 (2): 213–228.Google Scholar
Chapman, Don. 2008. “‘You Belly-guilty Bag’: Insulting Epithets in Old English”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 9 (1): 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Tanya K. 2019. “Indirect Threats as an Illegal Speech Act”. In Ken Ramshøj Christensen, Johanna Wood and Henrik Jørgensen (eds), The Sign of the V: Papers in Honour of Sten Vikner, 113–130. Aarhus: Aarhus University. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cockanye, Emily. 2023. Penning Poison: A History of Anonymous Letters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan and Michael Haugh. 2014. Pragmatics and the English Language. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan and Elena Semino. 2000. “Constructing Witches and Spells: Speech Acts and Activity Types in Early Modern England”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1 (1): 97–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf and Michael Haugh. 2022. “Action Ascription in Social Interaction”. In Arnulf Deppermann and Michael Haugh (eds), Action Ascription in Interaction, 3–27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 1998. “Threatening Revisited”. Forensic Linguistics 5 (2): 159–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gales, Tammy. 2010. “Ideologies of Violence: A Corpus and Discourse Analytic Approach to Stance in Threatening Communications”. (PhD thesis.) California: University of California.
Geis, Michael L. and Arnold M. Zwicky. 1971. “On Invited Inferences”. Linguistics Inquiry 2 (4): 561–566.Google Scholar
Harris, Sandra. 1984. “The Form and Function of Threats in Court”. Language & Communication 4 (4): 247–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Hattum, Marije. 2017. “The Language of ‘Ribbonmen’: A CDA Approach to Identity Construction in Nineteenth-century Irish English Threatening Notices”. Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 3 (2): 241–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hepburn, Alexa and Jonathan Potter. 2011. “Threats: Power, Family Mealtimes, and Social Influence”. British Journal of Social Psychology 50 (1): 99–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hitchcock, Tim, Robert Shoemaker, Clive Emsley, Sharon Howard and Jamie McLaughlin, et al. 2023. “The Old Bailey Proceedings Online, 1674–1913”. Accessed 13 September 2024 at: [URL]. (Version 9.0.)
Jackson, Leon. 2016. “The Spider and the Dumpling: Threatening Letters in 19th-Century America”. In Celeste-Marie Bernier, Judy Newman and Matthew Pethers (eds), The Edinburgh Companion to Nineteenth-Century American Letters and Letter-Writing, 152–168. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. 2000. “Slanders, Slurs and Insults on the Road to Canterbury: Forms of Verbal Aggression in Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales”. In Irma Taavitsainen, Terttu Nevalainen, Päivi Pahta and Matti Rissanen (eds), Placing Middle English in Context, 369–390. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019. “Speech Act Attenuation in the History of English: The Case of Apologies”. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 4 (1): 451.1–25.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. and Irma Taavitsainen. 2000. “Diachronic Speech Act Analysis: Insults from Flyting to Flaming”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1 (1): 67–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kerrigan, John. 2012. “Oaths, Threats and Henry V”. The Review of English Studies 63 (261): 551–571. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kohnen, Thomas. 2015. “Speech Acts: A Diachronic Perspective”. In Karin Aijmer and Christoph Rühlemann (eds), Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, 52–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leitner, Magdalena. 2015. “Conflicts in Early Modern Scottish Letters and Law-Courts”. (PhD thesis.) Glasgow: University of Glasgow.
Levinson, Stephen C. 2013. “Action Formation and Ascription”. In Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers (eds), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, 101–130. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Limberg, Holger. 2008. “Threats in Conflict Talk: Impoliteness and Manipulation”. In Derek Bousfield and Miriam A. Locher (eds), Impoliteness in Language: Studies on Its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, 155–179. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCracken, Donal P. 2021. You Will Dye at Midnight: Threatening Letters in Victorian Ireland. Dublin: Eastwood.Google Scholar
McEnery, Anthony and Zhonghua Xiao. 2004. “Swearing in Modern British English: The Case of ‘Fuck’ in the BNC”. Language and Literature 13 (3): 235–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muschalik, Julia. 2018. Threatening in English: A Mixed Method Approach. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nini, Andrea. 2017. “Register Variation in Malicious Forensic Texts”. International Journal of Speech, Language & the Law 24 (1): 99–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
oed online. n.d. “threat, v.” Accessed 3 March 2023 at: [URL].
. n.d. “threaten, v.” Accessed 3 March 2023 at: [URL].
Pakkala-Weckström, Mari. 2008. “‘No botmeles bihestes’: Various Ways of Making Binding Promises in Middle English”. In Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Speech Acts in the History of English, 133–162. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peters, Arne and Marije van Hattum. 2021. “Pseudonyms as Carriers of Contextualised Threat in 19th-century Irish English Threatening Notices”. English World-Wide 42 (1): 29–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pulham, Carol. 1996. “Promises, Promises: Dorigen’s Dilemma Revisited”. The Chaucer Review 311: 76–86.Google Scholar
Rudanko, Juhani. 2004. “‘I wol sterve’: Negotiating the Issue of a Lady’s Consent in Chaucer’s Poetry”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 5 (1): 137–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Klaus P. 2017. “Is that a Threat? Forms and Functions of Metapragmatic Terms in English Discourse”. AAA — Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 42 (2): 225–242.Google Scholar
2022. “Referring to Speech Acts in Communication: Exploring Meta Illocutionary Expressions in ICE Ireland”. Corpus Pragmatics 61: 155–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R. 1976. “A Classification of Illocutionary Acts”. Language in Society 5 (1): 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 (1965). “What is a Speech Act?” In Ian Hutchby (ed.), Methods in Language and Social Interaction, 1–16. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, Robert et al. 2023a. “Prosecuting Crime”. Accessed 13 September 2024 at: [URL]. (Version 9.0.)
2023b. “Crimes Tried at the Old Bailey”. Accessed 13 September 2024 at: [URL]. (Version 9.0.)
Taavitsainen, Irma and Andreas H. Jucker. 2007. “Speech Act Verbs and Speech Acts in the History of English”. In Susan M. Fitzmaurice and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Methods in Historical Pragmatics, 107–138. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. “Speech Acts Now and Then: Towards a Pragmatic History of English”. In Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Speech Acts in the History of English, 1–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Edward P. 2011. “The Crime of Anonymity”. In Douglas Hay, Peter Linebaugh, John G. Rule, Edward P. Thompson and Cal Winslow (eds), Albion’s Fatal Tree: Crime and Society in Eighteenth-Century England, 255–344. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Tiersma, Peter M. and Lawrence M. Solan. 2012. “The Language of Crime”. In Peter M. Tiersma and Lawrence M. Solan (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law, 340–353. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Timmis, Ivor. 2020. The Discourse of Desparation: Late 18th and Early 19th Century Letters by Paupers, Prisoners, and Rogues. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Unuabonah, Foluke O. 2017. “‘Are You Saying …?’ Metapragmatic Comments in Nigerian Quasi-judicial Public Hearings”. Pragmatics 27 (1): 115–144.Google Scholar
Yamanaka, Nobuhiko. 1995. “On Indirect Threats”. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 8 (1): 37–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar