Exploring conceptions of reading risk and program-specific literacy outcomes for Spanish speakers in dual language and
English-medium programs
Considerable research documents the efficacy of dual language programs for the reading achievement of English
learners from Spanish-speaking homes. However, there is uncertainty in the field of dual language education about how students
at-risk for literacy difficulties fare in these same programs, as well as questions about how risk should be defined – i.e.,
difficulty with decoding versus lower levels of vocabulary – with distinct understandings of risk potentially differentially
explaining students’ reading trajectories. This study followed Spanish-speaking students from Grades 3–5 to understand how students
at-risk for reading difficulties fare in English reading comprehension in dual language versus English-medium programs, examining
two different risk indicators in the process. Study results indicate that across risk categories, students performed equally well
regardless of program model. In addition, decoding was a more robust indicator of risk than vocabulary.
Article outline
- 1.The effects of bilingual instruction on literacy outcomes for English learners
- 2.Phase-specific literacy difficulties across development
- 3.The importance of vocabulary as a predictor of later reading ability
- 4.Methods
- 4.1Sample
- 4.2Measures
- 4.2.1Woodcock language proficiency battery-revised (WLPB-R)
- Picture vocabulary
- Word attack
- Passage comprehension
- 4.2.2Parent interview response sheet (PIRS)
- 4.3Data analysis
- 5.Results
- 5.1Research question 1: Do the English language and literacy profiles of DLE and EM students vary by risk status as determined by a vocabulary cut off score?
- 5.2Research question 2: Do different predictors of risk (i.e., decoding versus vocabulary) correlate with English reading comprehension in Grade 5 in DLE and EM programs?
- 5.3Research question 3: Is the relationship between risk status and English reading comprehension at the end of Grade 5 moderated by program model?
- 6.Discussion
- 7.Conclusion and educational implications
- Note
-
References