Cover not available
Article published In:
Morality and language aggression
Edited by Dániel Z. Kádár and Vahid Parvaresh
[Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 7:1] 2019
► pp. 79–104

Moral impoliteness

| Anglia Ruskin University, UK

This study is concerned with the increasing use of impolite language that one observes during interactions which take place over the Internet. Drawing on a number of Instagram posts uploaded by various socialites and public figures, this study proposes the notion of a ‘Basic Moral Perspective’ as being a window to an understanding of the nature of some impolite language witnessed on social media. I define ‘Basic Moral Perspective’ as the moral predisposition which interactants possess. As the study shows, in contexts in which there appears to be little relational history between interactants, the ‘Basic Moral Perspective’, amongst other factors, that interactants bring to an interaction can potentially result in impolite language. As will be shown throughout the study, the interactants’ Basic Moral Perspective can provide a clue as to how certain interactions are responded to.

Keywords: impoliteness, morality, aggression, Basic Moral Perspective, BMP, Instagram, social media
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The morally informed nature of social interaction
  • 3.Moral values in interaction
  • 4.Data
  • 5.Analysis
    • 5.1Care/Harm
    • 5.2Fairness/Cheating
    • 5.3Loyalty
    • 5.4Authority/Subversion
    • 5.5Sanctity/Degradation
  • 6.Conclusion and discussion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 June 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00020.par
References
Abell, Loren, and Gayle Brewer
2014 “Machiavellianism, Self-monitoring, Self-promotion and Relational Aggression on Facebook”. Computers in Human Behaviour 361: 258–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Archer, Dawn
2008 “Verbal Aggression and Impoliteness: Related or Synonymous?” In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on Its Interplay With Power in Theory and Practice, ed. by Derek Bousfield, and Miriam Locher, 181–210. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bell, Allan
1984 “Language Style as Audience Design”. Language in Society 13(2): 145–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bell, David M.
1997 “Innuendo.” Journal of Pragmatics 271: 35–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergmann, Jörg R.
1998 “Introduction: Morality in Discourse.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 311: 279–294.Google Scholar
Billig, Miriam
2013 “Loyalty under Stress: The Communal Psychology of Loyalty to a Place”. In Psychology of Loyalty, ed. by Miller, Luther B., and Wilbur C. Moore, 67–90. Hauppage, NY: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Blair, Robert J. R.
1995 “A Cognitive Developmental Approach to Morality: Investigating the Psychopath.” Cognition 57 (1): 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bloom, Paul
2010 How Pleasure Works: The New Science of Why We Like What We Like. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
2016 Against Empathy: The Case for Rational Compassion. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
Bossler, Adam M., Thomas J. Holt, and David C. May
2012 “Predicting Online Harassment Victimization among a Juvenile Population.” Youth and Society 44(4): 500–523. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bou-Franch, Patricia, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
2014 “The Pragmatics of Textual Participation in the Social Media.” Journal of Pragmatics 731: 1–3. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boyd, Danah
2014 It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. USA: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Donald
1991 Human Universals. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill Humanities.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Ying, Yilu Zhou, Sencun Zhu, and Heng Xu
2012 “Detecting Offensive Language in Social Media to Protect Adolescent Online Safety.” In Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust (PASSAT), 2012 International Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom), 71–80. IEEE. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan
2011 Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár
eds. 2017 The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (im)politeness. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, Bethan L.
2018 “Evaluating Evaluations: What Different Types of Metapragmatic Behaviour Can Tell Us about Participants’ Understandings of the Moral Order.” Journal of Politeness Research 14(1): 121–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Waal, Frans
2009 Primates and Philosophers: How Morality Evolved. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Decety, Jean, and Jason M. Cowell
2014 “The Complex Relation between Morality and Empathy.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 18 (7): 337–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
2016 “Metapragmatics, Hidden Assumptions, and Moral Economy.” In Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use, ed. by Keith Allan, Alessandro Capone, and Istvan Kecskes, 191–208. Springer: Switzerland. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, Christian
2017 Social Media: A Critical Introduction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
2010a “The YouTubification of Politics, Impoliteness and Polarization.” In Handbook of Research on Discourse Behaviour and Digital Communication: Language Structures and Social Interaction, ed. By Rotimi Taiwo, 540–563. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010b “A Genre Approach to the Study of Im/politeness. International Review of Pragmatics 2(1): 46–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gewirth, Alan
1981 Reason and Morality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Giner-Sorolla, Roger, Bernhard Leidner, and Emanuele Castano
2012 “Dehumanization, Demonization, and Morality Shifting: Paths to Moral Certainty in Extremist Violence.” In Extremism and the Psychology of Uncertainty, ed. by Michael A. Hogg, and Danielle L. Blaylock, 165–182. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1981 Forms of Talk. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Graham, Jesse, Brian A. Nosek, Jonathan Haidt, Ravi Iyer, Spassena Koleva, and Peter H. Ditto
2011 “Mapping the Moral Domain.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 101(2): 366–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, Herbert P.
1975 “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3, Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole, and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Haggard, Patrick
2008 “Human Volition: Towards a Neuroscience of Will.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 9 (12): 934–946. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haidt, Jonathan
2007 “The New Synthesis in Moral Psychology.” Science 3161: 998–1002. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 “The Moral Roots of Liberals and Conservatives. Retrieved from [URL]
2012 The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
Haidt, Jonathan, Silvia Helena Koller, and Maria G. Dias
1993 “Affect, Culture, and Morality, or Is It Wrong to Eat Your Dog?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65(4): 613–628. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haidt, Jonathan, and Craig Joseph
2004 “Intuitive Ethics: How Innately Prepared Intuitions Generate Culturally Variable Virtues.” Daedalus 1331: 55–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haidt, Jonathan, and Kesebir, Selin
2010 “Morality.” In Handbook of Social Psychology (5th ed.) ed. by Susan T. Fiske, Daniel T. Gilbert, and Gardner Lindzey. 797–832. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hardaker, Claire, and Mark McGlashan
2016 ““Real Men Don’t Hate Women”: Twitter Rape Threats and Group Identity.” Journal of Pragmatics 911: 80–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harper, Craig A., and Andrew J. Harris
2017 “Applying Moral Foundations Theory to Understanding Public Views of Sexual Offending.” Journal of Sexual Aggression 231: 111–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael
2013 “Im/politeness, Social Practice and the Participation Order.” Journal of Pragmatics 581: 52–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 Im/politeness Implicatures. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z.
2017 Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z., and Michael Haugh
2013 Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z., Vahid Parvaresh, and Puyu Ning
(2019/this issue). “Morality, Moral Order, and Language Conflict and Aggression – A position paper. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, Andreas M., and Michael Haenlein
2010 “Users of the World, Unite! The Challenges and Opportunities of Social Media.” Business Horizons 53(1): 59–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katz, Leonard D.
(ed.) 2000 Evolutionary Origins of Morality: Cross-disciplinary Perspectives. UK: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Kecskes, Istvan, Robert E. Sanders, and Anita Pomerantz
2018 “The Basic Interactional Competence of Language Learners.” Journal of Pragmatics 1241: 88–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Khurana, Atika, Amy Bleakley, Amy B. Jordan, and Daniel Romer
2015 “The Protective Effects of Parental Monitoring and Internet Restriction on Adolescents’ Risk of Online Harassment.” Journal of Youth and Adolescence 44(5): 1039–1047. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kohlberg, Lawrence
2008 “The Development of Children’s Orientations toward a Moral Order.” Human Development 51(1): 8–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lai, Calvin K., Jonathan Haidt, and Brian A. Nosek
2014 “Moral Elevation Reduces Prejudice against Gay Men.” Cognition and Emotion 28(5): 781–794. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lebel, Udi
2013 “Conditioned Loyalty and Military Strategic Refusal: The Military and Political Psychology of Loyalty.” In Psychology of Loyalty, ed. by Miller, Luther B., and Wilbur C. Moore, 1–36. New York: Nova Publishers.Google Scholar
Leman, Patrick J., and Gerard Duveen
1999 “Representations of Authority and Children’s Moral Reasoning.” European Journal of Social Psychology 29(5–6): 557–575. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Locher, Miriam A.
2013 “Relational Work and Interpersonal Pragmatics.” Journal of Pragmatics 581: 145–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Locher, Miriam A., and Richard J. Watts
2005 “Politeness Theory and Relational Work.” Journal of Politeness Research 1(1): 9–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 “Relational Work and Impoliteness: Negotiating Norms of Linguistic Behaviour.” In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on Its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, ed. by Derek Bousfield, and Miriam Locher, 1–13. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luckmann, Thomas
2002. “Moral Communication in Modern Societies.” Human Studies 251: 19–32. DOI logo
Márquez-Reiter, Rosina, and Michael Haugh
2019 “Denunciation, Blame and the Moral Turn in Public Life.” Discourse, Context & Media28: 35–43.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, Alan
2013 “Moral Disinhibition and the Psychology of Trolling.” Available at: [URL] (last accessed 2 Nov 2018).
Matley, David
2018 “ ‘This is NOT a# humblebrag, this is just a# brag’: The Pragmatics of Self-praise, Hashtags and Politeness in Instagram Posts. Discourse, Context and Media, 221: 30–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McDougall, W. R. Sorley
1908 An Introduction to Social Psychology. Methuen: London. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Luther B., and Wilbur C. Moore
2013 Psychology of Loyalty. NY: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Moran, Patrick R.
2001 Teaching Culture: Perspectives In Practice. Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle.Google Scholar
Page, Ruth
2014 “Saying ‘Sorry’: Corporate Apologies Posted on Twitter.” Journal of Pragmatics 621: 30–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parvaresh, Vahid, and Tahmineh Tayebi
2018 “Impoliteness, Aggression and the Moral Order.” Journal of Pragmatics 1321: 91–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, Simona, and Evelyne Pochon-Berger
2015 “The Development of L2 Interactional Competence: Evidence from Turn-taking Organization, SequenceOOrganization, Repair Organization and Preference Organization.” In Usage-based Perspectives on Second Language Learning, ed. by Teresa Cadierno, and Søren Wind Eskildsen, 233–268. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Prahalad, Coimbatore K., and Gary Hamel
1990 “The Core Competence of the Corporation.” Harvard Business Review, May-June Issue: 1–15.Google Scholar
Purzycki, Benjamin Grant, Joseph Henrich, Coren Apicella, Quentin D. Atkinson, Adam Baimel, Emma Cohen, Rita Anne McNamara, Aiyana K. Willard, Dimitris Xygalatas, and Ara Norenzayan
2018 “The Evolution of Religion and Morality: A Synthesis of Ethnographic and Experimental Evidence from Eight Societies.” Religion, Brain and Behavior 8(2): 101–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rai, Tage Shakti, and Alan Page Fiske
2011 “Moral Psychology is Relationship Regulation: Moral Motives for Unity, Hierarchy, Equality, and Proportionality.” Psychological Review 118(1): 57–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Recanati, François
2004 Literal Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2012 “Contextualism: Some Varieties.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Keith Allan, and Kassia, M. Jaszczolt, 135–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rösner, Leonie, and Nicole C. Krämer
2016 “Verbal Venting in the Social Web: Effects of Anonymity and Group Norms on Aggressive Language Use in Online Comments.” Social Media + Society 2(3). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seargeant, Philip, and Caroline Tagg
eds. 2014 The Language of Social Media: Identity and Community on the Internet. Springer: Switzerland. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Isaac H., Karl Aquino, Spassena Koleva, and Jesse Graham
2014 “The Moral Ties That Bind… Even to Out-Groups: The Interactive Effect of Moral Identity and the Binding Moral Foundations.” Psychological Science 25(8): 1554–1562. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen, and Kádár, Daniel Z.
2016 “The Bases of (Im)politeness Evaluations: Culture, the Moral Order and the East-West Debate.” East Asian Pragmatics 1(1): 73–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
2001 Relevance: Communication and Cognition. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Suhler, Christopher L., and Patricia Churchland
2011 “Can Innate, Modular “Foundations” Explain Morality? Challenges for Haidt’s Moral Foundations Theory.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 231: 2103–2116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tang, W. Y., and Fox, J.
2016 “Men’s Harassment Behavior in Online Video Games: Personality Traits and Game Factors.” Aggressive Behavior 42(6): 513–521. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tayebi, Tahmineh
2016 “Why Do People Take Offence? Exploring the Underlying Expectations.” Journal of Pragmatics 1011: 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 “Implying an Impolite Belief: A Case of TIKKEH in Persian.” Intercultural Pragmatics 15(1): 89–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tedeschi, James T., and Richard B. Felson
1994 Violence, Aggression, and Coercive Actions. USA: American Psychological Association. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina, Lydia Catedral, Iftikhar Haider, Farzad Karimzad, Jeriel Melgares, Cristina Mostacero-Pinilla, Julie Nelson, and Benjamin Weissman
2018 “Uncivil Twitter.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 6(1): 26–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thornborrow, Joanna, and Martin Montgomery
2010 “Editorial: Special Issue on Personalization in the Broadcast News Interview.” Discourse & Communication 41: 99–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tileagă, Cristian
2010 “Cautious Morality: Public Accountability, Moral Order and Accounting for a Conflict of Interest.” Discourse Studies 121: 223–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 “Public Apologia, moral Transgression and Degradation Ceremonies.” Psihologia Sociala 301: 67–78.Google Scholar
Turiel, Elliot
1998 “The Development of Morality. In Handbook of Child Psychology (5th ed.), ed. By William Kuhn, Deanna Siegler, and Robert S. Damon, 863–932. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Van Vugt, Eveline, Geert Jan Stams, Maja Dekovic, Daan Brugman, Esther Rutten, and Jan Hendriks
2008 “Moral Development of Solo Juvenile Sex Offenders.” Journal of Sexual Aggression 141: 99–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard
2010 “Linguistic Politeness Theory and Its Aftermath: Recent Research Trails.” In Interpersonal Pragmatics, ed. by Miriam Locher, and Graham Sage, 43–70. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Wheatley, Thalia, and Jonathan Haidt
2005 “Hypnotic Disgust Makes Moral Judgments More Severe.” Psychological Science 16(10): 780–784. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whittaker, Elizabeth, and Robin M. Kowalski
2015 “Cyberbullying via Social Media.” Journal of School Violence 14(1): 11–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, Bernard
2012 Morality: An Introduction to Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ye, Zhengdao
2018 “The Politeness Bias and the Society of Strangers.” Language Sciences. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele
2012 Discourse of Twitter and Social Media: How We Use Language to Create Affiliation on the Web. London: Continuum International.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 19 other publications

Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed
2023. Cartooning and sexism in the time of Covid-19: Metaphors and metonymies in the Arab mind. Discourse & Society 34:2 ► pp. 147 ff. DOI logo
Altahmazi, Thulfiqar Hussein M.
2022. Impoliteness in Twitter diplomacy: offence giving and taking in Middle East diplomatic crises. Journal of Politeness Research 18:2 ► pp. 281 ff. DOI logo
Blitvich, Pilar Garcés-Conejos & Dániel Z. Kádár
2021. Morality in Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 385 ff. DOI logo
Bou-Franch, Patricia
2021. Evaluation, Conflict and Prescriptive Metapragmatic Comments: (Re)constructing Transmedia Stories. In Analyzing Digital Discourses, ► pp. 189 ff. DOI logo
Bou-Franch, Patricia
2022. Morality, aggression, and social activism in a transmedia sports controversy. Language & Communication 84 ► pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Boukhris, Khouloud
2023. Online gaming and language aggression in a Tunisian Arabic context. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 19:2 ► pp. 255 ff. DOI logo
Etaywe, Awni
2022. Exploring the grammar of othering and antagonism as enacted in terrorist discourse: verbal aggression in service of radicalisation. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 9:1 DOI logo
Haugh, Michael
2022. (Online) public denunciation, public incivilities and offence. Language & Communication 87 ► pp. 44 ff. DOI logo
Haugh, Michael, Dániel Z. Kádár & Rosina Márquez Reiter
2022. Offence and morality: Pragmatic perspectives. Language & Communication 87 ► pp. 117 ff. DOI logo
Horgan, Mervyn
2021. Sacred civility? An alternative conceptual architecture informed by cultural sociology. Journal of Politeness Research 17:1 ► pp. 9 ff. DOI logo
Kádár, Dániel Z., Vahid Parvaresh & Puyu Ning
2019. Morality, moral order, and language conflict and aggression. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 7:1 ► pp. 6 ff. DOI logo
Parvaresh, Vahid
2022. On the morality of taking offence. Language & Communication 87 ► pp. 60 ff. DOI logo
Parvaresh, Vahid
2023. Covertly communicated hate speech: A corpus-assisted pragmatic study. Journal of Pragmatics 205 ► pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
Parvaresh, Vahid & Tahmineh Tayebi
2021. Taking offence at the (un)said:Towards a more radical contextualist approach. Journal of Politeness Research 17:1 ► pp. 111 ff. DOI logo
Saz-Rubio, Ma Milagros del
2023. Assessing impoliteness-related language in response to a season's greeting posted by the Spanish and English Prime Ministers on Twitter. Journal of Pragmatics 206 ► pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Tayebi, Tahmineh
2020. Heterogeneous distribution of cultural conceptualizations and (im)politeness evaluations. International Journal of Language and Culture 7:1 ► pp. 84 ff. DOI logo
Tayebi, Tahmineh
2021. Conceptualizations of ugly and beautiful. International Journal of Language and Culture 8:1 ► pp. 128 ff. DOI logo
Xie, Chaoqun
2021. Philosophizing (Im)politeness: Lived Experience, Desire and Human Nature. In The Philosophy of (Im)politeness [Advances in (Im)politeness Studies, ], ► pp. 225 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Topics and Settings in Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 247 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.