Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict
Vol. 7:2 (2019) ► pp.293–320

Alternative truths and delegitimization pragmatic strategies around the 2018 Italian elections

 | Università di Firenze, Italy
 | Università di Firenze, Italy
 | Università di Firenze, Italy
In this paper we aim at analysing, from a pragmatic viewpoint, the rhetoric of delegitimization of the opponent in new media insofar as it triggers individual, uncontrolled and deep-rooted forms of communications. The communicative context is that of the political controversies and the propaganda around the Italian elections of March 2018. Accusations of fake news, hate speech and other delegitimizing rhetorical tools occur within the messages distributed on social media by politicians. We are specifically interested in illustrating and examining the disposition/standpoint of public social actors, of politicians in particular, toward the (delegitimizing) effects of the spreading of foul language, hate speech and fake news as instruments for re-shaping reality and introducing an alternative reading of facts.
Keywords: political discourse, delegitimizing rhetoric strategies, pragmatic tools, alternative truths
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The language of opposing ideologies: Extremist language in the literature
    • 2.1Pragmalinguistic research on delegitimization in political discourse
  • 3.Methods. Theoretical framework and data: The deep substratum of alternative truths
  • 4.The alternative semantics of populist and sovereignist parties: Discussion of rhetorical devices
  • 5.Fake news and delegitimization: The public debate around the 2018 Italian elections
  • 6.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 30 July 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00029.bal
References (69)
References
Austin, John L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford-London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baldi, Benedetta, and Ludovico Franco. 2015. “(De)legitimization strategies in the austere prose of Palmiro Togliatti.” QULSO 11: 139–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baldi, Benedetta, and Leonardo M. Savoia. 2009. “Metafora e ideologia nel linguaggio politico.” Lingua italiana d’oggi 61: 119–165.Google Scholar
Berger, Peter L., and Thomas Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Blass, Regina. 2005. “Manipulation in the Speech and Writings of Hitler and the NSDAP from a Relevance-Theoretic Viewpoint.” In Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century, edited by Louis de Saussure and Peter Schulz, 169–190. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Block, David. 2019. Post-truth and Political Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 2001. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Caiani, Manuela. 2011. “L’estrema destra in Italia fra passato e presente: il discorso sulla globalizzazione in Societa.” Mutamento e Politica 21:133–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caiani, Manuela, and Donatella della Porta. 2011. “The Elitist Populism of the Extreme Right: A Frame Analysis of extreme Right Wing Discourses in Italy and Germany”. Acta Politica, 46/21: 180–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cap, Piotr. 2008. “Towards the Proximization Model of the Analysis of Legitimization in Political Discourse”. Journal of Pragmatics 401:17–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Proximization: The Pragmatics of Symbolic Distance Crossing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Capone, Alessandro. 2010. “Barack Obama’s South Carolina Speech”. Journal of Pragmatics 421:2964–2977. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chadwick, Andrew. 2013. The Hybrid Media System. Politics and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chilton, Paul A. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005. “Manipulation, Memes and Metaphors”. In Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century, edited by Louis de Saussure and Peter Schulz, 15–43. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chilton, Paul A., and Mikhail Ilyin. 1993. “Metaphor in Political Discourse”. Discourse & Society 41: 7–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1988. Language and Problems of Knowledge: The Managua Lectures. Cambridge: Mass., MIT Press.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. Impoliteness. Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enzi, Aldo. 2012. Il lessico della violenza nella Germania nazista. Milano: Pgreco.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analyzing Discourse. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernbach, Philip M., Todd Rogers, Craig R. Fox, and Steven Sloman. 2013. “Political Extremism is Supported by an Illusion of Understanding.” Psychological Science 241:939–946. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gainous, Jason, and Kevin M. Wagner. 2013. Tweeting to Power. The Social Media Revolution in American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1984 [1981]. Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston, MA.: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Hardin, Russell. 2002. “The Crippled Epistemology of Extremism.” In Political Extremism and Rationality, edited by Albert Breton, Gianluigi Galeotti, Pierre Salmon, and Ronald Wintrobe, 3–22. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hellin Garcia, María José. 2013. “Legitimization and Delegitimization Strategies on Terrorism”. Pragmatics 231:301–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1977. The Silent Revolution. Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
. 2018. Cultural Evolution. People’s Motivations Are Changing and Reshaping the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joseph, John E. 2006. Language and Politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kampf, Zohar. 2015. “The Politics of Being Insulted. The Uses of Hurt Feelings in Israeli Public Discourse.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 3(1):107–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kienpointner, Manfred. 1997. “Varieties of Rudeness: Types and Functions of Impolite Utterances.” Functions of Language 4(2):251–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 2007. “Basic Notions of Information Structure.” In Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure, vol. 61, ISIS, Working Papers of the SFB 6321, edited by Caroline Féry and Manfred Krifka, University of Potsdam.Google Scholar
Kruglanski, Arie W., Antonio Pierro, Lucia Mannetti, and Eraldo De Grada. 2006. “Groups as Epistemic Providers: Need for Closure and the Unfolding of Group-centrism.” Psychological Review 1131: 84–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1996. Moral Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 2006. Simple Framing. An Introduction to Framing and its Use in Politics. Berkeley, CA: Rockridge Institute.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we Live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin Tolmach. 1990. Talking Power. The Politics of Language. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1990. “How to Do Things with Junk: Exaptation in Language Evolution”. Journal of Linguistics 261:79–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewandowsky, Stephan, Ullrich Ecker, and John Cook. 2017. “Beyond Misinformation: Understanding and Coping with the “Post-Truth” Era.” Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 6(4):353–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lucisano, Pietro, and Maria Emanuela Piemontese. 1988. Gulpease: una formula per la predizione della difficoltà dei testi in lingua italiana. Scuola e Città XXXIX(3):110–124.Google Scholar
Maillat, Didier. 2013. “Constraining Context Selection: On the Pragmatic Inevitability of Manipulation”. Journal of Pragmatics 591:190–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martín Rojo, Luisa, and Teun van Dijk. 1997. “There was a Problem, and it was Solved! Legitimating the Expulsion of ‘Illegal’ Migrants in Spanish Parliamentary Discourse.” Discourse & Society 81:523–566. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oddo, John. 2011. “War Legitimation Discourse: Representing ‘Us’ and ‘Them’ in Four US Presidential Addresses”. Discourse & Society 221:287–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ondelli, Stefan. 2018. “L’identificazione del nemico: un’analisi dei tweet di Matteo Salvini dal 2011 al 2018”. Ms, Trieste.Google Scholar
Quattrociocchi, Walter, and Antonella Vicini. 2016. Misinformation. Guida alla società dell’informazione e della credulità, Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Reyes, Antonio. 2009. “Discursive Strategies in Chávez’s Political Discourse”. Critical Discourse Studies 51:133–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “Strategies of Legitimization in Political Discourse: From Words to Actions.” Discourse & Society 221:781–807. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rolfe, Mark. 2016. The Reinvention of Populist Rhetoric in the Digital Age: Insiders & Outsiders in Democratic Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, Andrew, and Damian Rivers. 2017. “Digital Cultures of Political Participation: Internet Memes and the Discursive Delegitimization of the 2016 US Presidential Candidates.” Discourse, Context and Media 161:1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruzza, Carlo, and Laura Balbo. 2013. “Italian Populism and the Trajectories of Two Leaders: Silvio Berlusconi and Umberto Bossi.” In Right-Wing Populism in Europe: Politics and Discourse, edited by Ruth Wodak, Majid Khosravinik, and Brigitte Mral, 163–176. UK: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Rydgren, Jens. 2008. “Immigration Sceptics, Xenophobes or Racists? Radical Right-wing Voting in Six West European Countries”. European Journal of Political Research 471:737–765. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saussure Louis, de. 2008. “Procedural Pragmatics and the Study of Discourse.” Pragmatics and Cognition 151:139–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 2003. Talking Politics: The Substance of Style from Abe to “W.”. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.Google Scholar
Snow, David A., R. Burke Rochford, Jr., Steven K. Worden, and Robert D. Benford. 1986. “Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation.” American Sociological Review 511: 464–481. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. 1986. Relevance, Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Swami, Viren. 2012. “Social Psychological Origins of Conspiracy Theories: The Case of the Jewish Conspiracy Theory in Malaysia.” Frontiers in Psychology 31: 1–9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tandoc, Edson C. Jr., Zheng Wei Lim, and Richard Ling. 2018. “Defining ‘Fake News’.” Digital Journalism 6(2):137–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vaara, Eero. 2014. “Struggles over Legitimacy in the Eurozone Crisis: Discursive Legitimation Strategies and their Ideological Underpinnings.” Discourse & Society 251:500–518. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, Teun. 1998. Ideology. A Multidisciplinary Study. London: Sage.Google Scholar
. 2005. “War Rhetoric of a Little Ally: Political Implicatures and Aznar’s Legitimatization of the War in Iraq.” Journal of Language and Politics 41: 65–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo, and Ruth Wodak. 1999. “Legitimizing Immigration Control: A Discourse-Historical Analysis.” Discourse Studies 11:83–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo. 2007. “Legitimation in Discourse and Communication.” Discourse and Communication 11:91–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Prooijen, Jan Willem, Andre Krouwel, and Thomas Pollett. 2015. “Political Extremism Predicts Belief in Conspiracy Theories.” Social Psychological and Personality Science 6(5):570–578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wright, Thomas L., and Jack Arbuthnot. 1974. “Interpersonal Trust, Political Preference, and Perceptions of the Watergate Affair.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 11:168–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2011. The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
. 2015. The Politics of Fear. What Right-wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Baldi, Benedetta
2023. The Strategic Use of Debasing and Vulgar Language in Italy’s Contemporary Politics: Beppe Grillo and Matteo Salvini. In Debasing Political Rhetoric, ► pp. 165 ff. DOI logo
Ivanović, Ljubomir & Milica Vuković-Stamatović
2023. Use of Labels and Attributes for Degrading Opponents in Montenegro’s Political Discourse. In Political Debasement, ► pp. 149 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Chris, Michael J. Platow & Eryn J. Newman
2023. There is an ‘I’ in truth: How salient identities shape dynamic perceptions of truth. European Journal of Social Psychology 53:2 ► pp. 383 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.