Offence is a central concept in impoliteness, aggression and conflict research, yet has received only passing
mention in definitions of impoliteness and related concepts. Janicki (2017) argues that
impoliteness and language aggression scholars are needlessly worried about definitions. We use Janicki’s (2017) work as a springboard into a discussion of definitions of impolite or taboo language, airing
potential problems and suggesting that the study of metalanguage offers at least a partial solution. We report a study of the
metalanguage of offence in British English, and briefly examine whether there are any differences in Australian English,
using SketchEngine to interrogate data in the two-billion word Oxford English Corpus. In so doing, we tease out different uses of
the term offensive, and show that concepts such as offence are coloured by the specific linguistic and
cultural contexts in which they appear. We conclude that while corpus-based metalinguistic analyses cannot completely eliminate
the problem of definitional infinite regress, they do, however, offer an empirically grounded way of defining words that allows us
to move beyond the intuitions of individual researchers.
2019 “Taboo Words and Language: An Overview.” In The Oxford Handbook of Taboo Words and Language, edited by Keith Allan, 1–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bach, Kent
2001 “You Don’t Say?” Synthese 128 (1/2):15–44.
Berger, Peter, and Thomas Luckmann
1966The Social Construction of Reality. NY: Doubleday.
Blumczyński, Piotr
2013 “Turning the Tide: A Critique of Natural Semantic Metalanguage from a Translation Studies Perspective.” Translation Studies 6 (3):261–276.
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson
1987Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cameron, Deborah
2004 “Out of the Bottle: The Social Life of Metalanguage.” In Metalanguage, edited by Adam Jaworski, Nikolas Coupland and Dariusz Galasinski, 311–322. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Coleman, Linda, and Paul Kay
1981 “Prototype Semantics: The English Word ‘Lie’”. Language 57(1):26–44.
Cook, Paul, and Laurel J. Brinton
2017 “Building and Evaluating Web Corpora Representing National Varieties of English.” Language Resources and Evaluation 511:643–662.
Coupland, Nikolas, and Adam Jaworski
2004 “Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Metalanguage: Reflexivity, Evaluation and Ideology.” In Metalanguage. Social and Ideological Perspectives, edited by Adam Jaworski, Nikolas Coupland and Dariusz Galasiński, 15–51. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Croft, William
2001Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Culpeper, Jonathan
2009 “The Metalanguage of impoliteness: Using Sketch Engine to Explore the Oxford English Corpus.” In Contemporary Corpus Linguistics, edited by Paul Baker, 66–88. London: Continuum.
Culpeper, Jonathan
2011Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Culpeper, Jonathan, and Michael Haugh
2014Pragmatics and the English Language. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Culpeper, Jonathan, and Michael Haugh
Forthcoming. (Im)politeness and Sociopragmatics: In Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics edited by Michael Haugh, Dániel Z. Kádár and Marina Terkourafi Cambridge Cambridge University Press
Dewaele, Jean-Marc
2019 “Linguistic Taboos in a Second or Foreign Language.” In The Oxford Handbook of Taboo Words and Language, edited by Keith Allan, 218–232. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Eelen, Gino
2001A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St. Jerome.
Firth, John R.
1957 “A Synopsis of Linguistic Theory 1930–1955.” In Studies in Linguistic Analysis, edited by John R. Firth, 1–32. Oxford: Philological Society.
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Haugh, Michael
2012 “The First-Second Order Distinction in Face and Politeness Research.” Journal of Politeness Research 8(1):111–134.
Haugh, Michael
2015 “Impoliteness and Taking Offence in Initial Interactions.” Journal of Pragmatics 861:36–42.
Haugh, Michael
2016 “The Role of English as a Scientific Metalanguage for Research in Pragmatics: Reflections on the Metapragmatics of ‘Politeness’ in Japanese.” East Asian Pragmatics 1 (1):39–71.
Haugh, Michael
2018 “Corpus-based Metapragmatics.” In Methods in Pragmatics, edited by Andreas H. Jucker, Klaus P. Schneider and Wolfram Bublitz, 619–643. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Haugh, Michael
2019 “The Metapragmatics of Consideration in (Australian and New Zealand) English.” In From Speech Acts to Lay Understandings of Politeness, edited by Eva Ogiermann and Pilar G. Blitvich, 201–225. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haugh, Michael, and Valeria Sinkeviciute
2019 “Offence and Conflict Talk.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language in Conflict, edited by Matthew Evans, Lesley Jeffries and Jim O’Driscoll, 196–214. London: Routledge.
Hübler, Alex
2011 “Metapragmatics.” In Foundations of Pragmatics, edited by Wolfram Bublitz and Neal R. Norrick, 107–136. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hübler, Axel, and Ulrich Busse
2012 “Introduction.” In Investigations into the Meta-Communicative Lexicon in English, edited by Ulrich Busse and Axel Hübler, 1–16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Jakobson, Roman
1960 “Linguistics and Poetics.” In Style in Language, edited by Thomas Sebeok, 350–377. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Janicki, Karol
1999Against Essentialism: Toward Language Awareness. Munich: Lincom Europa.
Janicki, Karol
2006Language Misconceived. Arguing for Applied Cognitive Sociolinguistics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Janicki, Karol
2010 “Lay People’s Language Problems.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 20 (1):73–94.
2019 “The Psychology of Expressing and Interpreting Linguistic Taboos.” In The Oxford Handbook of Taboo Words and Language, edited by Keith Allan, 77–95. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jucker, Andreas
2020Politeness in the History of English. From the Middle Ages to the Present Day. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kádár, Dániel Z., and Michael Haugh
2013Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kilgarriff, Adam, Pavel Rychlý, Pavel Smrz, and David Tugwell
2004 “Sketch Engine.” Proceedings of Euralex, 105–116. Lorient, France.
Popper, Karl
1945The Open Society and its Enemies. London: Routledge.
Popper, Karl R.
1979Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rychlý, Pavel
2008 “A Lexicographer-friendly Association Score.” In Proceedings of Second Workshop on Recent Advances in Slavonic Natural Languages Processing, RASLAN 2008, edited by Petr Sojka and Aleš Horák. Brno: Masaryk University.
Rosch, Eleanor
1975 “Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 104(3):192–233.
Scheff, Thomas J.
2006 “Concepts and Concept Formation: Goffman and beyond.” Qualitative Sociology Review 2 (3):48–64.
2017 “The Relationship between Irony and Sarcasm: Insights from a First-order Metalanguage Investigation.” Journal of Politeness Research 12 (1):209–241.
Terkourafi, Marina
2005 “Beyond the Micro-level in Politeness Research.” Journal of Politeness Research 1 (2):237–262.
Terkourafi, Marina
2011 “From Politeness1 to Politeness2: Tracking Norms of Im/politeness across Time and Space.” Journal of Politeness Research 7 (2):159–185.
Trier, Jost
1931Der deutsche Wortschatz im Sinnbezirk des Verstandes: Die Geschichte eines sprachlichen Feldes: Vol. 1. Von den Anfangen bis zum Beginn des 13. Jahrhunderts. Heidelberg: Winter.
Ullmann, Stephen
1962Semantics: An Introduction to the Science of Meaning. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
2012 “ ‘It’s Rude to VP’: The Cultural Semantics of Rudeness.” Journal of Pragmatics 441:1051–1062.
Watts, Richard
2003Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Watts, Richard
2005 “Linguistic Politeness Research: Quo vadis?”. In Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, edited by Richard Watts, Sachiko Ide and Konrad Ehlich, xi–xlvii. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Watts, Richard, Sachiko Ide, and Konrad Ehlich
1992 “Introduction.” In Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, edited by Richard Watts, Sachiko Ide and Konrad Ehlich, 1–17. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Wierzbicka, Anna
1972Semantic Primitives. Frankfurt: Athenäum.
Wierzbicka, Anna
1988The Semantics of Grammar. (Studies in Language Companion Series 8). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig
1958Philosophical Investigations. Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe. 3rd ed. New York: Macmillan.
Cited by
Cited by 14 other publications
Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed
2021. Multimodal metaphor and (im)politeness in political cartoons: A sociocognitive approach. Journal of Pragmatics 185 ► pp. 54 ff.
Bączkowska, Anna
2021. “You’re too thick to change the station” – Impoliteness, insults and responses to insults on Twitter. Topics in Linguistics 22:2 ► pp. 62 ff.
Culpeper, Jonathan
2021. Impoliteness and hate speech: Compare and contrast. Journal of Pragmatics 179 ► pp. 4 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.