This study examines how the pre-war debate of the U.S. decision to invade Iraq was discursively constructed in pro- and anti-war newspaper op/ed argumentation. Drawing on insights from argumentation theory, and using these within a framework of Critical Discourse Analysis, we explore fallacious arguments within the ‘justification discourse’ used in the pro-war opinion/editorials (op/eds). We argue that the type of arguments marshalled by the pro-war op/ed commentators uncritically bolstered the set of U.S. official ‘truth claims’ and ‘presuppositions’. Conversely, anti-war op/ed debaters dismissed the Bush administration’s ‘neo-imperialistic’ reasoning and called into question the logic of militarist ‘humanitarianism’ by arguing that brute force and daylight ‘plunder,’ found in the language of a ‘noble ideal,’ were part of a long Western colonialist tradition that glorified the West as the ‘civiliser’ of distant cultural others.
2005War Programming: the propaganda project and the Iraq War. The Sociological Quarterly 461, 617—643.
Aronovitch, Hillard
1997The political importance of analogical argument. Political Studies XLV1, 78—92.
Beinin, Joel
2004The new American McCarthyism: policing thought about the Middle East. Race & Class 46 (1), 101—115.
Bekalu, Mesfin Awoke
2006Presupposition in news discourse. Discourse & Society 17 (2), 147—172.
Bellamy, Alex J
2004Ethics and intervention: the ‘humanitarian exception’ and the problem of abuse in the case of Iraq. Journal of Peace Research 41 (2),131—147.
Benson, Rodney and Hallin, Daniel C
2007How states, markets and globalization shape the news: The French and US national press, 1965—97. European Journal of Communication 22 (1), 27—48.
Blommaert, Jan and Verschueren, Jef
1998Debating Diversity: Analysing the Discourse of Tolerance. London: Routledge.
Boggs, Carl and Pollard, Tom
2006Hollywood and the spectacle of terrorism. New Political Science 28 (3), 335—351.
Crick, Ruth D. and Joldersma, Clarence W
2007Habermas, lifelong learning and citizenship education. Studies in Philosophy and Education 261, 77—95.
Cummings, Louise
2004Rejecting the urge to theorise in fallacy Inquiry. Argumentation 181, 61—94.
Degano, Chiara
2007Presupposition and dissociation in discourse: A corpus study. Argumentation 211, 361—378.
De Wijze, Stephen
2003Complexity, relevance and character: Problems with teaching the ad hominem fallacy. Educational Philosophy and Theory 35 (1), 31—56.
Dijk,Teun A. Van
1998Opinions and ideologies in the press. In: Allan Bell, and Peter Garrett (eds). Approaches to Media Discourse. Oxford:Blackwell, 21—63
Eemeren, Frans H. van and Grootendorst, Rob
1992Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers: Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
Eemeren, Frans H. van, and Grootendorst, Rob
1995The Pragma-Dialectical approach to fallacies. In: Hans V. Hansen and Robert C. Pinto (eds.). Fallacies: Classical and Contemporary Readings. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 130—144.
Eemeren Frans H. Van, Grootendorst Rob, Snoeck Henkemans A. Francisca, Blair J. Anthony, Johnson Ralph H., Krabbe Erick C.W., Plantin Christian, Walton Douglas N., Willard Charles A., Woods John and David Zarefsky
1996Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Eemeren Frans H. van, Meuffels Bert and Verburg Mariël
2000The (un)reasonableness of ad Hominem fallacies. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 191, 416—435.
Eemeren Frans H. van and Grootendorst Rob
2004A Systematic Theory of Argumentation:The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eemeren, Frans H. van and Houtlosser, Peter
1999Strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse. Discourse Studies 1 (4), 479—497.
Eemeren, Frans H. van and Houtlosser, Peter
2006Strategic maneuvering: A synthetic recapitulation. Argumentation 201, 381—392.
Feteris, Eveline T
2000A dialogical theory of legal discussions: Pragma-Dialectical analysis and evaluation of legal argumentation. Artificial Intelligence and Law 81, 115—135.
Feteris, Eveline T
2002A Pragma-Dialectical approach of the analysis and evaluation of pragmatic argumentation in a legal context. Argumentation 161, 349—367.
Gerges, Fawaz A
1999America and Political Islam: Clashes of Cultures or Clashes of Interests? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Greenberg, Joshua and Hier, Sean
2001Crisis, mobilization and collective problematization: ‘illegal’ Chinese migrants and the Canadian news media. Journalism Studies 2 (4), 563—583.
Hackett, Robert A. and Zhao, Yuezhi
1994Challenging a master narrative: Peace protest and opinion/editorial discourse in the US press during the Gulf war. Discourse & Society 5 (4), 509—541.
Hallin, Daniel C. and Mancini, Paolo
2004Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hartnett, Stephen J. and Stengrim, Laura A
2004‘The whole operation of deception’: Reconstructing President Bush’s rhetoric of weapons of mass descruction. Cultural Studies Critical Methodologies 4 (2), 152—197.
2004On the theoretical unification and nature of fallacies. Argumentation 181, 189—201.
Ismael, Tareq Y. and Ismael, Jacqueline S
2005Whither Iraq? Beyond Saddam, sanctions and occupation. Third World Quarterly 26 (4—5), 609—629.
Jacobs, Scott
2002Messages, Functional Contexts, and Categories of Fallacy. In: Frans van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosser (eds.). Dialectic and Rhetoric: the Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 119—130.
2002Colloquy: Talking in and about conflict—discourse studies of conflict processes. What mediators do with words: implementing three models of rational dispute mediation. Conflict Resolution Quaterly 20 (2), 177—203.
Kornprobst, Markus
2007Comparing apples and oranges? Leading and misleading uses of historical analogies. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 36 (1), 29—49.
Kull, Steven, Ramsay, Clay and Lewis, Evan
2004Misperceptions, the media, and the Iraq War. Political Science Quarterly 118 (4), 569—598.
Lafollette, Hugh
2005Living on a slippery slope. The Journal of Ethics 91, 475—499.
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M
1999Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books
2010Argumentations, and CDA, presentation at Language, ideology and politics Workshop, Lancaster University 27th January 2010.
Manolescu, Beith Innocenti
2006A normative pragmatic perspective on appealing to emotions in argumentation. Argumentation 201, 327—343.
Mearsheimer, John J. and Walt, Stephen M
2006The Israel lobby and U.S. foreign policy. Middle East Policy XIII (3), 29—87.
Morgan, Glyn
2008Security, stability, and international Order. American Behavioral Scientist 51 (9), 1322—1338.
Nikolaev, Alexander and Porpora, Douglas
2007Talking war: How elite U.S. newspaper editorials and opinion pieces debated the attack on Iraq. Sociological Focus 40 (1), 6—25.
Powers, Lawerence
1995The one fallacy theory. Informal Logic 171, 303—314.
Reisigl, Martin and Wodak, Ruth
2001Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.
Reynolds, Mike
2000The blending of narrative and argument in the generic texture of newspaper editorials. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 10 (1), 25—40.
Richardson, John E. and Wodak, Ruth
2009Recontextualising fascist ideologies of the past: right-wing discourses on employment and nativism in Austria and the United Kingdom. Critical Discourse Studies 6 (4), 251—267.
Sahlane, Ahmed
2009The Discursive (Re)construction of the 2003 Iraq War in Pro- and Anti-War Opinion/Editorial Argumentation: A Critical Discourse Analytic Approach. Unpublished Ph D Thesis, The University of Ulster, School of Communication, Belfast, UK.
2006Two forms of the straw man. Argumentation 201, 345—352.
Walton, Douglas
1989Informal Logic: A Handbook for Critical Argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Walton, Douglas
1996Argumentation for Presumptive Reasoning. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Walton, Douglas
2002The sunk costs fallacy or argument from waste. Argumentation 161, 473—503.
Walton, Douglas
2004Argumentation schemes and historical origins of the circumstantial Ad Hominem Argument. Argumentation 181, 359—368.
Warren, John
2005War and the cultural heritage of Iraq: A sadly mismanaged affair. Third World Quarterly 26 (4—5), 815—830.
Wilkins, Karin and Downing, John
2002Mediating terrorism: Text and protest in interpretations of the siege. Critical Studies in Media Communication 19 (4), 419—437.
Wilson, John
1990Politically Speaking: The Pragmatic Analysis of Political Language. Oxford: Blackwell.
Winkler, Carol K
2008Encroachments on state sovereignty: The argumentation strategies of the George W. Bush administration. Argumentation 221, 473—488.
Wodak Ruth, de Cillia Rudolf, Reisigl Martin and Liebhart Karin
1999The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh University Press. Translated by Angelica Hirsch and Richard Mitten.
Wodak, Ruth. and Meyer, Michael
(eds2001Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.
Wodak, Ruth
2009The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Woods, John
1998File of fallacies: Argumentum ad baculum. Argumentation 121, 493—504.
Wright, Walter
2000Historical analogies, slippery slopes, and the question of euthanasia. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 281: 176—186.
Yaphe, Judith S
2005Bush policy and the (de)stabilization of the Persian Gulf. In: Louis J. Cantori and Augustus Richard Norton. (eds). Evaluating the Bush Menu for Change in the Middle East. A roundtable of the conference group at the American Political Science Association Annual meeting, Chicago, Sep.5th, 2004 Middle East Policy XII (1), 108—110.
Zhang, Juyan
2007Beyond anti-terrorism: Metaphors as message strategy of post-September -11 U.S. public diplomacy. Public Relations Review 33 (1), 31—39.
Cited by
Cited by 7 other publications
Blassnig, Sina, Florin Büchel, Nicole Ernst & Sven Engesser
2019. Populism and Informal Fallacies: An Analysis of Right-Wing Populist Rhetoric in Election Campaigns. Argumentation 33:1 ► pp. 107 ff.
2012. Argumentation and Fallacy in the Justification of the 2003 War on Iraq. Argumentation 26:4 ► pp. 459 ff.
Sahlane, Ahmed
2013. Metaphor as rhetoric: newspaper Op/Ed debate of the prelude to the 2003 Iraq War. Critical Discourse Studies 10:2 ► pp. 154 ff.
Sahlane, Ahmed
2015. Dialectics of argument and rhetoric: Protesting the Iraq War in US–British opinion press. Discourse & Society 26:6 ► pp. 754 ff.
Sahlane, Ahmed
2022. Covering the War on Iraq. In Discourse, Media, and Conflict, ► pp. 93 ff.
Sahlane, Ahmed
2023. (En)Countering the ‘White’ Gaze: Native-Speakerist Rhetorics and the Raciolinguistics of Hegemony. In English as an International Language Education [English Language Education, 33], ► pp. 83 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.