Article published In:
Journal of Language and PoliticsVol. 11:1 (2012) ► pp.31–50
Critique and argumentation
On the relation between the discourse-historical approach and pragma-dialectics
At the core of critical discourse analysis lies its emancipatory agenda: arguing for social equality and against discrimination. In the case of the discourse-historical approach (DHA), this stance has been theoretically justified mainly through references to Habermas’ language-philosophy. At the same time, the analysis of actually occurring argumentative speech requires more than a theoretical underpinning of one’s critique and, here, DHA has benefitted from drawing on van Eemeren and Grootendorst’s Pragma-Dialectical argumentation theory. However, Pragma-Dialectics is not just a tool kit but rests on Popper and Albert’s critical rationalism. This results in both epistemological as well as normative conflicts at the paradigm-core of DHA between critical rationalism and Habermas’ critical theory regarding the concept of critique. In this article, we review the different epistemological and normative underpinnings of DHA and Pragma-Dialectics and discuss the consequences of implementing the latter in the former. We conclude by arguing for a coherent orientation towards Habermas’ language-philosophy in order to maintain a high degree of consistency in DHA.
References
Adorno, Theodor W
1976 The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology. London: Heinemann.
Albert, Hans
1968 Traktat über kritische Vernunft. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.
Alexy, Robert
2010 A Theory of Legal Argumentation: The Theory of Rational Discourse as Theory of Legal Justification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Apel, Karl-Otto
1980 The a priori of the communication community and the foundation of ethics: the problem of a rational foundation of ethics in the scientific age. In: Towards a Transformation of Philosophy. London/Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 225—300.
Austin, John L
1975 How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 
Biro, John and Siegel, Harvey
2006 Pragma-Dialectics versus epistemological theories of arguing and arguments: rivals or partners. In: Peter Houtlosser and Agnes van Rees (eds). Considering Pragma-Dialectics. A Festschrift for Frans H. Eemeren on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday. Mahwahl/New Jersey/London: Lawrence Erlbaum Association, 1—10.
Blair, Anthony J
2006 Pragma-Dialectics and pragma-dialectics. In: Peter Houtlosser and Agnes van Rees (eds). Considering Pragma-Dialectics. A Festschrift for Frans H. Eemeren on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday. Mahwahl/New Jersey/London: Lawrence Erlbaum Association, 11—22.
Corvi, Roberta
1997 An Introduction to the Thought of Karl Popper. London: Routledge.
Fairclough, Norman and Wodak, Ruth
1997 Critical Discourse Analysis. In: Teun A. van Dijk (ed.). Discourse as Social Interaction. London: Sage, 258—284.
Forchtner, Bernhard
2011 Critique, the discourse-historical approach, and the Frankfurt School. Critical Discourse Studies 8 (1), 1—14.
Garssen, Bart and van Laar, Jan Albert
2010 A Pragma-Dialectical response to objectivist epistemic challenges. Informal Logic 30 (2), 122—141.
Habermas, Jürgen
1972 Wahrheitstheorien. In: 1984. Vorstudien und Ergänzungen zur Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp, 127—183.
1976 What is universal pragmatics? In: 1979. Communication and the Evolution of Society. London: Heinemann, 1—68.
1983 Discourse ethics: notes on a program of philosophical justification. In: 1990. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge: MIT Press, 43—115.
1984 The Theory of Communicative Action. Volume I. Reason and the Rationalization of Society. London: Heinemann.
1991 Remarks on discourse ethics. In: 1993. Justification and Application. Remarks on Discourse Ethics. Cambridge: MIT Press, 19—111.
1997 Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
1998 Hermeneutic and analytic philosophy: two complementary versions of the linguistic turn. In: 2005. Truth and Justification. Cambridge: MIT Press, 51—81.
2008 Communicative reason and the detranscendentalized “Use of Reason”. In: Between Naturalism and Religion. Cambridge: Polity Press. 24—76.
Hacohen, Malachi Haim
2002 Karl Popper. The Formative years, 1902—1945. Politics and Philosophy in Interwar Vienna. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Popper, Karl
1962a The Open Society and Its Enemies. Volume I. London: Routledge
1962b The Open Society and Its Enemies. Volume II1. London: Routledge.
2008 Conjectures and Refutations. The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London/New York: Routledge.
Rehg, William
2001 Adjusting the pragmatic turn: ethnomethodology and critical argumentation theory. In: William Rehg and James Bohman (eds). Pluralism and the Pragmatic Turn. The Transformation of Critical Theory. Essays in Honour of Thomas McCarthy. Cambridge: MIT Press, 115—143.
Reisigl, Martin and Wodak, Ruth
2001 Discourse and Discrimination. Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.
2009 The discourse-historical approach. In: Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer (eds). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage, 87—121.
Siegel, Harvey and Biro, John
2008 Rationality, reasonabless, and critical rationalism: problems with the pragma-dialectical view. Argumentation 221, 191—203.
Tomasello, Michael
2010 Origins of Human Communication. Cambridge: MIT Press.
van Dijk, Teun A
2008 Critical Discourse Analysis and nominalization. Discourse & Society 19 (6), 821—828.
van Eemeren, Frans H
2010 Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
van Eemeren, Frans H. and Grootendorst, Rob
1988 Rationale for a pragma-dialectical perspective. Argumentation 2 (2), 271—291.
1992 Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. London: Routledge.
1994 Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions. A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion. Dordrecht/Cinnaminson: Foris Publications.
2004 A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Garssen, Bart and Meuffels, Bert
2009 Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness: Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules. Dordrecht/Heidelberg/London/New York: Springer.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Grootendorst, Rob and Snoeck Henkemans, Francisca A
2002 Argumentation. Analysis, evaluation, presentation. Mahwah/New York/London: Lawrence Erlbaum Association.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Grootendorst, Rob, Jackson, Sally and Jacobs, Scott
1993 Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse. The University of Alabama Press.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig
1968 Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wodak, Ruth and Meyer, Michael
2009 Critical discourse analysis. History, agenda, theory and methodology. In: Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer (eds). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage, 1—33.
Wodak, Ruth
1996 Disorders of Discourse. London: Longman.
2001 What CDA is about — a summary of its history, important concepts and its developments. In: Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer (eds). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London. Sage, 1—13.
Cited by
Cited by 29 other publications
Agbozo, G. Edzordzi, Mary Edward & Fatiatu Inusah
2019. “Onaapo” vs. “One Factory”. In Music and Messaging in the African Political Arena [Advances in Religious and Cultural Studies, ], ► pp. 221 ff. 
Efe, Ibrahim & Bernhard Forchtner
Eranfeno, Gizachew Nemomsa, Agaredech Jemaneh Gemeda & Abdissa Zerai Bamano
2024. News discourses threatening multiculturalism in Ethiopian mainstream TV channels: Discourse historical approach. Heliyon 10:4 ► pp. e25641 ff.
Forchtner, Bernhard, Michał Krzyżanowski & Ruth Wodak
2013. Mediatization, Right-Wing Populism and Political Campaigning: The Case of the Austrian Freedom Party. In Media Talk and Political Elections in Europe and America, ► pp. 205 ff.
Forchtner, Bernhard & Christoffer Kølvraa
2012. Narrating a ‘new Europe’: From ‘bitter past’ to self-righteousness?. Discourse & Society 23:4 ► pp. 377 ff.
Forchtner, Bernhard & Christian Schneickert
2016. Collective learning in social fields: Bourdieu, Habermas and critical discourse studies. Discourse & Society 27:3 ► pp. 293 ff.
Gachigua, Sammy Gakero
2016. Legislating for a De Jure One-Party State in 1982 and “Party Hopping” in 2012. In Political Discourse in Emergent, Fragile, and Failed Democracies [Advances in Electronic Government, Digital Divide, and Regional Development, ], ► pp. 286 ff.
Hansson, Sten
2015. Discursive strategies of blame avoidance in government: A framework for analysis. Discourse & Society 26:3 ► pp. 297 ff.
Herzog, Benno
2016. Discourse analysis as immanent critique: Possibilities and limits of normative critique in empirical discourse studies. Discourse & Society 27:3 ► pp. 278 ff.
Herzog, Benno
2016. Theoretical Approaches to Critique. In Discourse Analysis as Social Critique, ► pp. 1 ff.
Krzyżanowski, Michał
2016. Recontextualisation of neoliberalism and the increasingly conceptual nature of discourse: Challenges for critical discourse studies. Discourse & Society 27:3 ► pp. 308 ff.
Krzyżanowski, Michał & Bernhard Forchtner
2016. Theories and concepts in critical discourse studies: Facing challenges, moving beyond foundations. Discourse & Society 27:3 ► pp. 253 ff.
Kutter, Amelie
2020. Advancing the Linguistic Turn: Premises of Conceptual Work. In Legitimation in the European Union, ► pp. 35 ff.
Macgilchrist, Felicitas
2016. Fissures in the discourse-scape: Critique, rationality and validity in post-foundational approaches to CDS. Discourse & Society 27:3 ► pp. 262 ff.
Põiklik, Pille
Rheindorf, Markus
2019. Introduction. In Revisiting the Toolbox of Discourse Studies, ► pp. 1 ff.
Roderick, Ian
2018. Multimodal critical discourse analysis as ethical praxis. Critical Discourse Studies 15:2 ► pp. 154 ff.
Salahshour, Neda & Dimitris Serafis
2022. (De-)constructing New Zealand PM Jacinda Ardern’s initiative to wear the hijab after the Christchurch terrorist attack. Journal of Argumentation in Context 11:2 ► pp. 157 ff.
Serafis, Dimitris
2022. Unveiling the rationale of soft hate speech in multimodal artefacts. Journal of Language and Discrimination
Serafis, Dimitris, E. Dimitris Kitis & Stavros Assimakopoulos
Serafis, Dimitris & Assimakis Tseronis
2023. The front page as a canvas for multimodal argumentation: Brexit in the Greek press. Frontiers in Communication 8
Serafis, Dimitris, Franco Zappettini & Stavros Assimakopoulos
2023. The Institutionalization of Hatred Politics in the Mediterranean: Studying Corpora of Online News Portals During the European ‘Refugee Crisis’. Topoi 42:2 ► pp. 651 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2013. Research in Related Disciplines and Non-Anglophone Areas. In Handbook of Argumentation Theory, ► pp. 1 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2014. Research in Related Disciplines and Non-Anglophone Areas. In Handbook of Argumentation Theory, ► pp. 677 ff.
Wang, Jiayu & Mingfeng Yang
2023. Interpersonal-function topoi in Chinese central government’s work report (2020) as epidemic (counter-)crisis discourse. Journal of Language and Politics 22:2 ► pp. 185 ff.
Wodak, Ruth
Wodak, Ruth & Bernhard Forchtner
2014. Embattled Vienna 1683/2010: right-wing populism, collective memory and the fictionalisation of politics. Visual Communication 13:2 ► pp. 231 ff.
Zienkowski, Jan
2017. Discourse Theory on the Logics of Articulation, Politics and Subjectivity. In Articulations of Self and Politics in Activist Discourse, ► pp. 35 ff.
Zienkowski, Jan
2017. Reflexivity in the transdisciplinary field of critical discourse studies. Palgrave Communications 3:1
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.