Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 11:3 (2012) ► pp.382–404

Not just any order!

Revealing identity constructions of Muslims in the Mohammad cartoons

The article analyses how the Mohammad cartoons enforced stereotypes of Muslims. It provides in-depth analysis of the cartoons based on opinion material from public debate and cognitive discourse analysis of “common sense knowledge”. The article shows that the main themes of interpretation were Muslim male and female identities. These were presented in a stereotypical way, downplaying agency and critical reflection among Muslim believers. Moreover, many citizens pointed out similarities between the Abrahamic religions. Such interpretations may be traced to mental models that perceived the cartoons as either humorous, a matter of Freedom of speech, or as an expression of values supportive to multiculturalism. Thereby the public debate drew on discourses about terrorism, veiling, child marriages, mother tongue education, and Turkey’s possible EU-accession. In general, the cartoons as well as the public debate about them enforced new racist ideas of Muslims.

Keywords: terror, Islam, Mohammad, caricature, racism
Published online: 26 November 2012
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.11.3.04joe
References
Alhassan, Amin
2008 “The Twelve Cartoons. A Discursive Inquiry.” In Transnational Media Events, ed. by Eide Kunelius and Phillips. Gothenburg: Nordicom.Google Scholar
Andreassen, Rikke
2005 Gender, Race, Sexuality and Nationality. Ph.D. dissertation. Toronto: University of Toronto.
Chilton, Paul
2005 “Missing Links in Mainstream CDA: Modules, Blends and the Critical Instinct.” In A New Research Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis. Theory and Interdisciplinarity, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Paul Chilton, 19—52. Philadelphia: John Benjamin’s Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chouliaraki, Lilie
2004 “Watching September 11: The Politics of Pity.” Discourse & Society 15 (2): 185—198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dansk Oplagsbulletin
[Bulletin of the Danish Audit Bureau of Circulations] 2005.
van Dijk, Teun A
2000 “Ideologies, Racism, Discourse: Debates on Immigration and Ethnic Issues.” In Comparative Perspectives on Racism, ed. by ter Wal and Verkuyten, 91—116. London: Ashgate Pub Ltd.Google Scholar
2005 “Contextual Knowledge Management in Discourse Production.” In A New Research Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis. Theory and Interdisciplinarity, ed. by Wodak and Chilton, 71—100. Philadelphia: John Benjamin’s Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Discourse and Context. A Socio-Cognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eriksen, Jens-Martin, and Frederik Stjernfelt
2008 Adskillelsens politik. Multikulturalisme —ideologi og virkelighed. Copenhagen: Lindhardt & Ringhof. Ethnicities, ed. by Lindekilde, Lasse E, Mouritsen, Per and Zapato-Barrero, Ricard. Vol. 91, no. 3.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark Turner
2002 The Way we Think. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gad, Ulrik Pram
2010 (How) can They Become Like Us? Danish Identity Politics and the Conflict of Muslim Relations. Ph.D. dissertation. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen.
Hansen, Lene
2011 “Theorizing the Image for Security Studies: Visual Securitization and the Muhammad Cartoon Crisis.” European Journal of International Relations 17 (1): 51—74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hart, Christopher
2010 Critical Discourse Analysis and the Cognitive Sciences. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hervik, Peter
2002 Mediernes muslimer. Copenhagen: Nævnet for etnisk ligestilling.Google Scholar
2011 The Annoying Difference. New York: Berghahn Publishers.Google Scholar
Holly, Werner
2008 “Tabloidisation of Political Communication in the Public Sphere.” In Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Veronika Koller, 317—341. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hussain, Mustafa
2003 “Media Representation of Ethnicity and the Institutional Discourse.” In Medierne, minoriteterne og det multikulturelle samfund. Skandinaviske perspektiver, ed. by Tufte, 115—132. Göteborg: Nordicom.Google Scholar
2007 “La controvèrsia de les vinyetes de Mahoma els mitjans de comunicaciao a Dinamarca.” Quaderns del CAC 271: 47—58.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, Brian
2008 Religion som fremmedhed i dansk politik. En sammenligning af italesættelser af jøder i Rigsdagstidende 1903—45 og muslimer i Folketingstidende 1967—2005. Ph.D. dissertation. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen.
Jerichow, Anders, and Mille Rode
2006 Profet-affæren. Copenhagen: Danish PEN.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, Signe Kjær
2010 “Interviewet og hvad så? En kritisk analyse af Asmaa AbdolHamids betingelser for selvfremstilling.” Tidsskrift for islamforskning 4 (2): 77—103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klausen, Jytte
2009 The Cartoons that Shook the World. New Haven: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kruglanski, Arie W., and Donna E. Webster
1996 “Motivated Closing of the Mind: “seizing” and “freezing”. Psychological Review 103 (2): 263—283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kunelius, Risto
(ed 2007 Reading the Mohammed Cartoons Controversy. Bochum: Projekt Verlag.Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo
2000 “Visual Racism.” In The Semiotics of Racism, ed. by Martin Reisigl and Ruth Wodak, 333—350.Vienna: Passagen Verlag.Google Scholar
2008 Discourse and Practise. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindekilde, Lasse E
2008 Contested Caricatures: Dynamics of Muslim Claims-makingduring the Muhammad Caricatures Controversy. Ph.D. dissertation. Florence: European University Institute.
Lund, Anker Brink, Nielsen, Anders Hvass, and Sys Vestergaard
2002 Etniske minoriteter i dansk journalistik. Working paper, Department for Journalism, University of Southern Denmark. (unpublished)
Lægaard, Sune
2009 “Normative Interpretations of Diversity: The Danish Cartoons Controversy and the Importance of Context.” Ethnicities 9 (3): 314—333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mead, George Herbert
1962 Mind, Self and Society. Chicago and London: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Müller, Marion G., and Esra Özcan
2007 “The Political Iconography of Muhammad Cartoons: Understanding Cultural Conflict and Political Action.” PS Political Studies 401: 287—291.Google Scholar
Oehlenschläger, Adam
1965 Aladdin eller den forunderlige lampe. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
Pickering, Michael
2001 Stereotyping. The Politics of Representation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rothstein, Klaus, and Mikael Rothstein
2006 Bomben i turbanen. Espergærde: Tiderne Skifter.Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
2001 Discourse and Discrimination. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Garbi
2007 Muslim i Danmark — muslim i verden. Uppsala, Uppsala Universitetstryckeriet.Google Scholar
Stage, Carsten
2009 Et andet Danmark. Konstruktionen af national identitet under tegningekrisen. Ph.D. dissertation. Aarhus: University of Aarhus.
Stjernfelt, Frederik
2006 “Den dobbelte metonymi: Muhammed og Fogh karikeret -en komparativ analyse. ” Kritik 38 (179): 42—52.Google Scholar
Yilmaz, Ferruh
2006 Ethnicized Ontologies. From Foreign Worker to Muslim Immigrant. Ph.D. Dissertation. San Diego, California: University of California.
Warburg, Margit, and
others 2009 Rapport om brugen af niqab og burka. Department for Cross Cultural and Regional Studies, University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Theo van Leeuwen
1999 “Legitimizing Immigrant Control: A Discourse-Historical Analysis.” Discourse Studies 1 (1): 83—118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and John E. Richardson
2009 “The Impact of Visual Racism. Visual Arguments in Political Leaflets of Austrian and British Far-right Parties. Controversia 6 (2): 45—77.Google Scholar