This article focuses on the discourses of the main centre-right political party group (EPP-ED, EPP) in the European Parliament on Turkey’s accession to the European Union. It utilises the analytical framework of the Discourse-Historical Approach in Critical Discourse Analysis to mainly concentrate on the articulations of ‘culture’ and ‘cultural identity’ in the discussions over Turkish accession in official parliamentary debates and in-depth personal interviews with the members of this group. It is argued that a relational theorising of identity allows for analysis of the ways in which a cultural ‘Europe’ is articulated through current discussions on Turkey in the mainstream right-wing European Parliament discourse and thus reveals the cultural borders that are enacted with reference to Turkish membership within this group.
2009 “The Prospect of Turkey’s EU Membership as Represented in the British Newspapers The Times and The Guardian, 2002–2005.” Journal of European Studies 39 (4): 469–506.
Alonso, Ana M
1988 “The Effects of Truth: Re-presentations of the Past and the Imagining of Community.” Journal of Historical Sociology 1 (1): 33–57.
Anderson, Benedict
1983Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso Books.
Asad, Talal
1999 “Religion, Nation-State, Secularism.” In Nation and Religion: Perspectives on Europe and Asia, ed. by Peter Van der Veer, and Hartmut Lehmann, 178–197. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Asad, Talal
2003Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Aydın-Düzgit, Senem
2012Constructions of European Identity: Debates and Discourses on Turkey and the EU. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Barker, Martin
1981The New Racism. London: Junction Books.
Bottici, Chiara, and Benoit Challand
2011The Myth of the Clash of Civilizations. New York: Routledge.
Bowden, Brett
2007 “The Ideal of Civilisation: Its Origins and Socio-Political Character.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 7 (1): 25–50.
Butler, Judith
1993Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’. New York and London: Routledge.
Campbell, David
1992Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Campbell, David
1998National Deconstruction: Violence, Identity, and Justice in Bosnia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Connolly, William E
1989 “Identity and Difference in Global Politics.” In International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics, ed. by James Der Derian, and Michael J. Shapiro, 323–342. New York: Lexington.
Davison, Andrew
1998Secularism and Revivalism in Turkey: A Hermeneutic Reconsideration. New Haven: Yale University Press.
1993Presidency Conclusions, Copenhagen European Council 21–22 June 1993, SN 180/1/93.
European Council
2002Presidency Conclusions, Copenhagen European Council 12–13 December 2002, SN 400/02.
European Council
2005 “Negotiating Framework for Turkey.” Luxembourg3October 2005, available at [URL]
Fabian, Johannes
1983Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes Its Object. New York: Columbia University Press.
Giannakopoulos, Angelos, and Konstandinos Maras
2005 “Party Perspectives in the European Parliament on Turkey’s EU accession: An Empirical Study of Session Protocols of the European Parliament 1996–2004.” Occasional Paper No. 4/05 of the South East European Studies at Oxford (SEEOX), Oxford: European Studies Centre, St Antony’s College.
Hall, Stuart
1992 “The West and the Rest: Discourse and Power.” In Formations of Modernity, ed. by Stuart Hall, and Bram Gieben, 275–320. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hall, Stuart
1996 “The Question of Cultural Identity.” In Modernity: An Introduction to Modern Societies, ed. by Stuart Hall, Don Hubert, David Held, and Kenneth Thompson, 595–635. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Hansen, Lene
2006Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War. London: Routledge.
Herzfeld, Michael
2002 “The European Self: Rethinking an Attitude.” In The Idea of Europe: From Antiquity to the European Union, ed. by Anthony Pagden, 139–171. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huntington, Samuel
1996The Clash of Civilisations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Huysseune, Michel
2006Modernity and Secession: The Social Sciences and the Political Discourse of the Lega Nord in Italy. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books.
Judge, David, and David Earnshaw
2003The European Parliament. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Kaya, Ayhan
2012Islam, Migration and Integration: The Age of Securitization. London: Palgrave.
Krasner, Stephen D
1993 “Westphalia and All That.” In Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions and Political Change, ed. by Judith Goldstein, and Robert O. Keohane, 235–264. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Krzyzanowski, Michal
2010The Discursive Construction of European Identities: A Multilevel Approach to Discourse and Identity in the Transforming European Union. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Krzyzanowski, Michal, Anna Triandafyllidou, and Ruth Wodak
(eds)2009The European Public Sphere and the Media: Europe in Crisis. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Krzyzanowski, Michal, and Florian Oberhuber
2007(Un)doing Europe: Discourse and Practices in Negotiating the EU Constitution. Brussels: P.I.E.-Peter Lang.
Levin, Paul T
2011Turkey and the European Union: Christian and Secular Images of Islam. New York: Palgrave.
Lewis, Bernard
2002What Went Wrong? Western Impact and Middle Eastern Response. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Moisi, Dominique
1999 “Dreaming of Europe.” Foreign Policy 1151: 44–59.
Negrine, Ralph, Beybin Kejanlioglu, Rabah Aissaoui, and Stelios Papathanassopoulos
2008 “Turkey and the European Union: An Analysis of How the Press in Four Countries Covered Turkey’s Bid for Accession in 2004.” European Journal of Communication 23 (1): 47–68.
Neumann, Iver
1999Uses of the Other: The East in European Identity Formation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Neumann, Iver
2004 “Deep Structure, Free-floating Signifier, or Something in Between? Europe’s Alterity in Putin’s Russia.” In Identity and Global Politics: Empirical and Theoretical Elaborations, ed. by Patricia M. Goff, and Kevin C. Dunn, 9–26. London: Palgrave.
Norton, Anne
1987Reflections on Political Identity. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Pace, Michelle
2006The Politics of Regional Identity: Meddling with the Mediterranean. London: Routledge.
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
2001Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Anti-Semitism. London and New York: Routledge.
Ruiz-Jimenez, Antonia, and Jose I. Torreblanca
2007 “European Public Opinion and Turkey’s Accession: Making Sense of Arguments For and Against.”
EPIN Working Paper, No. 16, Centre for European Policy Studies: Brussels.
Said, Edward
1978Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books.
Shakman Hurd, Elizabeth
2006 “Negotiating Europe: The Politics of Religion and the Prospects for Turkish Accession.” Review of International Studies 321: 401–418.
Suvarierol, Semin, and Senem Aydın-Düzgit
2011 “Limits of Cosmopolitanism: European Commission Officials on the Selves and Others.” Alternatives 36 (2): 155–168.
Tekin, Beyza Ç
2010Representations and Othering in Discourse: The Construction of Turkey in the EU Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Titscher, Stefan, Michael Meyer, Ruth Wodak, and Eva Vetter
2000Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.
Tocci, Nathalie
(ed)2007Conditionality, Impact and Prejudice in EU-Turkey Relations. Rome: Istituto Affari Internazionali.
Van Dijk, Teun A
1993Elite Discourse and Racism. London: Sage.
Weldes, Jutta, Mark Laffey, Hugh Gusterson, and Raymond Duvall
1999Cultures of Insecurity: States, Communities, and the Production of Danger. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
White, Hayden
2000 “The Discourse of Europe and the Search for a European Identity.” In Europe and the Other, Europe as the Other, ed. by Bo Strath, 67–86. Brussels: P.I.E.-Peter Lang.
Wodak, Ruth
2001 “The Discourse-Historical Approach.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer. London: Sage.
Wodak, Ruth
2007 “Afterword: ‘What Now?′- Some Reflections on the European Convention and Its Implications.” In (Un)Doing Europe: Discourse and Practices in Negotiating the EU Constitution, ed. by Michal Krzyzanowski, and Florian Oberhuber. Brussels: P.I.E-Peter Lang.
Wodak, Ruth
2009The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf de Cillia, Martin Reisigl, Karin Liebhart, Angelika Hirsch, and Richard Mitten
2009The Discursive Construction of National Identity (2nd edn). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Yılmaz, Gözde
2012 “Exploring the Implementation of Minority Protection Rules in the ‘Worlds of Compliance’: The Case of Turkey.” Perspectives on European Politics and Society 13 (4): 408–424.
Yılmaz, Hakan
2007 “Turkish Identity on the Road to the EU: Basic Elements of French and German Oppositional Discourses.” Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans 9 (3): 293–305.
Cited by
Cited by 6 other publications
Buhari-Gulmez, Didem & Seckin Baris Gulmez
2022. Theorizing many Europes: a four-fold taxonomy. European Politics and Society 23:1 ► pp. 8 ff.
Economides, Spyros, Kevin Featherstone & Tom Hunter
2024. The Changing Discourses of EU Enlargement: A Longitudinal Analysis of National Parliamentary Debates. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 62:1 ► pp. 168 ff.
Gulmez, Seckin Baris, Alp Eren Topal & Bahar Rumelili
2023. Europe and Turkey: identities in evolution. An analytical literature review. Open Research Europe 3 ► pp. 120 ff.
Gürkan, Seda
2018. The role of the European Parliament in Turkey-EU relations: A troublemaker or a useful normative actor?. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 18:1 ► pp. 107 ff.
Kaeding, Michael & Felix Schenuit
2021. The European Parliament’s Perspective on EU–Turkey Relations. In EU-Turkey Relations, ► pp. 241 ff.
Türkeş-Kılıç, Selin
2020. Justifying privileged partnership with Turkey: an analysis of debates in the European Parliament. Turkish Studies 21:1 ► pp. 29 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.