By looking at both apologies made in everyday conversation and those made by politicians in public, I aim in this paper to provide a full set of felicity conditions for the speech act of apology. I also discuss how refinements to previously proposed categories of apology strategies are needed to accurately describe how (British) politicians apologise. I endeavour to show that with these refinements, the speech act approach to apologies is applicable to those of a political nature, as well as those in everyday conversation. Using these developments I analyse how Members of the U.K. Parliament apologise for a variety of offences. This analysis shows that MPs make more fulsome apologies than the apologies found in everyday conversation. The type of offence has an effect on how an MP apologises, with apologies for financial irregularities being the more detailed and making use of more conventional strategies than other apologies.
Augustinos, Martha, Brianne Hastie, and Monique Wright. 2011. “Apologizing for Historical Injustice: Emotion, Truth and Identity in Political Discourse.” Discourse & Society 221: 507–531.
Bergman, Marc, and Gabriele Kasper. 1993. “Perception and Performance in Native and Non-native Apologizing.” In Interlanguage Pragmatics, ed. by Gabriele Kasper, and Shoshana Blum-Kulka, 82–107. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Blatz, Craig, Karina Schumann, and Michael Ross. 2009. “Government Apologies for Historical Injustices.” Political Psychology 301: 219–241.
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, and Elite Olshtain. 1984. “Requests and Apologies: A Cross-cultural Study of Speech Act Realization Patterns (CCSARP).” Applied Linguistics 51: 196–213.
Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
Cohen, Andrew, and Elite Olshtain. 1981. “Developing a Measure of Sociocultural Competence: The Case of Apology.” Language Learning 311: 113–134.
Coulmas, Florian. 1981. “‘Poison to Your Soul’: Thanks and Apologies Contrastively Reviewed.”In Conversational Routine, ed. by Florian Coulmas, 69–91. The Hague: Mouton.
Deutschmann, Mats. 2003. Apologising in British English. Umeå: Umeå Universitet.
Flynn, Paul. 2012. How to be an MP. London: Biteback.
Fraser, Bruce. 1981. “On Apologizing.” In Conversational Routine, ed. by Florian Coulmas, 259–273. The Hague: Mouton.
Gastil, John. 1992. “Undemocratic Discourse: A Review of Theory and Research on Political Discourse.” Discourse & Society 31: 469–500.
Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard. 2008. “On the Availability of ‘Literal’ Meaning: Evidence from Courtroom Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 401: 1392–1410.
Harris, Sandra, Karen Grainger, and Louise Mullany. 2006. “The Pragmatics of Political Apologies.” Discourse & Society 171: 715–737.
Holmes, Janet. 1989. “Sex Differences and Apologies: One Aspect of Communicative Competence.” Applied Linguistics 101: 194–213.
Holmes, Janet. 1990. “Apologies in New Zealand English.” Language in Society 191: 155–199.
House of Commons Information Office. 2012. Briefing Note: Apologies Made to the House of Commons Since 1979. SN03169. London: House of Commons Library.
Ilie, Cornelia. 2010. “Strategic Uses of Parliamentary Forms of Address: The Case of the U.K. Parliament and the Swedish Riksdag.” Journal of Pragmatics 421: 885–911.
Kampf, Zohar. 2009. “Public (non-)apologies: The Discourse of Minimizing Responsibility.” Journal of Pragmatics 411: 2257–2270.
Levinson, Stephen. 1988. “Putting Linguistics on a Proper Footing: Explorations in Goffman's Participation Framework.” In Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order, ed. by Paul Drew, and Antony Wootton, 161–227. Oxford: Polity Press.
Levinson, Stephen. 1995. “Three Levels of Meaning.” In Grammar and Meaning: Essays in Honour of Sir John Lyons, ed. by Frank Palmer, 90–115. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lind, Jennifer. 2008. Sorry States: Apologies in International Politics. Ithica, NY: Cornell University Press.
Meier, Ardith. 1992. A Sociopragmatic Contrastive Study of Repair Work in Austrian German and American English. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Vienna, Austria.
Olshtain, Elite. 1989. “Apologies across Languages.” In Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies, ed. by Shoshana Blum-Kulka, Juliane House, and Gabriele Kasper, 155–173. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Owen, Marion. 1983. Apologies and Remedial Interchanges: A Study of Language Use in Social Interaction. The Hague: Mouton.
Rice, Condoleezza. 2011. No Higher Honor: A Memoir of My Time in Washington. New York: Random House.
Robinson, Jeffrey. 2004. “The Sequential Organization of ‘Explicit’ Apologies in Naturally Occurring English.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 371: 291–330.
Searle, John. 1975. “Indirect Speech Acts.” In Syntax and Semantics Vol. 3: Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole, and Jerry Morgan, 59–82. London: Academic Press.
Searle, John, and Daniel Vanderveken. 1985. Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Suszcyńska, Małgorzata. 1999. “Apologizing in English, Polish and Hungarian: Different Languages, Different Strategies.” Journal of Pragmatics 311: 1053–1065.
Tavuchis, Nicholas. 1991. Mea Culpa: A Sociology of Apology and Reconciliation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Trosborg, Anna. 1987. “Apology Strategies in Native/non-natives.” Journal of Pragmatics 111: 147–167.
Trosborg, Anna. 1994. Interlanguage Pragmatics: Requests, Complaints, and Apologies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Turnbull, William. 2003. Language in Action: Psychological Models of Conversation. Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press.
Wachtel, Tom. 1980. “Going through the Motions.” Journal of Linguistics 161: 85–88.
Cited by (28)
Cited by 28 other publications
Aatar, M’hand, Hassan Skouri & Lalla Asmae Karama
2024. Apology strategies in Tashelhit: linguistic realization and religious influence. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 20:1 ► pp. 203 ff.
David, Roman & Pui Chuen Tam
2024. Political apologies and their acceptance: Experimental evidence from victims and perpetrators nations. British Journal of Social Psychology 63:1 ► pp. 273 ff.
Friskney, Ruth
2024. How the police (over)use explicit apology language to manage aspects of their identity. Journal of Politeness Research 20:2 ► pp. 373 ff.
Abdelhady, Saleem & Marwa Alkinj
2023. A pragmatic analysis of ostensible lies in high-context cultures. Cogent Arts & Humanities 10:1
Hao, Haihong & Tingting Yang
2023. The Speech Act of Apology by Lenovo on Facebook. International Journal of Education and Humanities 9:3 ► pp. 207 ff.
Thaler, Marion & Christine Elsweiler
2023. The Role of Gender in the Realisation of Apologies in Local Council Meetings: A Variational Pragmatic Approach in British and New Zealand English. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 71:3 ► pp. 217 ff.
Yeung, Victoria Wai Lan & Roman David
2023. Apology mismatch: An experimental approach to Japan's apologies to Korea. Asian Journal of Social Psychology 26:3 ► pp. 301 ff.
Anane, Job
2022. A Pragmatic Study of Apology Strategies in Akan (Twi). South Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 3:6 ► pp. 38 ff.
ATAKOĞLU, Büşra
2022. II. DÜNYA SAVAŞI SAVAŞ ÖZÜRLERİNDE TARİHSEL DEĞİŞİM: JAPONYA ÖRNEĞİ. Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute
Boehme, Franziska
2022. Normative Expectations and the Colonial Past: Apologies and Art Restitution to Former Colonies in France and Germany. Global Studies Quarterly 2:4
Navera, Jocelyn A. S. & Leah Gustilo
2022. Knowledge types and presuppositions. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 32:2 ► pp. 274 ff.
Rieger, Caroline L.
2022. “I want a real apology”. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)► pp. 553 ff.
2019. I'm sorry you are such an arsehole: (non-)canonical apologies and their implications for (im)politeness. Journal of Pragmatics 142 ► pp. 223 ff.
Murphy, James
2019. Apologising. In The Discursive Construction of Blame, ► pp. 201 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.