“Illegal immigration” occurs at a quite small scale in the Irish context, especially when compared to other European countries. Nevertheless, there is a significant level of discussion about “illegal immigration” in the Irish Parliament. Through the conceptual frameworks of Foucauldian thought and Critical Discourse Analysis, this paper undertakes a Topoi Analysis to examine discursive representations from the Irish Parliament (2002–2009). It concentrates upon the most common argumentation forwarded by parliamentarians – the need to control “illegal immigration” in Ireland. This argumentation is expressed through various discourses. Notably, these discourses are juxtaposed with positive representations of the “undocumented Irish” in the U.S. Overall, it is argued that negative control discourses about “illegal immigrants” in Ireland provide a number of functions: (i) the legitimization and continuation of the nation-state rationale of governance, (ii) the provision of a forum for implicit expressions of racism, and (iii) the acceptance of “justified” practices of exclusion of unwanted non-EU migrants.
Bauder, Harald. 2008a. “Media Discourse and the New German Immigration Law.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 34 (1): 95-112.
Bauder, Harald. 2008b. “Neoliberalism and the Economic Utility of Immigration: Media Perspectives of Germany’s Immigration Law.” Antipode 40 (1): 55-78.
Bauder, Harald. 2008c. “Immigration debate in Canada: How newspapers reported, 1996-2004.” International Migration and Integration 91: 289-310.
Bauder, Harald. 2008d. “Dialectics of Humanitarian Immigration and National Identity in Canadian Public Discourse.” Refugee 25 (1): 84-93.
Bauder, Harald, and Jan Semmelroggen. 2009. “Immigration and Imagination of Nationhood in the German Parliament.” Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 15 (1): 1-26.
Dean, Mitchell M. 2010. Governmentality. Power and Rule in Modern Society. London: Sage.
Dolan, Paddy. 2009. “Figurational Dynamics and Parliamentary Discourses of Living Standards in Ireland.” British Journal of Sociology 60 (4): 721-739.
Every, Danielle, and Martha Augoustino. 2007. “Constructions of Racism in the Australian Parliamentary Debates on Asylum Seekers.” Discourse and Society 18 (4): 411-436.
Foucault, Michel. 1983. The History of Sexuality: The Will to Knowledge. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Foucault, Michel. 1991a. “Governmentality.” In The Foucault Effect. Studies in Governmentality, ed. by Graham Burchell, Colin Gordon, and Peter Miller, 87-104. Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Foucault, Michel. 1991b. “Politics and the Study of Discourse.” In The Foucault Effect. Studies in Governmentality, ed. by Graham Burchell, Colin Gordon, and Peter Miller, 53-72. Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Gordon, Colin. 1991. “Governmental Rationality: An Introduction.” In The Foucault effect. Studies in Governmentality, ed. by Graham Burchell, Colin Gordon, and Peter Miller, 1-51. Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Grue, Jan. 2009. “Critical Discourse Analysis, Topoi and Mystification: Disability Policy Documents from a Norwegian NGO.” Discourse Studies 11 (3): 305-328.
Guibernau, Montserrat. 2007. The Identity of Nations. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hagelund, Anniken. 2003. “A Matter of Decency? The Progress Party in Norwegian Immigration Politics.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 29 (1): 47-65.
Hall, Stuart. 2001. “Foucault: Power, Knowledge, and Discourse.” In Discourse Theory and Practice. A Reader, ed. by Margaret Wetherell, Stephanie Taylor, and Simeon Yates, Simeon, 72-81. London: Sage Publications.
Haynes, Amanda, Martin J. Power, and Eoin Devereux. 2010. How Irish Politicians Construct Transnational EU Migrants. Limerick: Doras Luimní.
Jacobs, Dirk. 1998. “Discourse, Politics and Policy: The Dutch Parliamentary Debate about Voting-rights for Foreign Residents.” International Migration Review 32 (2): 350-373.
Jacoby, William. G. 2000. “Issues Framing and Public Opinion on Government Spending.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (4): 750-767.
Jones, Lena. 2000. “Immigration and Parliamentary Discourse in Great Britain. An Analysis of the Debates Related to the 1996 Asylum and Immigration Act.” In Racism at the Top. Parliamentary Discourses on Ethnic Issues in Six European States, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Teun A. van Dijk, 283-310. Austrian Federal Ministry of Education, Science and Culture. Klagenfurt: Draca Verlag.
Kostakopoulou, Dora. 2004. “Irregular Migration and Migration Theory: Making State Authorization Less Relevant.” In Irregular Migration and Human Rights: Theoretical, European and International Perspectives, ed. By Barbara Bogisz, 41-60. NLD: Brill Academic Publishers.
Krzyżanowski, Michał, and Ruth Wodak. 2008. The Politics of Exclusion: Debating Migration in Austria. New Brunswick: Transaction Publications.
Leerkes, Arjen, Monica Varsanyi, and Godfried Engbersen. 2012. “Local Limits to Migration Control: Practices of Selective Migration Policing in a Restrictive National Policy Context.” Police Quarterly 15 (4): 446-475.
Maas, Utz. 1984. As the Spirit of Community Found in Language: Language in National Socialism. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Maas, Utz. 1989a. Language Policy and Political Science. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Maas, Utz. 1989b. “Language in National Socialism: Analysis of a Speech of Student Functionaries.” In Language in Fascism, ed. by K. Ehlich, 162-197. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Mac Éinri, Piaras, and Allen White. 2008. “Immigration into the Republic of Ireland: A Bibliography of Recent Research.” Irish Geography 41 (2): 151-179.
Mautner, Gerlinde. 2008. “Analyzing Newspapers, Magazines and Other Print Media.” In Qualitative Discourse Analysis in the Social Sciences, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Michal Krzyzanowski, 30-53. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
McLaren, Lauren M. 2001. “Immigration and the New Politics of Inclusion and Exclusion in the European Union: The Effect of Elites and the EU on Individual-level Opinions Regarding European and Non-European Immigrants.” European Journal of Political Research 391: 81-108.
Mountz, Alison. 2003. “Human Smuggling, the Transnational Imaginary, and Everyday Geographies of the Nation-State.” Antipode 351: 622-644.
Mountz, Alison. 2010. Seeking Asylum. Human Smuggling and Bureaucracy at the Border. London: University of Minnesota Press.
Naughten, Denis. Select Committee on Justice, Equality, Defense and Women’s Rights, 9October2008.
Nevins, Joseph. 2002. Operation Gatekeeper. The Rise of the “Illegal Alien” and the Making of the U.S.-Mexico boundary. Oxon: Routledge.
Quinn, Emma. 2003. European Migration Network Annual Report on Statistics on Migration, Asylum and Return: Ireland. Ireland: European Migration Network.
Quinn, Emma. 2005. Migration and Asylum in Ireland: Summary of Legislation, Case Law and Policy Measures and Directory of Organizations, Researchers and Research 2005. Ireland: European Migration Network.
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetoric’s of Racism and Anti-Semitism. London: Routledge
Rojo, Luisa M. and Teun A. van Dijk. 1997. ““There was a Problem and it was Solved”. Legitimating the Expulsion of Illegal Immigrants in Spanish Parliamentary Discourse.” Discourse and Society 8 (4): 523-567.
Ruhs, Martin. 2009. Ireland: From Rapid Immigration to Recession. Oxford University: Centre on Migration, Policy and Society.
Schain, Martin. 2008. “Why Political Parties Matter.” Journal of European Public Policy 15 (3): 465-470.
Stapleton, Karyn, and John Wilson. 2010. “Community Discourse about Politics in Northern Ireland.” Text and Talk 30 (3): 311-331.
Triandafyllidou, Anna. 2000. “The Political Discourse on Immigration in Southern Europe: A Critical Analysis.” Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 101: 373-389.
Van Der Valk, Ineke. 2003. “Right-wing Parliamentary Discourse on Immigration in France.” Discourse and Society 14 (3): 309-348.
van Dijk, Teun A. 1987. Communicating Racism. Ethnic Prejudice in Thought and Talk. Newbury Park: Sage.
van Dijk, Teun A. 1993a. “Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Discourse and Society 4 (2): 249-283.
van Dijk, Teun A. 1993b. Elite Discourse and Racism. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
van Dijk, Teun A. 1993c. “Denying Racism: Elite Discourse and Racism.” In Racism and migration in Western Europe, ed. by John Solomos and John Wrench, 179-193. Oxford: Berg.
van Dijk, Teun A. 1995. “Elite Discourse and the Reproduction of Racism.” In Hate speech, ed. by Rita Kirk Slayden and David Slayden, 1-27. Newbury Park: Sage.
van Dijk, Teun A. 1997. “Political Discourse and Racism: Describing Others in Western Parliaments.” In The Language of Politics of Exclusion: Others in Discourse. Communication and Human Values, ed. by S. Harold Riggins, vol. 241, 31-64. London: Sage.
van Dijk, Teun A. 2000a. “Theoretical Background.” In Racism at the Top. Parliamentary Discourses on Ethnic Issues in six European States, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Teun A. van Dijk, 13-30. Austrian Federal Ministry of Education, Science and Culture. Klagenfurt: Draca Verlag.
van Dijk, Teun A. 2000b. “Parliamentary Debates.” In Racism at the Top. Parliamentary Discourses on Ethnic Issues in Six European States, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Teun A. van Dijk, 45-78. Austrian Federal Ministry of Education, Science and Culture. Klagenfurt: Draca Verlag.
van Dijk, Teun A. 2009. “Critical Discourse Studies: A Sociocognitive Approach.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 62-86. London: Sage.
Wilson, John, and Karyn Stapleton. 2012. “Discourse in the Shadows: Discursive Construction and the Northern Ireland Assembly.” Discourse and Society 23 (1): 69-92.
Wodak, Ruth. 2011. The Discourse of Politics in Action. Politics as Usual. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wodak, Ruth. 2012. “Language, Power and Identity.” Journal for Language Teaching 45 (2): 215-233.
Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf De Cillia, Martin Reisigl, and Karin Liebhart. 2009. The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Wodak, Ruth, and Michal Krzyzanowski (eds). 2008. Qualitative Discourse Analysis in the Social Sciences. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer. 2009. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.
Wodak, Ruth, and Teun A. van Dijk. 2000. Racism at the Top: Parliamentary Discourses on Ethnic Issues in Six European States. Klagenfurt: Drava Verlag.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Azzi, Sabrina & Stéphane Gagnon
2023. Ontology-Driven Parliamentary Analytics: Analysing Political Debates on COVID-19 Impact in Canada. In Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 14149], ► pp. 89 ff.
Haw, Ashleigh
2022. Asylum Seekers in the Australian News Media: What Do We Know So Far?. In Asylum Seekers in Australian News Media, ► pp. 11 ff.
Peterie, Michelle & David Neil
2020. Xenophobia towards asylum seekers: A survey of social theories. Journal of Sociology 56:1 ► pp. 23 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.