References
Anderson, Benedict
1983Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Bartlett, Jamie
2014 “Populism, Social Media and Democratic Strain.” In European Populism and Winning the Immigration Debate, edited by Clara Sandelind, 99–116. Stockholm: Fores.Google Scholar
Casero-Ripollés, Andreu, Ramón A. Feenstra, and Simon Tormey
2016 “Old and New Media Logics in an Electoral Campaign: The Case of Podemos and the Two-Way Street Mediatization of Politics.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 21 (3): 378–97. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Engesser, Sven, Nicole Ernst, Frank Esser, and Florin Büchel
2016 “Populism and Social Media: How Politicians Spread a Fragmented Ideology.” Information, Communication & Society, 1–18. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Enli, Gunn
2017 “Twitter as Arena for the Authentic Outsider: Exploring the Social Media Campaigns of Trump and Clinton in the 2016 US Presidential Election.” European Journal of Communication 32 (1): 50–61. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Gimenez, Elsa, and Natalie Schwarz
2016 “The Visual Construction of ‘the People’ and ‘proximity to the People’ on the Online Platforms of the National Front and Swiss People’s Party.” Österreichische Zeitschrift Für Soziologie 41 (2): 213–42. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Gladstone, Brooke
2017A Taxonomy of Trump Tweets. WNYC’s On the Media. Accessed March 22. [URL].
Greenwood, Shannon, Andrew Perrin, and Maeve Duggan
2016 “Social Media Update 2016.” [URL]. November 11. [URL].
Keith, Tamara
2016 “President-Elect Trump Breaks With Long History Of Press Conferences.” NPR.org. December 15. [URL].
Kessel, Stijn van, and Remco Castelein
2016 “Shifting the Blame. Populist Politicians’ Use of Twitter as a Tool of Opposition.” Journal of Contemporary European Research 12 (2): 594–614.Google Scholar
KhosraviNik, Maqjid, and Johann W. Unger
2016 “Critical Discourse Studies and Social Media: Power, Resistance and Critique in Changing Media Ecologies.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Studies, edited by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 3rd ed., 205–33. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Krzyżanowski, Michał
2018 “Discursive Shifts in Ethno-Nationalist Politics: On Politicisation and Mediatisation of the ‘Refugee Crisis’ in Poland” 16 (1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krzyżanowski, Michał, and Ruth Wodak
2009The Politics of Exclusion: Debating Migration in Austria. New Brunswick, N.J: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George
2016 “Understanding Trump.” George Lakoff. July 24. [URL].
Mudde, Cas
2004 “The Populist Zeitgeist.” Government and Opposition 39 (4): 541–63. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Nilsson, Bo, and Eric Carlsson
2014 “Swedish Politicians and New Media: Democracy, Identity and Populism in a Digital Discourse.” New Media & Society 16 (4): 655–71. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Ott, Brian L.
2017 “The Age of Twitter: Donald J. Trump and the Politics of Debasement.” Critical Studies in Media Communication 34 (1): 59–68. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Richardson, John E., and Monica Colombo
2014 “Race and Immigration in Far- and Extreme-Right European Political Leaflets.” In Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies, edited by Christopher Hart and Cap, 521–42. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Richardson, John E., and Ruth Wodak
2009 “Recontextualising Fascist Ideologies of the Past: Right-Wing Discourses on Employment and Nativism in Austria and the United Kingdom.” Critical Discourse Studies 6 (4): 251–67. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Taggart, Paul
2000Populism. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Theocharis, Yannis, Pablo Barberá, Zoltán Fazekas, Sebastian Adrian Popa, and Olivier Parnet
2016 “A Bad Workman Blames His Tweets: The Consequences of Citizens’ Uncivil Twitter Use When Interacting With Party Candidates.” Journal of Communication 66 (6): 1007–1031. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth
2008 “Us’ and ‘Them’: Inclusion and Exclusion-Discrimination via Discourse.” In Identity, Belonging and Migration, edited by G. Delanty, R. Wodak, and P. Jones, 54–77. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 “Politics as Usual.” In The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, edited by M. Handford and J. P. Gee, 525–40. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
2015The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 108 other publications

Abo-Zena, Mona M. & Waheeda Saif
2021. “Please god, don’t let it be Muslims”: perspectives on guiding conversations with Muslim children in a climate with prevalent Islamophobi. Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought 40:2  pp. 166 ff. DOI logo
Akbar, Paisal, Bambang Irawan, Mohammad Taufik, Achmad Nurmandi & Suswanta
2021. Social Media in Politic: Political Campaign on United States Election 2020 Between Donald Trump and Joe Biden. In HCI International 2021 - Late Breaking Posters [Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1499],  pp. 359 ff. DOI logo
Andrews, David L.
2019. Trumping the Uber-Sport Assemblage. In Making Sport Great Again,  pp. 103 ff. DOI logo
Archer, Allison M. N., Carolyn E. Schmitt, Shannon C. McGregor & Heesoo Jang
2024. Presidential Authority and the Legitimation of Far-Right News. The International Journal of Press/Politics DOI logo
Bingaman, James & Scott E. Caplan
2023. Cyberbully-in-chief: exploring Donald Trump’s aggressive communication behavior on Twitter. Atlantic Journal of Communication 31:4  pp. 342 ff. DOI logo
Bonilla, Laura
2022. Claves para analizar datos en Twitter. Recolección y procesamiento de corpus. Cuadernos de Lingüística Hispánica :39  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Butler, Daniel M., Thad Kousser & Stan Oklobdzija
2023. Do Male and Female Legislators Have Different Twitter Communication Styles?. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 23:2  pp. 117 ff. DOI logo
Cao, Le & Runya Qiaoan
2023. Digital populism in an authoritarian context: A discourse analysis of the legitimization of the Belt and Road Initiative by China’s party media. The Communication Review 26:4  pp. 350 ff. DOI logo
Carson, Andrea, Gosia Mikolajczak, Leah Ruppanner & Emily Foley
2024. From online trolls to ‘Slut Shaming’: understanding the role of incivility and gender abuse in local government. Local Government Studies 50:2  pp. 427 ff. DOI logo
Cervi, Laura, Fernando García & Carles Marín-Lladó
2021. Populism, Twitter, and COVID-19: Narrative, Fantasies, and Desires. Social Sciences 10:8  pp. 294 ff. DOI logo
Collins, Jr., Paul M. & Matthew Eshbaugh-Soha
2020. The President and the Supreme Court, DOI logo
Dayter, Daria & Thomas C. Messerli
2022. Persuasive language and features of formality on the r/ChangeMyView subreddit. Internet Pragmatics 5:1  pp. 165 ff. DOI logo
Di Silvestro, Ester
2022. “GET SMART U.S.”. A Critical Discourse Analysis of Donald Trump’s Populist Discourse on Twitter. In Concepts, Discourses, and Translations [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ],  pp. 171 ff. DOI logo
Dobkiewicz, Patryk
2019. Instagram narratives in Trump’s America. Journal of Language and Politics 18:6  pp. 826 ff. DOI logo
Dobkiewicz, Patryk, Agnieszka Chmiel & Małgorzata Fabiszak
2023. Source text ideological load modulates ideological shifts in interpreting right-wing and left-wing political discourse, but interpreters’ political orientation does not. Ampersand 11  pp. 100151 ff. DOI logo
Dumitrescu, Delia & Andrew R N Ross
2021. Embedding, quoting, or paraphrasing? Investigating the effects of political leaders’ tweets in online news articles: The case of Donald Trump. New Media & Society 23:8  pp. 2279 ff. DOI logo
Dunn, R. Chase
2019. “You sir are a hypocrite”: responses to Pence’s MLK Day tweets as attention intervention. Atlantic Journal of Communication 27:5  pp. 354 ff. DOI logo
Flores Morales, Josefina & Fanni Farago
2021. “Of Course We Need to Help the Undocumented Immigrants!”: Twitter Discourse on the (Un)deservingness of Undocumented Immigrants in the United States during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sociological Perspectives 64:5  pp. 765 ff. DOI logo
Frederick, Evan, Ann Pegoraro & Jimmy Sanderson
2021. Sport in the Age of Trump: An Analysis of Donald Trump’s Tweets. International Journal of Sport Communication 14:3  pp. 356 ff. DOI logo
Frederick, Evan L., Ann Pegoraro & Samuel Schmidt
2022. “I’m Not going to the f***ing White House”: Twitter Users React to Donald Trump and Megan Rapinoe. Communication & Sport 10:6  pp. 1210 ff. DOI logo
Fritsch, Jonas, Jette Kofoed & Camilla Møhring Reestorff
2020. Strategic Cyberbullying and the Reorganisation of Political Culture. Conjunctions 7:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Ganesh, Bharath
2020. Weaponizing white thymos: flows of rage in the online audiences of the alt-right. Cultural Studies 34:6  pp. 892 ff. DOI logo
Gelman, Jeremy, Steven Lloyd Wilson & Constanza Sanhueza Petrarca
2021. Mixing messages: How candidates vary in their use of Twitter. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 18:1  pp. 101 ff. DOI logo
Goh, Tiong-Thye, Zhuo Xin & Dawei Jin
2019. Habit formation in social media consumption: a case of political engagement. Behaviour & Information Technology 38:3  pp. 273 ff. DOI logo
Gori, Leonella, Pier Luigi Sacco, Emanuele Teti & Francesca Triveri
2024. Commentary—Much ado About Something Else. Donald Trump, the US Stock Market, and the Public Interest Ethics of Social Media Communication. International Journal of Business Communication 61:2  pp. 452 ff. DOI logo
Gruber, Helmut
2019. Are Austrian presidential candidates ordinary people?. In The Construction of ‘Ordinariness’ across Media Genres [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 307],  pp. 21 ff. DOI logo
Gruber, Helmut
Guerrero-Solé, Frederic, Sara Suárez-Gonzalo, Cristòfol Rovira & Lluís Codina
2020. Social media, context collapse and the future of data-driven populism. El profesional de la información DOI logo
Guitar, Joshua
2021. Reclaiming White Spaces: Reading Trump’s Inaugural Address as a Eulogy for the <American Dream>. Western Journal of Communication 85:3  pp. 299 ff. DOI logo
Haeder, Simon F. & Jacqueline Chattopadhyay
2022. The Power of a Tweet? Social Media, Presidential Communication, and the Politics of Health. Presidential Studies Quarterly 52:2  pp. 436 ff. DOI logo
Hansson, Sten & Ruth Page
2023. Legitimation in government social media communication: the case of the Brexit department. Critical Discourse Studies 20:4  pp. 361 ff. DOI logo
Hart, Roderick P.
2022. Why Trump Lost and How? A Rhetorical Explanation. American Behavioral Scientist 66:1  pp. 7 ff. DOI logo
Herkman, Juha
2018. Old patterns on new clothes? Populism and political scandals in the Nordic countries. Acta Sociologica 61:4  pp. 341 ff. DOI logo
Hernández Guerrero, María José
2020. The translation of tweets in Spanish digital newspapers. Perspectives 28:3  pp. 376 ff. DOI logo
Hoffmann, Christian R.
2018. Crooked Hillary and Dumb Trump. Internet Pragmatics 1:1  pp. 55 ff. DOI logo
Hummel, Joshua R.
2022. “American Defenders Against an Illegal Invasion”: Dual Racialization Processes in Collective Identity Formation. American Behavioral Scientist 66:12  pp. 1688 ff. DOI logo
Jaworska, Sylvia, Michael K. Goodman & Iwona Gibas
2024. The Making of #CovidTwitter: Who Were the Loudest “Covid Influencers” and What Did They Say About the COVID-19 Pandemic?. Social Media + Society 10:1 DOI logo
Kjeldgaard-Christiansen, Jens
2024. The Voice of the People: Populism and Donald Trump’s Use of Informal Voice. Society DOI logo
Knoblock, Natalia
2020. Silent Majority or Vocal Minority: A Corpus-Assisted Discourse Study of Trump Supporters’ Facebook Communication. Open Library of Humanities 6:2 DOI logo
Koch, Lars, Tobias Nanz & Christina Rogers
2020. The Great Disruptor. Eine Annäherung. In The Great Disruptor,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Koch, Lars, Tobias Nanz & Christina Rogers
2023. The Great Disruptor. Eine Annäherung. In The Great Disruptor,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Kosman, Marcin
2023. New Polish Right – politeness and radicalism. A corpus analysis of Krzysztof Bosak’s (de)legitimation strategies on twitter. New Perspectives 31:3  pp. 200 ff. DOI logo
Kosman, Marcin
2024. Strategie (de)legitymizacyjne kandydatów w wyborach na prezydenta Rzeszowa w 2021 roku. Analiza korpusowa wpisów na Twitterze. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej 20:1  pp. 124 ff. DOI logo
Kumar, Ritesh
2020. #shutdownjnu vs #standwithjnu. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 8:1  pp. 29 ff. DOI logo
Külz, Jonathan, Andreas Spitz, Ahmad Abu-Akel, Stephan Günnemann & Robert West
2023. United States politicians’ tone became more negative with 2016 primary campaigns. Scientific Reports 13:1 DOI logo
Lammers, Joris & Matthew Baldwin
2020. Make America gracious again: Collective nostalgia can increase and decrease support for right‐wing populist rhetoric. European Journal of Social Psychology 50:5  pp. 943 ff. DOI logo
LANVERS, URSULA, HANNAH DOUGHTY & AMY S. THOMPSON
2018. Brexit as Linguistic Symptom of Britain Retreating into its Shell? Brexit‐Induced Politicization of Language Learning. The Modern Language Journal 102:4  pp. 775 ff. DOI logo
Lee, Jayeon
2023. Is Snapchat Discover really a news platform? News snacking from social media and users’ knowledge of current affairs. Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies 12:1  pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Leidig, Eviane, Bharath Ganesh & Jonathan Bright
2022. New forms of cultural nationalism? American and British Indians in the Trump and Brexit Twittersphere. Nations and Nationalism 28:1  pp. 302 ff. DOI logo
Lischka, Juliane A.
2021. Fighting an indestructible monster. Journal of Language and Politics 20:5  pp. 803 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Dilin & Lei Lei
2018. The appeal to political sentiment: An analysis of Donald Trump’s and Hillary Clinton’s speech themes and discourse strategies in the 2016 US presidential election. Discourse, Context & Media 25  pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Lorenzetti, Maria Ivana
2024. Sexism in Right-Wing Populist Online Discourse in Italy and the US: A Contrastive Analysis. In Constructional and Cognitive Explorations of Contrastive Linguistics,  pp. 215 ff. DOI logo
Lugea, Jane
2021. Linguistic Approaches to Fake News Detection. In Data Science for Fake News [The Information Retrieval Series, 42],  pp. 287 ff. DOI logo
Luo, Xue, Mei He & Zhonggen Yu
2022. An Ideological Analysis of the Former President Donald Trump’s Tweets During COVID-19. Corpus Pragmatics 6:1  pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
Makki, Mohammad & Andrew S. Ross
2023. “We were cocked & loaded to retaliate”. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 11:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Makki, Mohammad & Michele Zappavigna
2022. Out-grouping and ambient affiliation in Donald Trump’s tweets about Iran. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 32:1  pp. 104 ff. DOI logo
Merry, Melissa K.
2022. Trump's tweets as policy narratives: Constructing the immigration issue via social media. Politics & Policy 50:4  pp. 752 ff. DOI logo
Meyenburg, Imko
2022. “Brexit Means Brexit!”: Investigating the Production of Social Phenomena in Political Discourses. Symbolic Interaction 45:4  pp. 570 ff. DOI logo
Mihelj, Sabina & César Jiménez‐Martínez
2021. Digital nationalism: Understanding the role of digital media in the rise of ‘new’ nationalism. Nations and Nationalism 27:2  pp. 331 ff. DOI logo
Milkes Espinosa, Sara, Samantha McDonald & Benedict Salazar Olgado
2019. Companion Publication of the 2019 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing,  pp. 304 ff. DOI logo
Montgomery, Martin
2020. Populism in performance?. Journal of Language and Politics 19:5  pp. 733 ff. DOI logo
Moradi-Joz, Rasool, Saeed Ketabi & Mansoor Tavakoli
2019. On conductive argumentation. Journal of Language and Politics 18:1  pp. 83 ff. DOI logo
Musella, Fortunato
2023. How a left-wing political party fails to keep up with the times. Journal of Modern Italian Studies 28:5  pp. 585 ff. DOI logo
Müller, Philipp & Ruben L Bach
2023. Populist alternative news use and its role for elections: Web-tracking and survey evidence from two campaign periods. New Media & Society 25:10  pp. 2663 ff. DOI logo
Müller, Philipp & Rainer Freudenthaler
2022. Right-Wing, Populist, Controlled by Foreign Powers? Topic Diversification and Partisanship in the Content Structures of German-Language Alternative Media. Digital Journalism 10:8  pp. 1363 ff. DOI logo
Norris, Pippa
2019. Varieties of populist parties. Philosophy & Social Criticism 45:9-10  pp. 981 ff. DOI logo
Norris, Pippa
2020. Measuring populism worldwide. Party Politics 26:6  pp. 697 ff. DOI logo
Ohm, Britta, Vibodh Parthasarathi & Per Ståhlberg
2019. Introduction: Critical Explorations of Media Modernity in India. Culture Unbound 10:3  pp. 322 ff. DOI logo
Osei Fordjour, Nana Kwame
2022. Fantasy Themes, Symbolic Power, and Twitter: A Multimodal Analysis of Vice President Kamala Harris’s First 90 Days. Howard Journal of Communications 33:3  pp. 314 ff. DOI logo
Ouyang, Yu & Richard W. Waterman
2020. Trump Tweets: A Desire for Attention. In Trump, Twitter, and the American Democracy,  pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Palonen, Emilia, Laura Sibinescu, Juha Koljonen & Juha Herkman
2024. Data and Methodology in the Twitter EP2019 Analysis. In Populism, Twitter and the European Public Sphere,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Perrez, Julien, François Randour & Min Reuchamps
2019. De l’uniformité du discours politique : analyse bibliométrique et linguistique de la catégorisation des discours politiques. CogniTextes 19:Volume 19 DOI logo
Randour, François, Julien Perrez & Min Reuchamps
2020. Twenty years of research on political discourse: A systematic review and directions for future research. Discourse & Society 31:4  pp. 428 ff. DOI logo
Reyes, Antonio & Andrew Ross
2021. From the White House with anger: Conversational features in President Trump's official communication. Language & Communication 77  pp. 46 ff. DOI logo
Rivers, Damian J. & Andrew S. Ross
2020. Authority (de)legitimation in the border wall Twitter discourse of President Trump. Journal of Language and Politics 19:5  pp. 831 ff. DOI logo
Roca-Cuberes, Carles & Alyssa Young
2020. Vox Populi? Trump’s Twitter Page as Public Forum. Social Sciences 9:12  pp. 226 ff. DOI logo
Ross, Andrew S. & Damian J. Rivers
2020. Donald Trump, legitimisation and a new political rhetoric. World Englishes 39:4  pp. 623 ff. DOI logo
Sahly, Abdulsamad, Chun Shao & K. Hazel Kwon
2019. Social Media for Political Campaigns: An Examination of Trump’s and Clinton’s Frame Building and Its Effect on Audience Engagement. Social Media + Society 5:2  pp. 205630511985514 ff. DOI logo
Sant, Edda & Tony Brown
2021. The fantasy of the populist disease and the educational cure. British Educational Research Journal 47:2  pp. 409 ff. DOI logo
Schertzer, Robert & Eric Woods
2021. #Nationalism: the ethno-nationalist populism of Donald Trump’s Twitter communication. Ethnic and Racial Studies 44:7  pp. 1154 ff. DOI logo
Schneider, Ulrike
2021. How Trump tweets: A comparative analysis of tweets by US politicians. Research in Corpus Linguistics 9:2  pp. 34 ff. DOI logo
Schumann, Sandy, Diana Boer, Katja Hanke & James Liu
2021. Social media use and support for populist radical right parties: assessing exposure and selection effects in a two-wave panel study. Information, Communication & Society 24:7  pp. 921 ff. DOI logo
Scotto di Carlo, Giuseppina
2020. Trumping Twitter. Journal of Language and Politics 19:1  pp. 48 ff. DOI logo
Shafie, Rus Shafinas
2022. International Academic Symposium of Social Science 2022,  pp. 97 ff. DOI logo
Shao, Wanyun & Feng Hao
2021. Understanding American Public Support for COVID-19 Risk Mitigation: The Role of Political Orientation, Socio-Demographic characteristics, Personal Concern, and Experience, the United States, 2020. International Journal of Public Health 66 DOI logo
Shin, Jieun, Aimei Yang, Wenlin Liu, Hye Min Kim, Alvin Zhou & Jingyi Sun
2022. Mask-Wearing as a Partisan Issue: Social Identity and Communication of Party Norms on Social Media Among Political Elites. Social Media + Society 8:1  pp. 205630512210862 ff. DOI logo
Soóky, Roman
2022. How (Un)Freedom is Being Developed: The Linguistic World of One Political Party in Slovakia Concerning Liberalism. Journal of Linguistics/Jazykovedný casopis 73:3  pp. 329 ff. DOI logo
Sun, Ya, Gongyuan Wang & Hui Ren
2021. To Entertain or to Serve: Chinese and US Banks’ Online Identity Based on a Genre Analysis of Social Media. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 64:2  pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Thakur, Nirmalya
2022. Twitter Big Data as a Resource for Exoskeleton Research: A Large-Scale Dataset of about 140,000 Tweets from 2017–2022 and 100 Research Questions. Analytics 1:2  pp. 72 ff. DOI logo
Thakur, Nirmalya
2022. Twitter Big Data as a Resource for Exoskeleton Research: A Large-Scale Dataset of about 140,000 Tweets and 100 Research Questions. SSRN Electronic Journal DOI logo
Tong, Jingrong & Landong Zuo
2020. Mainstreaming populism through the Twitter practices of politicians and the news media: A case study of the 2016 Brexit referendum debates. Information Polity 25:3  pp. 361 ff. DOI logo
Underwood, Tom W. & Jo Angouri
2021. “The people watching at home”. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 9:2  pp. 297 ff. DOI logo
van Raalte, Anoek, Pieter Maeseele & Sean Phelan
2021. Twitter as a right-wing populist’s playground: The algorithmic populism of Dutch political party ‘Forum voor Democratie’ and leader Thierry Baudet during their political rise. Discourse, Context & Media 44  pp. 100549 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Hairuo
2024. Linguistic Analysis of News Title Strategies in Media Frame—A Case Study of “The Mueller Investigation” in the News Titles of The New York Times and Fox News. Journalism and Media 5:1  pp. 342 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Xiangyu, Min Zhang, Weiguo Fan & Kang Zhao
2022. Understanding the spread ofCOVID‐19 misinformation on social media: The effects of topics and a political leader's nudge. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 73:5  pp. 726 ff. DOI logo
Wignell, Peter, Sabine Tan, Kay L. O’Halloran & Kevin Chai
2021. The Twittering Presidents. Journal of Language and Politics 20:2  pp. 197 ff. DOI logo
Wodak, Ruth
2022. Shameless normalization as a result of media control: The case of Austria. Discourse & Society 33:6  pp. 788 ff. DOI logo
Wodak, Ruth, Jonathan Culpeper & Elena Semino
2021. Shameless normalisation of impoliteness: Berlusconi’s and Trump’s press conferences. Discourse & Society 32:3  pp. 369 ff. DOI logo
Worrall, Adam, Ana Ndumu & Lynette Hammond Gerido
2022. Sentiment and Network Analysis of Twitter Reactions to the U.S. Birthright Citizenship Ban Debate. In Information for a Better World: Shaping the Global Future [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 13193],  pp. 149 ff. DOI logo
Wright, Scott
2021. Beyond ‘fake news’?. Journal of Language and Politics 20:5  pp. 719 ff. DOI logo
Xie, Zheng, Xu Zhang, Xiang Ling & Li Zhang
2022. 2022 7th International Conference on Big Data Analytics (ICBDA),  pp. 160 ff. DOI logo
Yang, Li, Jianfei Yu, Chengzhi Zhang & Jin-Cheon Na
2021. Fine-Grained Sentiment Analysis of Political Tweets with Entity-Aware Multimodal Network. In Diversity, Divergence, Dialogue [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 12645],  pp. 411 ff. DOI logo
Yilmaz, Ihsan & Greg Barton
2021. Political Mobilisation of Religious, Chauvinist, and Technocratic Populists in Indonesia and Their Activities in Cyberspace. Religions 12:10  pp. 822 ff. DOI logo
Zappavigna, Michele
2022. Social media quotation practices and ambient affiliation: Weaponising ironic quotation for humorous ridicule in political discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 191  pp. 98 ff. DOI logo
Zheng, Jennifer & Joseph P. Zompetti
2023. ‘I’m not a virus’: Asian hate in Donald Trump’s rhetoric. Asian Journal of Communication 33:5  pp. 470 ff. DOI logo
Zheng, Xiaolong, Xiao Wang, Zepeng Li, Rongrong Jing, Shuqi Xu, Tao Wang, Lifang Li, Zhenwen Zhang, Qingpeng Zhang, Huaiguang Jiang, Zhihua Guo, Xiaowei Zhang & Fei-Yue Wang
2021. Donald J. Trump’s Presidency in Cyberspace: A Case Study of Social Perception and Social Influence in Digital Oligarchy Era. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems 8:2  pp. 279 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. References. In The Brexit Referendum on Twitter,  pp. 73 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. References. In The Incel Rebellion: The Rise of the Manosphere and the Virtual War Against Women,  pp. 129 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.