Cover not available
Article published In:
Democracy and Discriminatory Strategies in Parliamentary Discourse
Edited by Karin Bischof and Cornelia Ilie
[Journal of Language and Politics 17:5] 2018
► pp. 655–675

Redescribing the Nation

Anti-Semitism as a tool of nation-building in the Hungarian Numerus Clausus debates, 1920–1928

ORCID logo | University of Jyväskylä

Boosting national spirit through projection of otherness is not a new phenomenon, at least in authoritarian regimes. Yet the role of anti-Semitism in the Numerus Clausus debates in the Hungarian parliament in 1920 and 1928 is worth deeper analysis, as it bore a peculiar role in the Hungarian interwar counterrevolutionary nation-building. The Numerus Clausus law of 1920 set ethnic quotas to university enrolment; the explicit argument for this was countering the Jewish ‘over-representation’ in Hungarian society. However, in 1928 the law was amended, abolishing (in principle) the said quotas; this time the arguments favoured national consolidation, where segregation was to be moderated. In both cases, the national elites construed and made use of nation-centred political rhetoric, but used it for differing ends in different times. This article shall analyse the debates of the Hungarian Parliament concerning the Numerus Clausus laws, especially from the viewpoints of nation-building and rhetoric of exclusion.

Keywords: 1920s, anti-Semitism, Hungary, nation-building, political culture, political rhetoric
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Sources and methodology
  • 3.Numerus Clausus of 1920 – anti-Semitism within the counterrevolutionary discourse
  • 4.From counterrevolution to consolidation – a way to the amendment in 1928
  • 5.The Amendment debate – the heyday of consolidation?
  • 6.Conclusions: The pitfalls of a ‘gentlemanly’ anti-Semitism
  • 7.Afterword: Reappearances of anti-Semitist and anti-Liberal rhetoric
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 14 August 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.18011.hak
References
BBC
2017 “Hungary passes bill targeting Central European University.” BBC News, April 4 2017 [URL].
Bodo, Béla
2010 “Hungarian Aristocracy and the White Terror.” Journal of Contemporary History 45 (4): 703–724. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Czenkli, Dorka
2014 “Áll a szobor, csorog a tojás – Jelentés a Szabadság térről.” Magyar Narancs Online, July 20 2014 [URL].
Gajdics, Ottó
2017 “Botka bontást is vállal.” Magyar Idők, May 27 2017 [URL].
Halmesvirta, Anssi
2013 “Unkarin äärioikeistoliikkeet 1930-luvulla.” Historiallinen aikakauskirja 111 (3): 354–359.Google Scholar
Hanebrink, Paul A.
2006 In Defence of Christian Hungary. Religion, Nationalism and Antisemitism, 1890–1944. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Holocaust Memorial Year
2014 “Holocaust in Hungary.” [URL].
Hubai, László
2001 Magyarország XX. századi választási atlasza, 1920–2000 (I). Budapest: Napvilág Kiadó.Google Scholar
Häkkinen, Teemu
2014 “The Royal Prerogative Redefined: Parliamentary Debate on the Role of the British Parliament in Large-scale Military Deployments, 1982–2003.” Jyväskylä Studies in Humanities vol. 2241. PhD diss., University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
Ihalainen, Pasi
2016 “European Parliamentary Experiences from a Conceptual Historical Perspective.” In Parliament and Parliamentarism: A Comparative History of a European Concept, edited by Pasi Ihalainen, Cornelia Ilie and Kari Palonen, 19–31. New York: Berghahn. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia
2016 “Parliamentary Discourse and Deliberative Rhetoric.” In Parliament and Parliamentarism: A Comparative History of a European Concept, edited by Pasi Ihalainen, Cornelia Ilie and Kari Palonen, 133–145. New York: Berghahn. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaarkoski, Miina
2016 “ ‘Energiemix’ versus ‘Energiewende’: Competing Conceptualisations of Nuclear Energy Policy in the German Parliamentary Debates of 1991–2001.” Jyväskylä Studies in Humanities vol. 2901. PhD diss., University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
Karady, Victor, and Peter Tibor Nagy
eds. 2012 The Numerus Clausus in Hungary. Studies on the First Anti-Jewish Law and Academic Anti-Semitism in Modern Central Europe. Budapest: Central European University. [URL].
Kontler, László
1999 Millennium in Central Europe. A History of Hungary. Budapest: Atlantisz Publishing House.Google Scholar
Kovács, Mária M.
2012 “The Hungarian Numerus Clausus: Ideology, Apology and History, 1919–1945.” In The Numerus Clausus in Hungary. Studies on the First Anti-Jewish Law and Academic Anti-Semitism in Modern Central Europe, edited by Victor Karady and Peter Tibor Nagy, 27–55. Budapest: Central European University. [URL].
Kovács, Zoltán
2017 “Myths and Facts about Hungary and George Soros (Part 2).” About Hungary, May 30 2017 [URL].
KSH
2011 “2011 évi népszámlalás, Demográfiai adatok.” Központi sztatiztikai hivatál. [URL].
Ladányi, Andor
2012 “On the 1928 Amendment to the Hungarian Numerus Clausus Act.” In The Numerus Clausus in Hungary. Studies on the First Anti-Jewish Law and Academic Anti-Semitism in Modern Central Europe, edited by Victor Karady and Peter Tibor Nagy, 69–111. Budapest: Central European University. [URL].
Magyar Idők
2017a “Deutsch Tamás: Soros indított hadjáratot a magyar kormány ellen, nem fordítva.” Magyar Idők, May 29 2017 [URL].
2017b “Fidesz: Újabb nyomásgyakorolás a mai tüntetés.” Magyar Idők, May 29 2017 [URL].
Mazsihisz
2017 “Magyarországon nem bűn sem zsidónak, sem cionistának lenni.” May 25 2017 [URL].
Orbán, Viktor
2014a “Orbán Viktor beszéde a miniszterelnöki eskütételét követően.” May 10 2014 [URL].
2014b “Orbán Viktor beszéde a XXV. Bálványosi Nyári Szabadegyetem és Diáktáborban.” June 26 2014 [URL].
Paksa, Rudolf
2013 Magyar nemzetisocialisták. Budapest: Osiris Kiadó.Google Scholar
Paxton, Robert O., and Julie Hessler
2012 Europe in the Twentieth Century. Fifth Edition. Boston: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Püski, Levente
2006 A Horthy-rendszer. Budapest: Pannonica Kiadó.Google Scholar
Ripp, Zoltán
2010 “Egy szürke eminenciás színeváltozásai.” Mozgó Világ Online, January 2010 [URL].
Romsics, Ignác
1999 Hungary in the Twentieth Century. Translated by Tim Wilkinson. Budapest: Corvina.Google Scholar
2001 “Bevezetés. A történetírás objektivitásának mítoszáról és a múlt tmitizálásának elfogafhatatlanságáról.” In Mítoszok, legendák, tévhitek a 20. századi magyar történelemről, edited by Ignác Romsics, 7–27. Budapest: Osiris Kiadó.Google Scholar
Sakmyster, Thomas L.
1994 Hungary’s Admiral on Horseback. Miklós Horthy, 1920–1944. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin
1999 “Rhetoric and Conceptual Change.” Finnish Yearbook of Political Thought Vol. 31: 60–73.Google Scholar
Turbucz, Dávid
2011 Horthy Miklós. Budapest: Napvilág Kiadó.Google Scholar
Ungváry, Krisztián
2013 A Horthy-rendszer mérlege. Diszkrimináció, szociálpolitika és antiszemitizmus Magyarországon. Budapest: Jelenkór Kiadó.Google Scholar
Zeidler, Miklós
2007 Ideas on Territorial Revision in Hungary, 1920–1945. Translated by Thomas, J. and Helen DeKornfeld. Boulder, CO: Social Science Monographs.Google Scholar