Battlefield EU
Macedonian parties’ representations in times of crisis
EU is a discursive field where multiple meanings and representations are created, negotiated and contested.
Research has shown that the concept possess an interpretive power often used as an instrument of political confrontation. Such is
the case, this study argues, with the two largest Macedonian parties – VMRO-DPMNE and the Social Democrats – who in a pursuit of
changing or maintaining the power structuration in the society have produced a discourse on EU that best fits their political
agendas. In a situation of a prolonged political crisis, and a significant involvement of EU, the two parties have commodified the
discourse on EU into an instrument of self-promotion and/or criticism of the other. Demonstrating the instrumental use of the
representations of EU by analysing the discursive strategies and the linguistic means deployed are the general aims of this
study.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Constructing (and criticizing) EU
- 3.Crisis and its discursive effects
- 4.Constructing oneself, constructing (and criticizing) the other
- 5.Methodological design
- 6.Data selection
- 7.Data analysis
- 7.1VMRO DPMNE
- 7.2Social Democrats
- 8.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
-
References
References
Angouri, Jo, and Ruth Wodak
2014 “
They became big in the shadow of the crisis’: The Greek success story and the rise of the far right.”
Discourse & Society 25(4): 540–565.
Brief
2014 Заев: Само на Груевски и фамилијата им одговара да ја изгубиме препораката за ЕУ,поради милионските бизниси. [Zaev: Only Gruevski and his family will profit from losing the recommendations].
Brief 24 June. Available at
[URL] (accessed 2 October 2017).
Brinar, Irena, and Marjan Svetlicic
1999 “
Enlargement of the European Union: The Case of Slovenia.”
Journal of European Public Policy 6(5): 802–21.
Chilton, Paul
2004 Analyzing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London and New York: Routledge.
Conti, Nicolo
2007 “
Domestic parties and European integration: The problem of party attitudes to the EU, and the europeanisation of parties.”
European Political Science 61:192–207.
Conti, Nicolo, Swen Hutter, and Nanou Kyriaki
2018 “
Party competition and political representation in crisis: An introductory note.”
Party Politics 24(1): 3–9.
Damjanovski, Ivan
2018 Analysis of Public Opinion on Macedonia`s Accession to the European Union (2014–2017).
Konrad Adenauer Foundation in the Republic of Macedonia Institute for Democracy “Societas Civilis” – Skopje; available at:
[URL]
Delanty, Gerard
1995 Inventing Europe: Idea, Identity, Reality. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Deutsche Welle
2016 Иванов за „Билд“: 25 години ЕУ нѐ лаже и манипулира! [Ivanov for “Der Bild”: For 25 years EU has lied and manipulated us!] Available at:
[URL] (accessed 2 October 2017).
Dolezal, Martin, Laurenz Ennser-Jedenastik, L. Wolfgang Muller, Katrin Praprotnik, and Anna Katharina Winkler
2016 “
Beyond salience and position taking: How political parties communicate through their manifestos.”
Party Politics: 1–13
Fonseca, Pedro, and Maria João Ferreira
2015 “
Through ‘seas never before sailed’: Portuguese government discursive legitimation strategies in a context of financial crisis.”
Discourse & Society 26 (6): 682–711.
Fortchner, Bernhard, and Christoffer Kølvraa
2012 “
Narrating a ‘new Europe’: From ‘bitter past’ to self-righteousness?”
Discourse & Society 231:377–400.
Hardt-Mautner, Gerlinde
1995 “
How does one become a good European?’ : The British press and European integration.”
Discourse & Society 61: 177–205.
Henderson, Karen
(ed) 1999 Back to Europe: Central and Eastern Europe and the European Union. London. UCL press.
Hood, Cristopher
2011 The Blame Game: Spin, Bureaucracy and Self-preservation in Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hooghe, Liesbet, Gary Marks, and Carole J. Wilson
2002 “
Does left/right structure party positions on European integration?”
Comparative Political Studies 351: 965–989.
Hutter, Swen, Hanspeter Kriesi, and Guillem Vidal
2018 “
Old versus new politics: The political spaces in Southern Europe in times of crises.”
Party Politics 24(1): 10–22.
Kanal 5
2015 Gruevski: влез во НАТО и ЕУ останува наша стратешка цел. [
Gruevski: entering NATO and EU remains our strategic goal], available at:
[URL] (accessed 28 October 2018)
Kopecky, Petr, and Cas Mudde
2002 “
The two sides of Euroscepticism: party positions on Euroscepticism in East Central Europe.”
European Union Politics 3(3): 297–326.
Kosic, Ankica, and Anna Triandafyllidou
Krzyżanowski, Michal, Anna Triandafyllidou, and Ruth Wodak
2018 “
The Mediatization and the Politicization of the “Refugee Crisis” in Europe.”
Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies 16 (1-2): 1–14.
Ladrech, Robert
2002 “
Europeanization and political parties: Towards a Framework for Analysis.”
Party Politics 81: 389–403.
Majstorovic, Danijela
2007 “
Construction of Europeanization in the High Representatives discourse in Bosnia and Herzegovina.”
Discourse & Society 181: 627–651.
Malmberg, Af Mikael, and Bo Strath
2002 “
Introduction: The national meanings of Europe.” In
The Meaning of Europe: Variety and Contention within and among Nations, edited by
Mikael Af Malmberg and
Bo Strath, 1–26. Oxford and New York: Berg.
Netpress
2015 Иванов: На регионот му е потребна недоложна интеграција во ЕУ и НАТО [
Ivanov: the region needs an urgent integration in EU and NATO]. Available at:
[URL]
Oberhuber, Florian, Christoph Bärenreuter, Michal Krzyzanowski, Heinz Schönbauer, and Ruth Wodak
Pagden, Anthony
2002 “
Europe: conceptualizing a continent.” In
The Idea of Europe: From Antiquity to European Union, edited by
Anthony Pagden, 33–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pirro, Andrea LP., Paul Taggart, and Stijn van Kessel
2018 “
The populist politics of Euroscepticism in times of crisis: Comparative conclusions.”
Politics 38 (3): 1–13.
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
2001 Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London and New York: Routledge.
Szczerbiak, Aleks, and Paul Taggart
(eds) 2008 Opposing Europe? The Comparative Party Politics of Euroscepticism. Oxford.
Social Democratic Union of Macedonia
2011 Имаме решенија [
We have solutions], election program. Available at:
[URL] (accessed October 27 2018).
Social Democratic Union of Macedonia
2016 План за живот во Македонија [
Plan for a life in Macedonia], election program. Available at:
[URL] (accessed 27 October 2018).
SDSM
2016b АВМУ призна вина, реформи во медиумскиот простор се неопходни [
AMVU admitted guilt, reforms in the media are necessary], Available at:
[URL] (accessed 28 October 2018)
Stojic, Marko
2006 “
Between Europhobia and Europhilia: Party and popular attitudes towards membership of the European union in Serbia and Croatia.”
Perspectives on European Politics and Society 7 (3): 312–335.
Vecer
2015 Груевски испука поситивни бомби [
Gruevski fired positive bombs] available at:
[URL]
VMRO DPMNE
2014 Проверено [
checked], election program. Available at:
[URL] (accessed 2 October 2017).
VMRO DPMNE
2016 Реално [
Real], election program. Available at:
[URL] (accessed 2 October 2017).
Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf de Cillia, Martin Reisigl, and Karin Liebhart
1999 The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Zielonka, Jan
2013 “
Europe’s new civilizing missions: the EU’s normative power discourse.”
Journal of Political Ideologies 181: 35–55.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Takovski, Aleksandar
2022.
Political alliance with COVID-19: Macedonian politics and the strategic use of the pandemic.
Discourse & Society 33:2
► pp. 215 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.