Article published in:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 18:6 (2019) ► pp. 893914
References

References

Abdelzaher, Esra
2019a “Lexicon-based Detection of Violence on Social Media.” Cognitive Semantics 5(1): 32–69. Crossref link
2019b “The Systematic Adaptation of Violence Contexts in the ISIS Discourse: A Contrastive Corpus Based Study.” 3(2): 173–203. Crossref link
Al-Rikaby, Ali Badeen Mohammed, and Tengku Sepora Tengku Mahadi
. “The significance of the discursive strategies in al-Baghdadi’s and al-Zawahiri’s hortatory speeches.” Journal of Language and Politics 17(6 2018: 769–788. Crossref link
Arosoaie, Aida
2017 “In the name of honour and freedom: the sacred as a justifying tool for ISIS’and secular violence.” Culture and Religion 18(3): 278–295. Crossref link
Atkins, Sue, Michael Rundell, and Hiroaki Sato
2003 “The contribution of FrameNet to practical lexicography.” International Journal of Lexicography 16(3): 333–357. Crossref link
Baker, Paul, and Rachelle Vessey
2018 “A corpus-driven comparison of English and French Islamist extremist texts.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 23(3): 255–278. Crossref link
Clifton, Jonathan
2017 “Justifying the jihad.” Journal of Language and Politics 16(3): 453–470. Crossref link
Essam, Bacem A., Mostafa M. Aref, and Fayrouz Fouad
2019 “When folkloric geopolitical concerns prompt a conspiratorial ideation: the case of Egyptian tweeters.” Geo Journal 84(1): 121–133. Crossref link
Fillmore, Charles J.
1975 “An alternative to checklist theories of meaning.” In Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 1, pp. 123–131. Crossref link
2006 “Frame semantics.” Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings 34: 373–400. Crossref link
Fillmore, Charles J., and Collin Baker
2011 “A frames approach to semantic analysis.” In The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis. pp. 313–340. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref link
Fillmore, Charles J., Miriam RL Petruck, Josef Ruppenhofer, and Abby Wright
2003 “FrameNet in action: The case of attaching.” International journal of lexicography 16(3): 297–332. Crossref link
Gerges, Fawaz A.
2009The far enemy: why Jihad went global. Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Heickerö, Roland
2014 “Cyber terrorism: Electronic jihad.” Strategic Analysis 38(4): 554–565. Crossref link
Lakhfif, Abdelaziz, and Mohamed Tayeb Laskri
2016 “A frame-based approach for capturing semantics from Arabic text for text-to-sign language MT.” International Journal of Speech Technology 19(2): 203–228. Crossref link
Maggio, James
2007 “The presidential rhetoric of terror: The recreation of reality immediately after 9/11.” Politics & Policy 35(4): 810–835. Crossref link
Novenario, Celine Marie I.
Differentiating Al Qaeda and the Islamic State through strategies publicized in Jihadist magazines.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 39(11) 2016: 953–967. Crossref link
Pennebaker, James W.
2011 “Using computer analyses to identify language style and aggressive intent: The secret life of function words.” Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict 4(2): 92–102. Crossref link
Petruck, Miriam RL.
1996 “Frame semantics. Handbook of Pragmatics.” Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Pratt, Mary Louise
. “Harm’s way: Language and the contemporary arts of war.” PMLA 124(5) 2009: 1515–1531. Crossref link
Ruppenhofer, Josef, Michael Ellsworth, Myriam Schwarzer-Petruck, Christopher R. Johnson, and Jan Scheffczyk
2006 “FrameNet II: Extended theory and practice.” Berkeley Online Library.
Schröter, Melani
. “Addressee orientation in political speeches: Tracing the dialogical ‘other’in argumentative monologue.” Journal of Language and Politics 13(2) 2014: 289–312. Crossref link
Schubert, Christoph
2014 “Cognitive categorization and prototypicality as persuasive strategies: Presidential rhetoric in the USA.” Journal of Language and Politics 13(2): 313–335. Crossref link
Siegel, Alexandra A., and Joshua A. Tucker
. “The Islamic State’s information warfare.” Journal of Language and Politics 17(2) 2018: 258–280. Crossref link
Sikos, Jennifer, and Sebastian Padó
2018 “FrameNet’s using relation as a source of concept-based paraphrases.” Constructions and Frames 10(1): 38–60. Crossref link