Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 18:3 (2019) ► pp.323345
References
Adorno, Theodor
1973Negative Dialectics. Ernst B. Ashton (trans.). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Anderson, Ben
2002 “A Principle of Hope: Recorded Music, Listening Practices and the Immanence of Utopia.” Geografiska Annaler 84 (3–4): 211–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, Tom
(2012) Hybrid voices and collaborative change: Contextualising positive discourse analysis. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bloch, Ernst
1959/1995The Principle of Hope Vol 11. Plaice Stephen, Neville Plaice, Paul Knight. trans. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Burke, Kenneth
(1935/1984) Permanence and change: An anatomy of purpose. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
(1945/1962) A Grammar of Motives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
1952a “A dramatistic view of the origins of language.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 38 (3): 251–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1952b “A dramatistic view of the origins of language: Part two.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 38 (4): 446–460. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1952c “A dramatistic view of the origins of language: Part three.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 39 (1): 79–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1961The Rhetoric of Religion: Studies in Logology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
1967Language as symbolic action: Essays on life, literature, and method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
1985 “Dramatism and logology”. Communication Quarterly 33 (2): 89–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Sa, Alexandre Franco
2012 “From modern utopias to contemporary uchronia.” In Marder, Michale and Patricia Vieira. eds. 2012 Existential utopia: New perspectives on utopian thought. London: Continuum: 46–60.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Frances
1992The end of history and the last man. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Garforth, Lisa
2009 “No intentions? Utopian theory after the future.” Journal for Cultural Research 13 (1): 5–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goody, Jack
1977The domestication of the savage mind. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.Google Scholar
Graham, Philip
2001 “Space: Irrealis objects in technology policy and their role in the creation of a new political economy.” Discourse and Society 12 (6): 761–788. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006Hypercapitalism: New media, language, and social perceptions of value. New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2016 “Halliday and Lemke: A comparison of contextual potentials for two metafunctional systems.” Critical Discourse Studies 13 (5): 548–567. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017Strategic communication, corporatism, and eternal crisis: The Creel century. New York, NY: Taylor and Francis. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
in press. Neoliberalism, Globalisation and Militarism. In Taylor, Brian and Hamilton Bean eds. in press ICA Handbook of Communication and Security London Oxford University Press
Graham, Philip and Alan Luke
2003 “Militarising the Body Politic: New media as weapons of mass instruction.” Body and Society 9 (4): 149–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Havelock, E. A.
1978The Greek concept of justice: From its shadow in Homer to its substance in Plato. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herzler, Joyce O.
1923The history of utopian thought. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Kellner, Douglas and Harry O’Hara
1976 “Utopia and Marxism in Ernst Bloch.” New German Critique (9): 11–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lemke, Jay L.
1998 “Resources for Attitudinal meaning: Evaluative orientations in text semantics.” Functions of Language 5 (1): 33–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levitas, Ruth
2009 ‘The imaginary reconstitution of society: Utopia as method’. In Tom Moylan and Raffaela Baccolini. eds. Utopia, method, vision: The use value of social dreaming. Bern: Peter Lang: 47–68.Google Scholar
2011The concept of utopia. New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2013Utopia as method: The imaginary reconstitution of society. London: Palgrave McMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mannhein, Kurt
1954Ideology and Utopia: An introduction to the sociology of knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Manuel, Frank E.
1965 ‘Introduction’. In Frank E. Manuel. Utopias and utopian thought: A timely appraisal. New York, NY: Beacon Press. vii–xxi.Google Scholar
Martin, James Robert
2004 “Positive discourse analysis: solidarity and change.” Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 491 [Special Issue on Discourse Analysis at Work: Recent Perspectives in the Study of Language and Social Practice]: 179–200.Google Scholar
McKenna, Bernard and Philip Graham
2000 “Technocratic discourse: A primer.” Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 30 (3): 219–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
More, Thomas
1516/1901Utopia. Henry Morley. ed. Gilbert Burnet. trans. London: Cassell and Company.Google Scholar
Mumford, Lewis
1922/2008The story of utopias. Charleston, SC: BiblioBazaar.Google Scholar
Muntigl, Peter
2000Dilemmas of individualism and social necessity. In Peter Muntigl, Gilbert Weiss, & Ruth Wodak. eds. European Union Discourses on Unemployment: An interdisciplinary approach to employment policy-making and organizational change. London: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nancy, J.
2012In place of utopia. In Marder, M. and Vieira Eds. 2012 Existential utopia: New perspectives on utopian thought. London: Continuum: 22–35.Google Scholar
Noble, David
1999The religion of technology: The divinity of man and the spirit of invention. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
2005Beyond the promised land: The movement and the myth. Toronto, ON: Between the Lines.Google Scholar
Nālanda Translation Committee of Tibet
1980The Sūtra of the heart of transcendent knowledge. Nālanda Translation Committee of Tibet. Available online at: [URL]
Nordensvard, Johan
2014 “Dystopia and disutopia: Hope and hopelessness in German pupils’ future narratives.” Journal of Educational Change (15): 443–465. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Propp, Vladimir
1984Theory and history of folklore. Martin, Adriana and Richard P. Martin trans. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Rogers, Rebecca and Wetzel, Melissa M.
2013 “Studying agency in literacy teacher education: A layered approach to positive discourse analysis.” Critical Inquiry in Language Studies 10 (1): 62–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sargisson, Lucy
2012Fool’s gold? Utopianism in the twenty-first century. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Veblen, Thorstein
1914The instinct of workmanship and the state of the industrial arts. New York, NY. B. W. Heubsch.Google Scholar
Wells, Herbert George
(1905) A modern Utopia. London: Thomas Wells and Sons.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth and Meyer, Michael
2009 “Critical Discourse Analysis: History, Agenda, Theory and Methodology.” In Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, eds. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage. 1–33.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

Dunmire, Patricia
2023. Phil Graham: critical insights into the futurity of discourse and the discourse of futurity. Critical Discourse Studies  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Ekström, Hugo, Michał Krzyżanowski & David Johnson
2023. Saying ‘Criminality’, meaning ‘immigration’? Proxy discourses and public implicatures in the normalisation of the politics of exclusion. Critical Discourse Studies  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Graham, Phil & Harry Dugmore
2022. Public pedagogies in post-literate cultures. Discourse & Society 33:6  pp. 819 ff. DOI logo
Krzyżanowski, Michał
2019. Brexit and the imaginary of ‘crisis’: a discourse-conceptual analysis of European news media. Critical Discourse Studies 16:4  pp. 465 ff. DOI logo
Krzyżanowski, Michał, Ruth Wodak, Hannah Bradby, Mattias Gardell, Aristotle Kallis, Natalia Krzyżanowska, Cas Mudde & Jens Rydgren
2023. Discourses and practices of the ‘New Normal’. Journal of Language and Politics 22:4  pp. 415 ff. DOI logo
Luke, Allan
2023. Phil Graham and axiological discourse analysis: after neoliberalism. Critical Discourse Studies  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Jiayu & Mingfeng Yang

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.