Article published In:
Journal of Language and PoliticsVol. 19:4 (2020) ► pp.666–690
Who are ‘the people’?
Uses of empty signifiers in propagandistic news discourse
As expressions without clear definition but with strong normative charging, empty signifiers play an important role in political discourse. Uniting diverse populations under a common banner and endowing political demands with self-evident legitimacy, they constitute a potent tool for rallying support for political action. Among empty signifiers, one particularly versatile construct are ‘the people’ as bearers of ultimate political legitimacy. In this paper, we investigate how ‘the people’ are constructed in propagandistic conflict narratives during the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, imbuing the concept with different meanings in the pursuit of competing political ends. We show how ‘the people’ are constructed as democratic sovereign, enduring nation, moral humans or dispersed media publics, each time summoning different kinds of legitimacy and using different strategies to construct encompassing consensus and marginalize dissent. We discuss implications for the study of ideological discourse, populism and political communication.
Keywords: the people, empty signifiers, populism, propaganda, legitimation, political discourse, ideology, Russian-Ukrainian conflict
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Empty signifiers
- 2.1Empty signifiers as appeals to consensus
- 2.2Empty signifiers as legitimizing devices
- 2.3Empty signifiers as tools for political mobilization
- 2.4The power of ‘the people’
- 3.Populism and propagandistic narratives in Eastern Ukraine
- 3.1The role of propagandistic media
- 4.Method
- 5.Findings
- 5.1The people as a sovereign
- 5.2The people as the nation
- 5.3The people as humans
- 5.4The people as the public
- 6.Discussion
- Notes
-
References
References
Abts, Koen, and Stefan Rummens
2007 “Populism versus democracy.” Political studies 55 (2): 405–424. 
Ajanovic, Edma, Stefanie Mayer, and Birgit Sauer
Akkerman, Agnes, Cas Mudde, and Andrej Zaslove
2014 “How populist are the people? Measuring populist attitudes in voters.” Comparative political studies 47 (9): 1324–1353.
Alvares, Claudia, and Peter Dahlgren
2016 “Populism, extremism and media: Mapping an uncertain terrain.” European Journal of Communication 31 (1): 46–57.
Anderson, Benedict
2006 Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Verso Books.
Aragonès, Enriqueta, and Zvika Neeman
2000 “Strategic ambiguity in electoral competition.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 12 (2): 183–204.
Batistová, Anna, and Nico Carpentier
Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall
2005 “Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach.” Discourse studies 7 (4–5): 585–614.
Canovan, Margaret
2005 The people. Polity.
Chilton, Paul
Dahlberg, Lincoln
2011 “Discourse theory as critical media politics? Five questions.” In Discourse theory and critical media politics, ed. by Lincoln Dahlberg, and Sean Phelan, 41–63. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
De Cleen, Benjamin, and Nico Carpentier
2010 “Contesting the populist claim on ‘the people’ through popular culture: the 0110 concerts versus the Vlaams Belang.” Social Semiotics 20 (2): 175–196.
Duvold, Kjetil, and Sten Berglund
2014 “Democracy between ethnos and demos: Territorial identification and political support in the Baltic states.” East European Politics and Societies 28 (2): 341–365.
Edelman, Murray
1988 Constructing the political spectacle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Eisenberg, Eric M.
1984 “Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communication.” Communication monographs 51 (3): 227–242.
Engel, Jakob, and Ruth Wodak
2013 “Calculated ambivalence” and Holocaust denial in Austria.” In Analysing Fascist Discourse: European Fascism in Talk and Text, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and John E. Richardson, 83–106. New York: Routledge.
Esser, Frank, Agnieszka Stępińska, and David Nicolas Hopmann
2016 “Populism and the media. Cross-national findings and perspectives”, In Populist political communication in Europe, ed. by Toril Aalberg, Frank Esser, Carsten Reinemann, Jesper Stromback, and Claes De Vreese, 365–381. New York: Routledge.
Finlay, W. M. L.
2007 “The propaganda of extreme hostility: Denunciation and the regulation of the group.” British Journal of Social Psychology, 46 (2): 323–341.
Glasze, Georg
2007 “The discursive constitution of a orld-spanning region and the role of empty signifiers: the case of Francophonia.” Geopolitics 12 (4): 656–679.
Handford, Michael
2014 “Cultural identities in international, interorganisational meetings: a corpus-informed discourse analysis of indexical we.” Language and Intercultural Communication 14 (1): 41–58.
Hawkins, Kirk A.
2014 Venezuela’s Chavismo and populism in comparative perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heinisch, Reinhard
2003 “Success in opposition–failure in government: explaining the performance of right-wing populist parties in public office.” West European Politics 26 (3): 91–130.
Jagers, Jan, and Stefaan Walgrave
2007 “Populism as political communication style: An empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium.” European journal of political research 46 (3): 319–345.
Krämer, Benjamin
2014 “Media populism: A conceptual clarification and some theses on its effects.” Communication Theory 24 (1): 42–60.
Kulyk, Volodymyr
2018 “Shedding Russianness, recasting Ukrainianness: The post-Euromaidan dynamics of ethnonational identifications in Ukraine.” Post-Soviet Affairs 34 (2–3): 119–138.
Laclau, Ernesto
1977 Politics and ideology in Marxist theory: Capitalism, fascism, populism. London: New Left Books.
2005 On populist reason. London: Verso.
2006 “Ideology and post-Marxism.” Journal of Political Ideologies 11 (2): 103–114.
Law, Alex
2001 “Near and far: banal national identity and the press in Scotland”. Media, Culture & Society 23 (3): 299–317.
Liebes, Tamar, and Zohar Kampf
2009 “Black and white and shades of gray: Palestinians in the Israeli media during the 2nd intifada.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 14 (4): 434–453.
Liebes, Tamar
1997 Reporting the Arab-Israeli conflict: How hegemony works. London: Routledge.
Lipman, Maria, Kachkaeva, Anna, and Michael Poyker
2018 “Media in Russia: Between modernization and monopoly”. In The new autocracy: Information, politics, and policy in Putin’s Russia, ed. by Daniel Treisman, 159–190. Washington: Brookings.
Martin, Denis-Constant
1995 “The choices of identity.” Social identities 1 (1): 5–20.
Mayaffre, Damon, and Ronny Scholz
2017 “Constructing ‘the French people’ – On Sarkozy’s populism.” Journal of Language and Politics 16 (5): 683–705.
Mazzoleni, Gianpietro
2008 “Populism and the media”. In Twenty-first century populism: The spectre of Western European democracy, ed. by Daniele Albertazzi, and Duncan McDonnell, 49–64. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mudde, Cas, and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser
2018 “Studying populism in comparative perspective: Reflections on the contemporary and future research agenda.” Comparative Political Studies 51 (13): 1667–1693.
Mudde, Cas
2004 “The Populist Zeitgeist.” Government and Opposition 39 (4): 542–563.
Nagle, John
1997 “Ethnos, demos and democratization: A comparison of the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland.” Democratization 4 (2): 28–56.
Parekh, Bhikhu
1995 “Ethnocentricity of the nationalist discourse.” Nations and Nationalism 1 (1): 25–52.
Pasitselska, Olga
2017 “Ukrainian crisis through the lens of Russian media: Construction of ideological discourse.” Discourse & Communication 11 (6): 591–609.
Petersoo, Pille
2007 “What does ‘we’ mean?: National deixis in the media.” Journal of Language and Politics 6 (3): 419–436.
Phelan, Sean, and Lincoln Dahlberg
2011 Discourse theory and critical media politics: An introduction. In Discourse theory and critical media politics, ed. by Lincoln Dahlberg, and Sean Phelan, 1–40. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Reisigl, Martin
2017 “The discourse-historical approach.” In The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies, ed. by John Flowerdew, and John E. Richardson, 44–59. New York: Routledge.
Rheindorf, Markus
2019 Revisiting the toolbox of discourse studies: New trajectories in methodology, open data, and visualization. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ricoeur, Paul
1992 Oneself as another. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Rojo, Luisa Martín, and Teun A. Van Dijk
1997 “ ‘There was a Problem, and it was Solved!’: Legitimating the Expulsion of Illegal ‘Migrants in Spanish Parliamentary Discourse.” Discourse & Society 8 (4): 523–566.
Ryabinska, Natalya
2014 “Media capture in post-communist Ukraine: Actors, methods, and conditions.” Problems of Post-Communism 61 (2): 46–60.
Simons, Jon
2011 “Mediated construction of the people: Laclau’s political theory and media politics.” In Discourse theory and critical media politics, ed. by Lincoln Dahlberg, and Sean Phelan, 201–221. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Stavrakakis, Yannis
2004 “Antinomies of formalism: Laclau’s theory of populism and the lessons from religious populism in Greece.” Journal of Political Ideologies 9 (3): 253–267.
Szostek, Joanna
2017 “The power and limits of Russia’s strategic narrative in Ukraine: The role of linkage.” Perspectives on Politics 15 (2): 379–395.
Taggart, Paul A.
2000 Populism. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Theodoropoulou, Irene
2019 “Social class struggle as a Greek political discourse.” Discourse & Society 30 (1): 85–102.
Treisman, Daniel
2018 “Rethinking Putin’s political order: Introduction”. In The new autocracy: Information, politics, and policy in Putin’s Russia, ed. by Daniel Treisman, 1–28. Washington: Brookings.
Van Dijk, Teun A.
1998 Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Van Leeuwen, Theo V.
2007 “Legitimation in discourse and communication”. Discourse & Communication 1 (1): 91–112.
Vartanova, Elena
2012 “The Russian media model in the context of post-Soviet dynamics”. In Comparing media systems beyond the Western world, ed. by Daniel C. Hallin, and Paolo Mancini, 119–142. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf de Cillia, Martin Reisigl, and Karin Liebhart
2009 The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Wodak, Ruth
2015 The politics of fear: What right-wing populist discourses mean. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
2017 “The ‘Establishment’, the ‘Élites’, and the ‘People’.” Journal of Language and Politics 16 (4): 551–565.
Wroe, Lauren Elizabeth
2018 “ ‘It really is about telling people who asylum seekers really are, because we are human like anybody else’: Negotiating victimhood in refugee advocacy work.” Discourse & Society 29 (3): 324–343.
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
Maritz, Ansie
2022. Propaganda as expressed through nouns. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 40:1 ► pp. 15 ff. 
Pasitselska, Olga
2022. Logics of Exclusion: How Ukrainian Audiences Renegotiate Propagandistic Narratives in Times of Conflict. Political Communication ► pp. 1 ff.
Pérez-Curiel, Concha, Ricardo Domínguez-García & Gloria Jiménez-Marín
2021. Public Sphere and Misinformation in the U.S. Election: Trump’s Audience and Populism Indicators in the COVID-19 Context. Journalism and Media 2:3 ► pp. 335 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.