Article published In:
Journal of Language and PoliticsVol. 19:4 (2020) ► pp.624–645
Wrestling between English and Pinyin
Language politics and ideologies of coding street names in China
This paper examines the code choice and contestations on street name signs in China to find out the dynamics of language politics and the language ideological debates. In China, Hanyu Pinyin and English compete for visibility on street signs, though only Pinyin is the legally-endorsed alphabetic form for place names. Spolsky’s (2004, 2009) tripartite language policy model is adopted to analyse the management, practice and ideologies regarding the code choice on street name signs in Chinese cities. It shows that Pinyin has been promulgated as domestic standard fused with national interests in the official discourse, while English win the favour of the general public and some international-oriented cities due to its pragmatic value and the symbolic capital associated with it. The resilient approach taken by the top authority suggests that the traditional model of language management relying on political authority and ideological hegemony is hard to work its way out nowadays.
Keywords: street names, public signs, language ideology, language politics, Pinyin, English
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Pinyin and English in China’s language repertoire
- 3.The tripartite framework of language policy
- 4.Analysis
- 4.1Management of alphabetic writing on street signs
- 4.2Coding practice on street signs in China
- 4.2.1Code preference on street signs
- 4.2.2Issues with alphabetic codes on street signs
- 4.3Language beliefs on street name signs
- 4.3.1Attitudes from Chinese scholars
- 4.3.2Public attitudes as projected in social media
- 4.3.3Public attitudes emerged in a survey
- 5.Discussion
- 5.1The crux of Pinyin-English contestations on street name signs
- 5.1.1Alphabetic code: Translation or phonetic annotation
- 5.1.2Mandatory or recommendatory policies
- 5.1.3The functional domains of English on public signs
- 5.2The ideological debates regarding the code choice
- 5.3Resilience approach in language management
- 5.1The crux of Pinyin-English contestations on street name signs
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References
Baudrillard, Jean
2018 The Consumer Society: Myths and Structure (revised edition). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Ben-Rafael, Eliezer
2009 “A Sociological Approach to the Study of Linguistic Landscapes.” In Linguistic Landscape: Expanding the Scenery, ed. by Elana Shohamy, and Durk Gorter, 40–54. New York: Routledge.
Berg, Per Olof, and Emma Björner
(eds.) 2014 Branding Chinese Mega-Cities: Policies, Practices and Positioning. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. 
Blommaert, Jan
(ed.) 1999 Language Ideological Debates. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
2005 Discourse: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bolton, Kingsley, and David Graddol
2012 “English in China Today.” English Today 28(3): 3–9.
Chappell, Hilary
1980 “The Romanization Debate.” The Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs 81: 105–118.
Chen, Ping
1999 Modern Chinese: History and Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chinanews.cn
2006 China to Reconsider the Translation of the Street Names. Retrieved from [URL] on 8 August 2019.
Cooper, Robert
1989 Language Planning and Social Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cortazzi, Martin, and Lixian Jin
1996 “English Teaching and Learning in China.” Language Teaching 291: 61–80.
Ding, Wenlei
Foucault, Michel
1980 Power/Knowledge. New York: Pantheon.
Gasque, Thomas J.
2000 “Structure and Controversy: What Names Authorities Adjudicate.” Names 48 (3–4): 199–206.
Ge, Xiaoqin
2009 “Zhongguo diming yingyi pinyinhua zhi wenhua fansi [Reflections on the Romanization of Chinese Geographical Names].” Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages 32(2): 61–66.
Ge, Xiaoqin, and Zhengming Ji
2006 “Diming yingyi hequhecong [Translation of Geographical Names: Where to Go].” Shanghai Journal of Translators 31: 57–59.
Guo, Jianzhong
2007 “Jiedao lupai shuxie de guojia biaozhun yu guoji biaozhun [National Standards and International Norms of the Alphabetical Writing System of Road Signs].” Chinese Translators Journal 51: 68–71.
Hu, Guangwei
2003 “English Language Teaching in China: Regional Differences and Contributing Factors.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 241: 290–318.
2005 “English Language Education in China: Policies, Progress, and Problems.” Language Policy 41: 5–24.
Hui, Xiaojing
2010 “Lumingpai gai jiazhu pinyin haishi yingwen? Wangyou: biaoshi “pinyin shui kan” [Pinyin or English, Which Should be Added on Road Name Signs? Netizens: “Who Bothers to Read Pinyin”].” Wuxi Ribao, December 23 2010 Retrieved on December 4 2017 from [URL]
Kallen, Jeffrey
2009 “Tourism and Representation in the Irish Linguistic Landscape.” In Linguistic Landscape: Expanding the Scenery, ed. by Elana Shohamy, and Durk Gorter, 270–283. New York: Routledge.
Kothari, C. R.
2004 Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques. New Dehli: New Age International (P) Ltd. Publishers.
Li, Songqing
2016 “English, Advertising and Positioning: The Impact of English on Chinese People’s Daily Lives.” Journal of World Languages 2(2–3): 77–93.
Liu, Fei.
2015 “Zhongwen diming yingyi de kunhuo [Confusions of the English Translation of Chinese Place Names].” People’s Daily (Overseas) 10 June 2015 Retrieved from [URL] on 25 July 2019.
Nahir, Moshe
1984 “Language Planning Goals: A Classification.” Language Problems and Language Planning 81: 294–327.
Neethling, Bertie
2016 “Street Names: A Changing Urban Landscape.” In The Oxford Handbook of Names and Naming, ed. by Carole Hough, 144–157. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rose-Redwood, Reuben, Derek Alderman, and Maoz Azaryahu
(eds.) 2017 The Political Life of Urban Streetscapes: Naming, Politics, and Place. London: Routledge.
Shohamy, Elana
2006 Language Policy: Hidden Agendas and New Approaches. London: Routledge.
Spolsky, Bernard
2004 Language Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2009 Language Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(ed.) 2012 The Cambridge Handbook of Language Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2014 Language Management in the People’s Republic of China. Language 90(4):165–179.
Sun, Donghu
2005 “Beijing diming luomahua pinxie de miuwu [Absurd Spellings in Roman Letters of Placenames in Beijing].” Urban Problems 41: 70–73.
UNGEGN (United Nations Group of Experts on Geographical Names)
Wang, Ted
2016 “Law of the People’s Republic of China on the Standard Spoken and Written Chinese Language.” Chinese Law and Government 48(4): 275–278.
Woolard, Kathryn A.
Xing, Jie
2013 “Youguan daolu mingcheng gonggong biaoshi yingyu shuxie biaozhun de zhengyi [Controversies of English Translation of Street Names on Public Signs].” Chinese Translators Journal 51: 108–112.
Yamane, Taro
1973 Statistics: An Introductory Analysis. New York: Harper and Row.
Yan, Weiqi, and Jijun Cao
2015 “Lupai biaoshi, yong “Rd” haishi “Lu” [Rd or Lu on Road signs].” Guangming Daily 3 April 2015 Retrieved from [URL] on 1 August 2019.
Ye, Zhangyong, and Yang Shen
2015 “Guojihua beijingxia woguo diming tongming yinyi fangan xingsi [Perceptions on Pinyin Transcription of Generic Terms in Chinese Geographical Names].” Shanghai Urban Planning Review 61: 121–124.
Zhou, Youguang