Devolution in the UK has engendered debates about which language (or languages) should be the language of parliament in the respective regional institutions. Simultaneously, the European Union, while officially endorsing cultural and linguistic diversity, is moving towards a supranational state which operates alongside devolution and regional autonomies. In this context, the contestation of the language of parliamentary discourse can be seen as a site of power struggle and political negotiation. The present analysis focuses on a specific example of regional parliamentary discourse from Northern Ireland, in which Members debate the desirability of using Ulster-Scots and Irish, alongside English, in official House proceedings. This can be seen to operationalise “language” in specific, but interrelated, argumentative contexts: (a) as a form of agreed and formally recognised communication; (b) as a natural right, reflecting individual culture or heritage; (c) as a legal and formal right; (d) as a political symbol. These themes are discussed in terms of “nationalist” and “sovereign” state arguments, with reference to both the political context of Northern Ireland, and the processes of devolution and supranationalism, in the broader political arena.
Foucault, Michel. 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Tavistock Press.
Habermas, Jürgen. 2001. The European nation-state: On the past and future of sovereignty and citizenship. In: Ciaran Cronin and Pablo De Greiff (eds). Jürgen Habermas, The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory (3rd print). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 105–29.
Ignatieff, Michael. 1999. Benign nationalism? The possibilities of the civic ideal. In: Edward Mortimer and Robert Fine (eds.). People, Nation and State: The Meaning of Ethnicity and Nationalism. London: Tauris, 141–8.
James, William. 1975. Pragmatism and the Meaning of Truth. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Kuo, Sai-Hua. 2001. Generating applause and laughter: A study of rhetoric and response in the 1998 Taipei mayoral debates. Concentric: Studies in English Literature and Linguistics 271, 125–49.
Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
MacCormick, Neil. 1999. Does a nation need a state? Reflections on liberal nationalism. In: Edward Mortimer and Robert Fine (eds.). People, Nation and State: The Meaning of Ethnicity and Nationalism. London: Tauris, 125–37.
McGugan, Irene. 2002. New opportunities for the language. Forum for Research into the Languages of Scotland and Ulster 21, 8–9.
McLeod, Wilson. 1998. Scotland’s languages in Scotland’s parliament. Scottish Affairs 241, 68–82.
Mac Póilin, Aodán. 1998. The Linguistic Status of Ulster Scots. Submission to the City Hall, Belfast.
Mar-Molinero, Clare. 1990. Conflict of central goals and local objectives. In: Norman Fairclough (ed.). Language and Power. London: CILT, 52–64.
NicCraith, Mairead. 2000. Contested identities and the quest for legitimacy. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 211, 399–413.
NicCraith, Mairead. 2001. Politicised linguistic consciousness: The case of Ulster-Scots. Nations and Nationalism 71, 21–37.
Ozkirimli, Umut. 2000. Theories of Nationalism: A Critical Introduction. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Rorty, Richard. 1998. Truth and Progress: Philosophical Papers, Vol. 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Wilson, John & Karyn Stapleton
2012. Discourse in the shadows: Discursive construction and the Northern Ireland Assembly. Discourse & Society 23:1 ► pp. 69 ff.
Hargie, Owen & David Dickson
2007. Are important corporate policies understood by employees?. Journal of Communication Management 11:1 ► pp. 9 ff.
Ilie, C.
2006. Parliamentary Discourses. In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, ► pp. 188 ff.
Stapleton, Karyn & John Wilson
2004. Ulster Scots Identity and Culture: The Missing Voices. Identities 11:4 ► pp. 563 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.