Cover not available
Article published In:
Communicating/Doing Politics
[Journal of Language and Politics 3:3] 2004
► pp. 385–407

Controversial works of art

Some notes on public conflicts

| University of Music and Performing ArtVienna

Art is a public affair because its meaning is always collectively negotiated. Thus, public conflicts that are triggered by works of art are essentially political and inevitable. The analysis of these conflicts points to the effective limits of acceptability of art in a given social constellation.

The following paper investigates two types of art conflicts: (1) conflicts that, at first glance, revolve around the interpretation and the aesthetic appreciation of an artwork; and (2) conflicts that explicitly call into question the legal legitimacy of publication of an artwork.

This investigation aims to reveal the variety of contents and conditions which pre-structure public conflicts. Further, it opens a normative discussion of the current forms of dealing with such conflicts in the mass media and in the jurisdiction. Such a critical discussion is necessary, since the political quality of a society can be assessed on how it relates to its own conflicting nature.

Keywords: public conflict, censorship, culture policy, public pressure, jurisdiction, mediation
Published online: 7 January 2005
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.3.3.03zem
References

Literature

Achtisaari, Martii, Frohwein, Jochen and Oreja, Marcelino
2000 Bericht/Report. Heidelberg (see also http://www.virtual-institute.de/de/Bericht-EU/report.pdf ).Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla
1992 Situating the Self. Gender Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Berkeley, George
1901 A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge (1710) In: George Berkeley. Works. Oxford: Clarendon. Vol. 11.Google Scholar
Bolton, Richard
(ed.) 1992 Culture Wars. Documents from Recent Controversies in the Arts. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Bürger, Peter
1974 Theorie der Avantgarde. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Burgtheater
(ed.) 1989 Heldenplatz. Eine Dokumentation. Wien: Burgtheater.Google Scholar
Coser, Lewis
1956 The Function of Social Conflicts. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1972(1956). Theorie sozialer Konflikte. Neuwied: Lucherhand.Google Scholar
Dahrendorf, Rolf
1965 Gesellschaft und Demokratie in Deutschland. Munich: Piper.Google Scholar
Diers, Michael and König, Kasper
(eds) 2001 “Der Bevölkerung”. Aufsätze und Dokumente zur Debatte um das Reichstagsprojekt von Hans Haacke. Frankfurt a. M.: Verlag der Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Dubin, Steven
1992 Arresting Images. Impolitic Art and Uncivic Actions. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
1999 Displays of Power. Controversy in the American Museum from “Encola Gay” to “Sensation”. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Frowein, Jochen and Peukert, Wolfgang
1996 Europäische MenschenRechtsKonvention. Kehl: Engel.Google Scholar
Gallie, William
1962(1956). Essentially contested concepts. In: Max Black (ed.). The Importance of Language. Englewood Cliffs: Pentice-Hall, 121–146.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1990 (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen
1990(1962). Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
1992 Faktizität und Geltung. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Haider, Jörg
1993 Die Freiheit, die ich meine. Frankfurt a. M.: Ullstein.Google Scholar
Hardin, Russell
1995 One for All. The Logic of Group Conflict. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Barbara
1991 They Thought Police are Out There. Reflexion on First Amendment. Art Journal. Nr. 3/19911, 39–44Google Scholar
Holzleithner, Elisabeth
2000 An den Grenzen der Kunst. Reaktionen des Rechts. In: Tasos Zembylas (ed.). Kunst und Politik. Innsbruck: StudienVerlag, 50–65.Google Scholar
Innenministerium des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen
(ed.) 2001 Skinheads und Rechtsextremismus. Düsseldorf.Google Scholar
Janik, Allan
1989 Controversy and human studies. In: Allan Janik. Style, Politics and the Future of Philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 109–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janke, Pia
(ed.) 2002 Die Nestbeschmutzerin. Jelinek & Österreich. Wien: Jung & Jung.Google Scholar
Johannessen, Kjell
1994 Philosophy, art and intransitive understanding. In: Kjell Johannessen (ed.). Wittgenstein and Norway. Oslo: Solum Forlag, 218–250.Google Scholar
Klimitsch, Peter
1994 Die Kultur, die sie meinen. Wien: IG-Kultur.Google Scholar
Leiss, Ludwig
1971 Kunst im Konflikt. Kunst und Künstler im Widerstreit mit der Obrigkeit. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lilienthal, Matthias and Philipp, Claus
(eds) 2000 Schlingensiefs “Ausländer raus”. Frankfurt. a. M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Lübbe, Hermann
1998 Zwischen Herkunft und Zukunft. Bildung in einer dynamischen Zivilisation. Wien: Picus.Google Scholar
Luf, Gerhard
2000 Kunstfreiheit. Aufgabe oder Überforderung des Rechts?. In: Tasos Zembylas (ed.). Kunst und Politik. Innsbruck: StudienVerlag, 21–33.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas
1994 Die Ausdifferenzierung des Kunstsystems. Bern: Benteli.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-François
1986 Philosophie und Malerei im Zeitalter ihres Experimentierens. Berlin: Merve.Google Scholar
Öhlinger, Theo
1985 “Das Gespenst” und die Freiheit der Kunst in Österreich. Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht 41, 190–199.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Michael
1969(1967). Sense-Giving and Sense-Reading. In: Michael Polanyi. Knowing and Being. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 181–207.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass
2001 Das Fernsehen und die Öffentlichkeit. In: Lutz Wingert and Klaus Günther (eds). Die Öffentlichkeit der Vernunft und die Vernunft der Öffentlichkeit. Festschrift für Jürgen Habermas. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp, 678–701.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles
1989 Sources of the Self. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tschmuck, Peter
2003 Medienkonzentration in Österreich. In Andreas Resch (ed.). Kartelle in Österreich. Wien: Manz, 259–283.Google Scholar
UNIKUM
(ed.) 1996 An der Grenze des Erlaubten. Kunst und Zensur in Österreich. Klagenfurt: Unikum.Google Scholar
Waisman, Friedrich
1962(1952). The Resources of Language. In Max Black (ed.). The Importance of Language. Englewood Cliffs: Pentice-Hall, 107–120.Google Scholar
White, Harrison
1993 Careers and Creativity. Social Forces in the Arts. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Wiesenthal, Simon
(ed.) 2000 Projekt Judenplatz Wien. Zur Konstruktion von Erinnerung. Wien: Zsolnay.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig
1953 Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Zembylas, Tasos
1997 Kunst oder Nichtkunst. Über Bedingungen und Instanzen ästhetischer Beurteilung. Wien: WUV-Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
2000 Kunst und Staat: Zwischen Förderung und Kontrolle. In Tasos Zembylas (ed.). Kunst und Politik. Innsbruck: StudienVerlag, 34–49.Google Scholar