Editorial published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 4:3 (2005) ► pp.367370
References
Blommaert, J
2005Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dedaic, M
2004The Sociolinguistic Analysis of State of the Union Addresses: Clinton, Tudjman and Mandela. Unpubl. PhD Dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C..
Fairclough, N
2005Critical discourse analysis in transdisciplinary research. In: R. Wodak and P. A. Chilton (eds.) 2005 A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Interdisciplinarity. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 53–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jessop, B
2004Critical semiotic analysis and cultural political economy. Critical Discourse Studies 1(2), 159–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krzyzanowski, Michal
2005‘European identity wanted!’ On discursive dimensions of the European Convention. In: R. Wodak and P. A Chilton (Eds.). A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Interdisciplinarity. Amsterdam/Phil.: Benjamins, 137–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R and Wodak, R.
Panagl, O. and Wodak, R.
(eds.) 2004Text und Kontext: Theoriemodelle und methodische Verfahren im transdiziplinären Vergleich. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar
Scollon, R. and Scollon, S
2004Nexus Analysis: Discourse and the Emerging Internet. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tricento, T
2005An Introduction to Language Policy. London: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Wodak, R
1996Disorders of Discourse. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2001The discourse-historical approach. In: R. Wodak and M. Meyer (eds.) 2001 Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage, 63–94.Google Scholar
2005aGender mainstreaming and the European Union: Interdisciplinarity, gender studies and CDA. In: M. Lazar (ed.). Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis. Gender, Power and Ideology in Discourse. London: Palgrave, 90–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005bSprache und Politik — Sprache in der Politik — Sprache/Sprechen über (Sprache in/und) Politik: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen diskursanalytischer Vorgangsweisen. Aptum 1(2), 135–153.Google Scholar
Wodak, R. Novak, P., Pelikan, J., Gruber, H., De Cillia, R., and Mitten, R
1990“Wir sind alle unschuldige Täter”. Diskurshistorische Studie zum Nachkriegsantisemitismus. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Wodak, R., and Weiss, G
2005 Analyzing European Union discourses: Theories and applications. In: R. Wodak and P. A. Chilton (eds). A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Interdisciplinarity. Amsterdam/Phil.: Benjamins, 121–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

Gould, Robert
2011. Managing Ambivalence and Identity: Immigration Discourses and (trans)national Identities in the European Union. In Transnational Europe,  pp. 170 ff. DOI logo
Hopewell, Kristen
2017. Invisible Barricades: Civil Society and the Discourse of the WTO. Globalizations 14:1  pp. 51 ff. DOI logo
Hopewell, Kristen
2017. Invisible Barricades: Civil Society and the Discourse of the WTO. SSRN Electronic Journal DOI logo
Saarinen, Taina
2008. Whose quality? Social actors in the interface of transnational and national higher education policy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 29:2  pp. 179 ff. DOI logo
Saarinen, Taina
2008. Position of text and discourse analysis in higher education policy research. Studies in Higher Education 33:6  pp. 719 ff. DOI logo
Saarinen, Taina
2008. Persuasive presuppositions in OECD and EU higher education policy documents. Discourse Studies 10:3  pp. 341 ff. DOI logo
Shi-xu
2012. Why do cultural discourse studies? Towards a culturally conscious and critical approach to human discourses. Critical Arts 26:4  pp. 484 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.