Article published In:
Journal of Language and PoliticsVol. 4:3 (2005) ► pp.371–396
The rhetoric of work flexibility
A diatextual frame of Italian political discourse
This article deals with the discursive construction of work flexibility in Italy, through the analysis of the integral Italian White Paper on Occupation and of a corpus of 55 Editorials which discuss this topic in the pages of a popular Italian economic newspaper. Evident similarities have been registered between them as both texts are actually socio-political texts aimed at constructing and conveying a specific representation of work flexibility, thus proposing and supporting the reformation of the Italian labour market. Any difference has been discussed by making reference to the different kind of audience that the texts address: the expert audience of the Italian government for the White Paper and the more heterogeneous audience of mass communication for the editorials.
References
Bakhtin, M
1973 Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics (2nd edition) USA: Ann Arbor.
Billig, M
1997 Banal Nationalism. London: Routledge.
Chilton, P. and Ilyn, M
1993 Metaphor in political discourse: The case of the ‘Common European House’. Discourse and Society 4811, 7–31. 
Cortini, M. and Manuti, A
2002 Il marketing politico sul web: Strategie discorsive di auto-presentazione dei partiti politici italiani [Political marketing on the web: the discursive strategies of Italian political parties in self presentation]. In: (a cura di)G. Mininni. Virtuale.com: la parola spiazzata [Virtual.com: the misplaced word]. Napoli: Idelson Gnocchi, 123–155.
Crismore, A., Markannen, R. and Steffenson, M
1993 Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: A study of texts written in American and Finnish university students. Written Communication 10(1), 39–71.
Dickerson, P
1997 It’s not just me who’s saying this: The deployment of cited the others in televised political discourse. British Journal of Social Psychology 361, 33–48.
1998 I did it for the nation: Repertoires of intents in televised political discourse. British Journal of Social Psychology 371, 477–484.
Eco, U
1979 Lector in fabula. Milano: Bompiani.
Fairclough, N
1992 Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
1993 Critical Discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: the universities. Discourse & Society 41, 133–168.
Fairclough, N. and Wodak, R
1997 Critical Discourse Analysis. In: T. A van Dijk (ed.). Discourse as Social Interaction. London: Sage, 258-284.
Graham, P. and Paulsen, N
2002 Third-sector discourses and the future of (un)employment: Skill labour, new technologies and the meaning of work. Text22(3): 443–467.
Halliday, M
1973 Explorations in the functions of language. London: Arnold
Lakoff, R. and Johnson, M
1980 Metaphors We Live by. University of Chicago: Chicago
Lauerbach, G
1999 From macro to micro and back: Framing, footing and genre in recent TV election night coverages. Proceeding of the Budapest Pragma Conference, 317–343.
Lemke, J. L
1999 Typology, Topology, Topography: Genre Semantics. http://academics.brooklyn.cuny.edu/education/jlemke/papers7cardiff-abs.htm
1995 Textual Politics: Discourse and Social Dynamics. London: Taylor and Francis.
Manuti A.
2004 Politics and advertising: Analysing the rhetorical strategies and persuasive devices in the Italian political advertising, In: J. Vivier, J. Drevillon and A. Salinas. Psycholinguistics: A Multidisciplinary Science. What Implications, What Applications? Paris: Europia, 355–360.
McCombs, M. and Shaw, D. L
1993 The evolution of the agenda setting research: Twenty-five years in the marketplace of ideas. Journal of Communication 43(2), 58–67.
Merlini Barbaresi, L.
1987 Certainly and obviously: Two different functions in argumentative discourse. Folia Linguistica 211, 3–24.
Mininni, G
1992 Diatesti. Per una psicosemiotica del discorso sociale [Diatexts: A psycho-semiotic approach to social discourse]. Napoli: Liguori.
2000 Psicologia del Parlare comune [Psychology of common talk]. Bologna: Grasso.
2003 Il discorso come forma di vita [Discourse as a form of life]. Napoli: Guida.
2005 Diatexts as a mirror of human complexity. World Future 611, 163–175.
Mumby, D. K and Robin, P. C
1997 Organizational discourse. In: T. A. van Dijk (ed.). Discourse as Social Interaction. London: Sage, 180–205
Muntigl, P., Weiss, G. and Wodak, R
Obeng, S. G
1997 Language and politics: Indirectness in political discourse, Discourse & Society 8(1), 49–83.
Ortony, A
1993 Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Peiro, J. M., Garcia M. J. and Garcia, F
2002 How do young people cope with job flexibility? Demographic and psychological antecedents of the resistance to accept a job with non-preferred flexibility features. Applied Psychology: An International Review 51(1), 43–66.
Potter, J. and Wetherell, M
1987 Discourse and Social Psychology. Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London: Sage.
Reilly, P. A
1998 Balancing flexibility: Meeting the interests of employer and employee. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 7(1), 7–2.
Searle, J. R
1998 Mind, Language and Society. London: Sage.
Stati, S
1996 Il lessico dell’argomentazione [The lexicon of argumentation]. In: M. Bondi (a cura di). Forms of Argumentative Discourse. Bologna: Clueb, 51–56.
Straehle, C., Weiss, G., Wodak, R., Muntigl, P. and Sedlak, M
1999 Struggle as a metaphor in European Union discourses on unemployment. Discourse & Society 10(1), 67–99.
Toulmin, S
1958 The Uses of Argument. London: Cambridge Press.
1970 An Examination of the Place of Reason in Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van Dijk, T.
1998 Ideology. A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.
van Dijk, T. A
1993 Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society 4(2), 249–283.
1997 Discourse as Social Interaction, London: Sage.
van Eemeren, F. H. and Houtlosser, P
1999 Strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse. Discourse Studies 11, 479–497.
van Leeuwen, T.
1996 The representation of social actors. In: R. Caldas-Coulthard and M. Coulthard (eds). Texts and Practices — Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge, 31–72.
van Leeuwen, T. and Wodak, R.
1999 Legitimising immigration control: A discourse historical analysis. Discourse Studies 1(1), 83–119.
Venier, F
1991 La modalizzazione assertiva [The assertive modalisation]. Milano: Angeli.
Weigand, E
1999 Rhetoric and argumentation in dialogic perspective. In: E. Rigotti (ed.). Rhetoric and Argumentation. Tubingen: Niemeyer, 53–69.
2000 The dialogic action game. In: M. Coulthard (ed.). Dialogue Analysis VII. Working with Dialogue. Tubingen: Niemeyer, 1–18.
Wodak, R., de Cillia, R., Reisigl, M. and Liebhart, K
1999 The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Wodak, R. and van Leeuwen, T
2002 Discourses of unemployment in Europe: The Austrian case. Text 22(3), 345–367.
Zupnik, Y
1994 A pragmatic analysis of the use of person deixis in political discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 211, 339–383.
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
Eleanor, Malbon & Carey Dr. Gemma
2017. Implications of work time flexibility for health promoting behaviours. Evidence Base 2017:4 ► pp. 1 ff. 
Manuti, Amelia & Giuseppe Mininni
2010. Social Representations of Medically Assisted Fecundation a Study on the Discursive Construction of “Media Texts”. Psychology 01:05 ► pp. 337 ff.
Mininni, Giuseppe, Amelia Manuti & Graziana Curigliano
2013. Commemorative acts as discursive resources of historical identity. Culture & Psychology 19:1 ► pp. 33 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.