Cover not available
Article published In:
Who’s really normal? Language and sexuality in public space
Edited by Mie Hiramoto
[Journal of Language and Sexuality 4:2] 2015
► pp. 193–222

Demeanor indexicals, interpretive discourses and the “Kong Girl” stereotype

Constructing gender ideologies in social media

| University of Hong Kong
| Lingnan University, Hong Kong

Focusing on a Hong Kong online discussion involving ‘Jenny’, who was later described as the ‘Kong Girl’ prototype, we demonstrate a method to study gender stereotype as both semiotically and discursively constructed. We trace the perceivable signs in online posts as demeanor indexicals (Goffman 1956, Agha 2007), and discuss how forum participants collectively develop Jenny’s public persona as a woman who is materialistic and has an entitlement attitude, qualities that later become emblematic of the Kong Girl stereotype. Our analysis proposes a framework for how interpretive discourses mediate between the situated social media context and gender ideologies, and contributes to an understanding of the role of demeanor indexicals in the construction of a stereotype that is not associated with a linguistic register. We provide insights into local gender dynamics and illustrate how a private dispute becomes entangled in a public consensus building process that is necessarily selective, emergent, and positioned.

Keywords: demeanor, demeanor indexical, gender stereotype, gender ideologies, interpretive discourse, indexicality
Published online: 18 September 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.4.2.02che
References
Agha, Asif
1998 Stereotypes and registers of honorific language. Language in Society 271: 151–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 Language and Social Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary
1999 “Why be normal?”: Language and identity practices in a community of nerd girls. Language in Society 28(2): 203–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary & Hall, Kira
2005 Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies 7(4-5): 585–614. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith
1990 Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah
2005 Language, gender and sexuality: Current issues and new directions. Applied Linguistics 26(4): 482–502. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eagleton, Terry
1991 Ideology: An Introduction. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope
2000 Linguistic Variation as Social Practice: The Linguistic Construction of Identity in Belten High. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Edley, Nigel
2001 Analysing masculinity, interpretative repertoires, ideological dilemmas and subject positions. In Discourses as Data – A Guide for Analysis, Margaret Wetherell, Stephanie Taylor & Simeon J. Yates (eds), 189–228. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Nigel & Mulkay, Michael
1984 Opening Pandora’s Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists’ Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1956 The nature of deference and demeanor. American Anthropologist 58(3): 473–502. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haviland, John B
2005 ‘Whorish old man’ and ‘one (animal) gentleman’. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15(1): 81–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herring, Susan
2003 Gender and power in on-line communication. In The Handbook of Language and Gender, Janet Holmes & Miriam Meyerhoff (eds), 202–228. Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Inoue, Miyako
2004 What does language remember? Indexical inversion and the naturalized history of Japanese women. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 14(1): 39–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara
2002 Discourse Analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kang, M. Agnes & Chen, Katherine
2014 Stancetaking and the Hong Kong Girl in a shifting heterosexual marketplace. Discourse & Society 25(2): 205–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendon, Adam
2004 Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, Robin
1975 Language and Woman’s Place. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Lippman, Walter
1922 Public Opinion. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Luke, Kang Kwong
1990 Utterance Particles in Cantonese Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Macrae, C. Neil, Stangor, Charles & Hewstone, Miles
(eds) 1996 Stereotypes and Stereotyping. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
McGarty, Craig, Yzerbyt, Vincent & Spears, Russell
(eds) 2002 Stereotypes as Explanations: The Formation of Meaningful Beliefs about Social Groups. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Laura
2004 You are doing burikko! Censoring/scrutinizing artificers of cute femininity in Japanese. In Japanese Language, Gender, and Ideology: Cultural Models and Real People, Shigeko Okamoto & Janet S. Shibamoto Smith (eds), 148–165. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2007 Those naughty teenage girls: Japanese Kogals, slang, and media assessments. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 14(2): 225–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Page, Ruth
2012 Stories and Social Media: Identities and Interaction. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carol
1989 The Disorder of Women: Democracy, Feminism and Political Theory. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders
[1902]/1955 Logic as semiotic: The theory of signs. In Philosophical Writings of Peirce, Justus Buchler (ed), 98–119. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Potter, Jonathan & Wetherell, Margaret
1987 Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
1992 The uses and utility of ideology: Some reflections. Pragmatics 2(3): 311–323. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993 Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function. In Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics, John A. Lucy (ed), 33–58. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998 Contemporary transformations of local linguistic communities. Annual Review of Anthropology 271: 401–426. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication 23(3): 193–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spender, Dale
1980 Man Made Language. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Stangor, Charles
(ed) 2000 Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Sunderland, Jane
2004 Gendered Discourses. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sutton, Laurel A
1995 Bitches and skankly hobags: The place of women in contemporary slang. In Gender Articulated: Language and the Socially Constructed Self, Kira Hall & Mary Bucholtz (eds), 279–296. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri
1982 Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology 33(1): 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
TVB
2009 星期日檔案: 港男．講女 播出日期: 2009.03.08 (日) [“TVB (2009) Sunday Report: Kong Men talk about women. Broadcast 2009.03.08 (Sunday)”].
Vaisman, Carmel
2011 Performing girlhood through typographic play in Hebrew blogs. In Digital Discourse: Language in the New Media, Crispin Thurlow & Kristine Mroczek (eds), 177–196. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Warner, Michael
2002 Publics and Counterpublics. New York: Zone Books. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yip, Yat-Zi
2007 Kong Girl Bible. [葉一知 (2007) 港女聖經]. Hong Kong: FLY Media Ltd.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Peng, Chun-Yi
2020. The effects of media exposure and language attitudes on grammaticality judgments. Global Chinese 6:1 ► pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Peng, Chun-Yi
2021. New Masculinities in Online Discourse: A Text-Mining Approach. In Mediatized Taiwanese Mandarin [Sinophone and Taiwan Studies, 2], ► pp. 81 ff. DOI logo
Peng, Chun-Yi
2021. Media Effects on Language Perceptions. In Mediatized Taiwanese Mandarin [Sinophone and Taiwan Studies, 2], ► pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Peng, Chun-Yi & Nicholas Garcia
2020. Mediatized Taiwanese Mandarin: A Text-mining Approach to Speaker Stereotypes. Open Linguistics 6:1 ► pp. 611 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.